For my first perspective I decided to analyze my subject using the psychoanalytic perspective. The psychoanalytic perspective takes a look into the way a persons personality works, especially within internal conflicts, deficits, sense of self, identity, and attachment all in relation to early childhood development. I am specifically going to focus on attachment theory and how it related to my subject in particular. Under attachment theory the particular style or group my subject fell under would be anxious-ambivalent. Anxious-ambivalent behavior refers to adults who feel in the following ways: others are wary to get as close as I want them to, I am afraid my partner does not love me and will not want to stay with me, and my need to be as close as I can be with someone often scares others away. Broken down, anxious-ambivalent behavior results in adults fearing rejection, a need of validation and self worth from his/her partner, insecurities, a non trusting relationship, and having grown up with inconsistent/ unavailable parents. I think that this theory directly relates to my subject in more ways than one. “The results produced by attachment researchers are all compatible with one possibility that various forms of adult attachment arise from a continuous but branching tree of attachment experiences, beginning in infancy and developing throughout the life course. (Bartholomew & Shaver, 1998). Growing up, the subjects parents were inconsistent and unpredictable in the ways they
Psychoanalytic theory can be applied to client treatment by the suggestion that mental illness was treatable and that talking about problems could bring relief to that person. Psychoanalytic theory can be used to help clients in a way that it could help a victim to develop emotional and behavioral strategies to deal with the trauma they may have encountered.
What is attachment theory and why is it an important aspect of intimate relationships and love? The attachment theory of love maintains that the degree and quality of attachments one experiences in early life influence one’s later relationships (Strong & Cohen, 2014). John Bowlby proposed that, based on infants interactions with caregivers, infants construct expectations about relationships in the form of internal working models- cognitive representations of themselves and other people that guide their processing of social information and behavior in relationships (Sigelman & Rider, 2015). This research was further elaborated on by Mary Ainsworth and colleagues, who believed there were three styles of infant attachment: secure, anxious or ambivalent, and avoidant.
Attachment Theory Summary According to Birkenmaier, Berg-Weger, and Dewees (2014), Attachment Theory (A.T.) was proposed by John Bowlby who hypothesized that children and caregivers bond excessively during the primary months of a child’s life. (p.108) Birkenmaier, Berg-Weger, and Dewees further claims that the bonding or lack of bonding critically impacts the person's ability to attach and make meaningful relationships throughout life (p. 109). Furthermore, Bowlby asserts “children who form an attachment to an adult that is, an enduring and socio-emotional relationship are more likely to survive” (Kirst-Ashman and Zastrow, p. 147). Therefore, if a child’s attachment process is interrupted it can cause issues
The attachment theory of Bowlby (1980) helps to explain human bonding, conceptualize attachment, and proximity seeking. According to Lee and Hankin (2009) comfort received from caregiver reassure a child that at the time of distress caregiver will be with them. Furthermore, Lee and Hankin (2009) explains that the attachment within infant-caregiver is regarded as a basis for future relation dynamics of a child. Child, who is having anxious attachment are having difficulty to take caregiver as a secure person and they are characterized as anxious person (Lee & Hankin, 2009). Hamilton (2000) explained about a 12-year longitudinal study that found infant attachment style helps to predict attachment style in adolescence. In addition, a meta-analysis
These following scenarios fit into each of the three attachment styles; secure, ambivalent and avoidant. Charlotte is the 2 year old child of Sandra. Sandra is a solo parent who has fully immersed herself into her work as she cannot deal with the problems she is presently faced with. Sandra tries her best with Charlotte but finds it very hard to meet her needs, so she buries herself in her work and is very inconsistent in caring for Charlotte. As a result of Sandra’s parenting technique Charlotte is very wary of people. When Sandra leaves Charlotte as Kindergarten each morning she becomes quite distressed. But with the return of Sandra, Charlotte does not seem to be comforted by this either. As an adult, these signs of ambivalent attachment could lead Charlotte to become very reluctant to be close to others, she might worry that her partner does not love her or she might become very distraught when a relationship ends. This scenario fits into the ambivalent attachment style as Charlotte displays the characteristics commonly seen with this
Human nature has evolved in ways that allow for people to develop deep connections with one another. These connections are always extremely vulnerable in the very early stages of our infancy. From the moment we are born, we innately seek to forge an attachment with our caregivers; mostly because without it, we would not survive. Evidently, we are biologically programmed to bond with our mothers (or closest caregivers), immediately after birth. More often than not, this is a reciprocal connection which establishes an enduring emotional relationship that inevitably shapes our growth and development. Our capacities to adapt to our environment are inextricably bound to the attachments we form with our closest caregivers.
