RSPCA And The Prevention Of Animal Cruelty

Employees and Managers in RSPCA set marketing objectives in order to create awareness of their products and services to public, to increase their sales in stores, promoting their products and services, launching new products services and brand image. One of their market objectives is “To work for the welfare of pet animals”. This organisation is set up to improve the welfare and support animals from cruelty and provide loving home for them. Another objective is “To raise standards of regulation in animal welfare and ethical journal across the world”. This objective is set by the business to ensure support animals from cruelty and to stop brutality to animals and ensure it applies across the world. On the other hand, another objective for RSPCA is “To improve the lives of animals by putting an end to suffering of animals”. This business aims to stop the suffering of animals when used in experiments that can affect them negatively and kill them.

“Animals are reliable, many full of love, true in their affections, predictable in their actions, grateful and loyal. Difficult standards for people to live up to,” said Alfred A. Montapert, the author of The Supreme Philosophy Of Man. Many animals who have given people their love have been cast off or mistreated. The Humane Society Of The United States(HSUS) has made it their mission since 1954 to prevent this cruelty before it happens. The four founders of HSUS Helen Jones, Larry Andrews, Marcia Glaser, and Fred Meyers, all believed in this mission. I believe that the Humane Society Of The United States has a worthwhile and honorable mission. It is one of the best. Not only does it save thousands of animal lives each year it also works with law enforcement to investigate illegal animal cruelty. HSUS has more than 10 million members and uses its money wisely. If you donate just $19 a month to HSUS you will be doing a grand service and you will join the revolution to stop animal cruelty before it happens. You will be a part of preventing some of the

“In the arms of the angel, Fly away from here, From this dark cold hotel room and the endlessness that you fear” (McLachlan, 1998). These words are instantly remembered by many people from the 2007 ASPCA commercial. This song is known for being associated with sad and heartbreaking events, and paring it with animal cruelty would release a surge of emotions in the audience, which is exactly what the creators of the ASPCA commercials were targeting. ASPCA (The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) is a non-profit organization created to receive monthly donations in order to save the lives of innocent animals being abused and neglected (ASPCA, 2014). The commercial is trying to persuade animal lovers and pet owners to donate to the ASPCA to help support the means to prevent animal cruelty. From the heart-wrenching pictures of abused animals, to the slow and sad music, the ASPCA uses a variety of narratives to create an advertisement that almost anyone with a heart can’t resist to act upon.

The RSPCA, also known as the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, states on their animal cruelty webpage in 2017 that animal abuse is the mistreatment of animals through the physical infliction of pain, neglect, harm, or any means that are detrimental to the health, safety, or mental state of an animal. Such means include starvation, beating, or even failing to care for an animal properly. Not only is it terrible to witness, but it leaves lasting effects on the humans and animals involved.

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) was the first human society to be established in North America and is, today, one of the largest in the world. Henry Bergh, a man of great conviction and a tireless fighter for animals founded the ASPCA on April 10, 1866. Mr. Bergh believed that all animals are entitled to being treated kindly and respectfully at the hands of humans and should be protected under the law. The ASPCA’s mission, as stated by founder Henry Bergh in 1866, is “to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the United States. (The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals [ASPCA], 2014, About us section) When Mr. Bergh founded the ASPCA, he and his volunteers spent tireless hours fighting for the rights of

“To provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the United States”

Tyler Oquendo Mrs. Nidowicz English III Honors 29 October 2017 PSA Annotated Bibliography https://www.aspca.org/?pagename=cruelty_puppymills_statement The A.S.P.C.A is a animal society which fights for the prevention of animal cruelty, this includes dog fighting rings, puppy/animal mills, and general misuse to animals. They also aid in helping with natural disasters, poor counties/cities/families and neutering/spaying. The A.S.P.C.A commends to adopt a puppy from a local shelter than to buy one. This helps to prevent the profits gained from horrible and mistreated animals stuck in breeding operations and mills.

