The Government suing any mining companies involved (those that employed miners who were trapped) to re-coup the cost it spent on rescuing the miners and for their after-care.
1) Which mining company (or companies) really should or verifiably do share blame for this tragedy? (it could have been one company's actions that caused the tragedy)
2) Do all of the mining companies involved share an equal stake or level of involvement in the mining operations (suing all companies equally when they do not have an equal level of involvement is not fair)
3) What mining company did the trapped workers work for? (need to know how many people worked for each mining company"¦.the distribution is probably not equal"¦and that would matter)
4) Was the disaster due to human neglect or some sort of freak accident or natural event? (If the disaster was caused by a lightning-induced blast, for example, then the mining company could not have reasonably prevented the entrapment).
5) Does the government take this action in other related events or do they pick and choose (if they are not treating other situations the same, that would undermine their motives) 6) Who would measure the costs involved and what would/would not be included? (Need to know if they're including pain and suffering measures or if it's true costs realized)
7) Did the government allocate its resources fairly and evenly or did they waste a lot of money (if money is due, it should be based on good, and not wasteful, spending.
In 1907, two miles south of Centralia, Illinois was the Centralia Mine No. 5. The Mine was there to provide coal during World War II. This particular mine employed 250 men and produced 2,000 tons of coal each day. During the next several years there were several complaints made regarding the safety of the mine. On March 25, 1947, the mine exploded, killing 111 miners. (Stillman, 2010)
3. Who or what caused the Upper Big Branch mine disaster, and why do you think so?
By having knowledge of the chromium in the water supply, PG&E should have been required to let the people know that were affected by it. By not telling the citizens, they were withholding information that affected these people’s lives. Because a risk was created, consequences came, and nothing was done to prevent such injuries that did occur, PG&E should have been considered negligent.
From February 7, 1942 to the deaths of 111 miners on March 25, 1947, Centralia Number 5 was a disaster waiting to happen. So many things could have been done that were not. Scanlan's first report on February 7, 1942 was a premonition of the disaster to come. Scanlan as an inspector should have and could have done more to prevent this tragedy. This paper will discuss the four measures that Scanlan could have taken to avoid the catastrophe that resulted in so many deaths.
Anthracite coal mining consisted of differing levels of skill and precision that could be lucrative depending upon the miner’s luck. A coal miner would be lucky to find steady employment, or to even survive to the day’s end. The procedures involved in preparing the coal from the mines to the shipping was filled with dangers that led the “industry” as “one of the world’s most hazardous.” Mine owners to maintain “overhead costs” and keep mine workers in the industry, would tactfully engage in underemployment. This left workers in state of constant need for more work, or higher wages to offset working part-time. These Anthracite miners were largely paid more than the average miner, but
In his book “Deep Down Dark: The Untold Stories of 33 Men Buried in a Chilean Mine, and the Miracle That Set Them Free,” Hector Tobar recounts the story of 33 miners who spent 69 days trapped more than 2000 feet underground in the Chile’s San Jose mines following the collapse of the mine in 2010. According to Tobar (2015), the disaster began on a day shift around noon when miners working deep inside the mountain excavating minerals started feeling vibrations. A sudden massive explosion then followed and the passageways of the mines filled with dust clouds. Upon settling of the dust, the men discovered that the source of the explosion was a single stone that had broken off from the rest of the mountain and caused a chain reaction leading to
Subsequently, the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman of the World Bank issued a report refuting LEAT’s claims of mass murder and the number of people displaced, based on evidence supplied by the Tanzanian government and Barrick Gold challenged this evidence. Similarly, Barrick’s North Mara mine suffered great human rights abuses under its predecessor, Canada’s Placer Dome. Lissu, who has been jailed for anti-mining activism, claims that Bar- rick’s security operatives at the North Mara mine have since been linked to six violent deaths and that the killings are part of a strategy to silence mine critics.
The PolyMet mining project should be immediately halted because it has a sustained life span of two decades, PolyMet is backed by a questionable company, and any contamination to the environment by the project will put the town and its people at a significant risk. Though it will create jobs the town’s people should not bank their success on this
The owner of the mine was informed that the mine was losing it's stability, instead of listening to these warnings, he chooses to ignore them. The mine collapses shortly after. The miners are trapped after the only path out of the mine is blocked.
The changes resulting because of the disaster are numerous. It is foolish to even begin to imagine what the families of the miners are experiencing. Then there is the Greymouth
To be more specific, one must learn more about the relationship between the process in which this disaster with chemicals happened and the toxicology. As stated by Pellicori, Gammons, and Poulson in 2005, the Berkley Pit when they analyzed the sample mine water from the acidic pit, they looked into geochemical and stable isotopic
Q #2 Stakeholder analysis, specifying to the extent or degree stakeholders should be held responsible for the accident.
Pike River Mine tragedy took place on the 19th November, 2010 and resulted in deaths of 29 workers. Many factors led to this tragedy especially poor decisions made by PRCM and Department Of Labour. In this Report, many aspects of the tragedy will be discussed.
The series of ethical issues that took place leading to the disaster are complex, and other factors such as economic and political issues arose after the catastrophe happened. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ethical issues that took place before the disaster happened, and investigate the moral obligations, social responsibility and justice at an individual and organizational level. The ethical dilemma is broken down into three categories, which include the company’s management priority to reduce costs and time, neglecting safety issues addressed by staff, human misjudgment and errors in neglecting pressure reading; and finally, overlooking the technical design flaws that were not tested by BP before installing to use. The
South Africa is world leading in mining. The discovery of minerals in this country has attractive many investors and has been the backbone of the country’s economy – leading to many benefits that the people of South Africa could take advantage of. However, not all the benefits are shared equally, and there is a lot of exploitation surrounding the mining sector. This essay will be discussing the issues surrounding the labour exploitation in the mines and the resulting consequences.