I really enjoyed reading your post. I believe our attachment whether its insecure avoidant, secure, or insecure ambivalent/resistance starts as we are babies and depends on if we got proper nurturing, love, and attention we needed. Infants use the attachment figure as a “secure base from which to explore the environment and a safe haven to retreat to in times of threat.” (Underwood, M. K., & Rosen, L. H. 2011). If we got the proper care we needed as infants, then we would develop the secure attachment. However, if we didn’t get the proper care we needed, then we would develop the insecure attachment. Our attachment can affect us as adults in many different ways. If we fall into the secure attachment, we often show signs of “trust, emotional
An infant with a secure attachment style has a natural bond with their parent, where they are able to trust them, at the same time leaving their side to discover and explore their surroundings. In an insecure/resistant attachment the relationship the child has with their mother or caregiver is very clingy, thus making them very upset once the caregiver is away. When the mother or caregiver is back they are not easily comforted and resist their effort in comforting them. In an insecure/avoidant attachment the infant is, “indifferent and seems to avoid the mother, they are as easily comforted by a stranger, as by their parent” (Siegler 2011, p.429). Lastly, the disorganized/disoriented attachment is another insecure attachment style in which the infant has no way of coping with stress making their behavior confusing or contradictory. Through these brief descriptions of the attachment theory, many researchers have defined the turning point in which each attachment definition can have an influence on one’s self esteem, well-being and their marital relationship.
We will be exploring the different styles of attachment, how parenting affects attachment style and in turn how it affects our love lives as adults. Built by close relationships, attachment can vary from one relationship to another, depending on how available that person is, especially during infancy and childhood. As adults, we react to things based on our attachment style, which is ingrained but not unchangeable, this not only affects our relationships with prospective partners but everyone we hold close throughout our lives. Attachment is an immensely valuable tool in the world of psychology, with it you can better understand how behavior is influenced by experience.
The most standard method of psychoanalysis is the interpretation of the client’s unconscious mind and the conflicts within it which are altering their day to day functioning. The analyst should uncover the underlying reason for the conflicts in this person’s life causing their distress and symptoms such as depression, anxiety, compulsions, and phobias (Counselling.Directory.org). The client may also show signs of frustration or anger towards the analyst, which should be uncovered and a understood that these hostile feelings could be symbolic, which Robert Langs called the “frame” of therapy. This frame of therapy is the set up with times of therapy, payment fees, and the necessity to talk. When patients made mistakes by forgetting to show
Personalities are often very hard to figure out. Each person has a unique and sometimes complex personality and sometimes they do not mix with others. Different psychologists have different theories as to why people are the way they are. One theory is the psychoanalytic theory. Psychoanalytic theory digs into a person’s mind to find out where their problems stem from. The theories stem from childhood and then dig deep into who each person is as an adult. The following reflects on the theories of Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung and Alfred Adler; they all have similarities, yet are completely different.
The psychoanalytic perspective, is the outlook that behavior and personality are effected by the conflict between one’s inner dreams n and expectation of society. Most of this conflict occurs in unconscious, which is outside the knowledge of an individual. Renowned psychologist, Freud established the psychoanalytic theory as an explanation for perplexed phenomena such as the meaning behind dreams, slips of the tongue, and behavioral reflex reactions to stressful situations. The unconscious is a primary focus in psychoanalytic theory due to its typical development in childhood and the ways in which it influences nearly every detail of an individual’s life. The unconscious mind also holds unvented memories and unexpressed urges that make their process into the conscious mind through a variety of different means. However, topographical theory of the mind states that conscious, preconscious, and unconscious serve as motivating forces in human behavior. Corsin & Wedding (2011) define the conscious as mental activity which individuals are fully aware of, preconscious as thoughts and feelings that could be easily brought to mind and unconscious as thoughts, feelings, and desires of which one is unaware of.
This week we learned about the psychoanalytic process of therapy and what clients go through during therapy when counselors are utilizing this theory. I thought this was a little different to what I visualize of when a client comes in for therapy. Oh really, why is that? Okay let me explain what is involved during psychoanalytic therapy and you tell me if it is what you picture for therapy? Ok. During this type of therapy there are four phases a client goes through. At the beginning, the client will go through an opening phase. During this phase the counselor will determine whether the client would be a good candidate for analysis. If the client is a good candidate for analysis, the role of the client and counselor are explained along with the goals. This is what I found to be a little out there. The primary analytic technique is called free association in which the client lays down on a couch and is required to say whatever comes to mind no matter how frivolous it may be (Murdock, 2013). Freud insisted that his clients do this and “it is called the “fundamental rule” of psychoanalysis” (Murdock, 2013 p.49). If the client meets the qualifications for analysis the counselor explains that “fundamental rule” that they must follow. They must lie down on a couch? Yep apparently with this therapy, they do. Wow, I would feel a little awkward doing that. So would I. Role of the counselor during the analysis, I thought is normal for the most part. The counselor at the beginning
Have you ever wanted to know the deep details of a story and how you can gather more
Features of the Psychoanalytic and Humanistic Perspectives Outline the key features of the psychoanalytic and humanistic perspectives, and briefly compare and contrast their views on conscious experience, a person as an integrated whole, and the role of therapists in arriving at changes. Answer In explaining and predicting animal behaviour, different schools of psychology are of different perspectives; e.g. cognitive approach focuses on the mental processes, behaviourism is based on external stimuli and reinforcement, biological approach is concerned with the relationship between the mind and body and the influence of heredity.