To address the research question, a qualitative comparative case study design will be used to illustrate how toolkit will be used within The Massachusetts Society for Prevention of Cruelty to children (MSPCC) Lawrence as a tool to modify Trauma Focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TFCBT). Within MSPCC Lawrence, a group of practitioners will make cultural modifications to an TF-CBT according on needs identified by the community of Lawrence. This group will be considered the working study case group. A non-working study case will be in place as a baseline which will only use TF-CBT without any modifications. During an initial meeting, the researcher will provide copies of the Toolkit (Toolkit is described in detail in the measures session below) to the clinic director and participating staff at MSPCC to modify TF-CBT. As toolkit is integrated and utilized within the agency, there researcher will collect data. This will include notes from meetings, any handouts, presentation of the toolkit material, and email exchanges as it pertains to the integration of tool kit. The researcher will collect data on therapeutic outcomes as evidenced by a Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) that will be used in both the working and the non-working study case. Collecting these variety of data will be consistent and is a standard in the development of case studies(Baxter & Jack, 2008). The researcher will collect data in the period of three months which is the time frame

In 2003, PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) released a campaign called ‘Holocaust on Your Plate’. This display compared pictures of animals in a slaughterhouse against pictures of Nazi concentration camp. This campaign stemmed from Nobel Prize-winning author Isaac Bashevis Singer, who wrote: ‘In relation to them [animals], all people are Nazis; for them it is an eternal Treblinka’ — a death camp in Poland” (CNN, 2003). It’s meant to emotionally target the viewer, similar to a scare tactic. It was also deeply insulting to many holocaust survivors. I believe this was a poor decision on PETA’s part, and the bad definitely outweighed the good for everyone.

RSPCA is a charity based organisation that helps prevent the cruelty to animals and promotes their care and protection. The first RSPCA was formed in 1871 in VIC. RSPCA is a national body that is found in all eight states and territories. RSPCA is the body that sets national policy while liaising with government and businesses on animal welfare issues.

The study of good and bad, right and wrong, moral principles or value held by a person or society, promoting human welfare, maximizing freedom minimizing pain and suffering is called ethics. The discipline that studies the moral relationship of human beings and also the value and moral status of the environment and its non-human contents is called environmental ethics. It considers the ethical relationship between the humans and the environment. Animal and animal rights are the highlighted topic in the environmental ethics.

This advertisement is without a doubt controversial. An anti-cruelty activist may have a very different view towards this billboard than someone who supports medical testing on animals. Many organizations such as PETA would view this advertisement as useless. This advertisement should not change the minds of people about the topic of medical research, also it's not necessary. People in the medical industry that are against animal testing have stated that this billboard perpetuates an unproven proposition that animals are essential to advancing human health, yet 90 percent of drugs that worked on animals failed in human trials. "The use of animals to test drugs and to study human diseases has been shown over decades to be a failed paradigm.” (Dr. John Pippin). To the extent we have methods already that can replace those, and many believe we should use them.

In the last decade, the views and forms of animal cruelty have changed. Many people have different views of an animal’s rights or purpose. Some people believe that animals have no rights and are a piece of property to be utilized by humans. To others, animals can still be used by humans, but they have emotions as well. A few people consider that only certain animals with high intelligence like chimpanzees or monkeys, should not be used by man, and they should have all the rights that man has currently (“Animal Rights” , 2009). Domestic violence has a correlation with animal abuse. In a survey, 71% of domestic violence victims also reported that their abuser also targeted pets/animals. The most common animals who are abused are cats, dogs, horses,

Animal cruelty is a very serious matter, and it angers me very much. Animal fighting is a very serious cause, and it harms the animals very much, and it’s very inhumane. There are 3 most common types of animal fighting; dog fighting, cock fighting, and hog-dog fighting ("Animal Fighting Facts"). During animal fighting the animals get very hurt, and sometimes even fight to the death. Animals do not deserve to be treated that way, and it should be changed. There are many animals that are treated poorly, and it is very unfair to them. Animal fighting is horrible.

Once rights are granted to certain groups of people, more and different types of group also starts asking for rights. This is an example of a “slippery slope” argument. Similarly, there are groups of people who advocates for the rights of animals. They are speaking out against cruelty that animals have to go through like slaughtering them for food, conducting different kinds of experiments on them, etc. While pro-animal rights people argue about those types of “cruelty,” another group of people believe that animals are needed for those kinds of purposes.