In the 21st century, society has more concern for nature than ever before. On every corner you see a recycling bin or something that helps to preserve the nature around us. It’s hard to believe that in the 1960s people were destroying it so easily. Rachel Carson wrote a game changing book titled Silent Spring. As a woman of the sexist 60s, Carson wasn't held too highly in the eyes of scientist and men of power. However, when her book was published, people rushed to buy it. Scientist read it to prove her wrong while others read it to gain knowledge about what was happening around them. According to Neil Goodwin, Carson brought into question the integrity of the pesticide industry. The book set up the beginning to a change of normal practices …show more content…
Carson does an excellent job detailing the devastation of not only the land, but the wildlife as well. In her effort to persuade nature enthusiast, she uses the best example of the sagebrush lands. As college students looking back on what it was like in the 1960s, it is easy to see how Carson would have easily persuaded her audience; she still has an impact today on the preservation of nature. The sagebrush lands were destroyed, not because of a pest problem, but simply for the reason that the cattlemen wanted grasslands instead. Animals and plants suffered just so grass could be grown. Martin J. Walker describes, in his article The Unquiet Voice of ‘Silent Spring’: The Legacy of Rachel Carson, that her book analyzes the damage which pesticides were causing to the “...environment, wildlife, and inhabitants…” Nothing else would have appealed better to nature enthusiast than that. They could see the destruction of nature, but to read exactly how detrimental spraying was, is probably the most persuasive thing Carson could have used. Carson’s use of cost-benefit analysis was and still is the most impactful persuasive strategy she employed in her tale of
With the creation of DDT, the United States was doing great: insects and pests were being killed off, diseases were being prevented, and everyone was happy and mosquito-free. But upon hearing that DDT was affecting more than just insects, Rachel Carson decided to take action and wrote her bestselling book, “Silent Spring.” However, with the release of ‘Silent Spring’ came very harsh criticism and the birth of the environmental movement. Her book proved to be a very controversial topic, and it still is today with many saying that her assumptions were wrong and she jumped to conclusions without doing any research to back up her claim. But regardless, she couldn't have been the only one to see that DDT was causing problems for more than just
Rachel Carson is a noted biologist who studies biology, a branch of science addressing living organisms, yet she has written a book called Silent Spring to speak about the harmful effects of pesticides on nature. Carson doesn’t write about birds’ genetic and physical makeup, the role of them in the animal food chain, or even how to identify their unbelievable bird songs, yet strongly attests the fight for a well developed environment containing birds, humans, and insects is just and necessary. To Carson, the war for a natural environment is instantly essential for holding on to her true love for the study of biology. Thus Carson claims that whether it be a direct hit towards birds or an indirect hit towards humans and wildlife, farmers need to understand the effects and abandon the usage of pesticides in order to save the environment by appealing to officials, farmers, and Americans in her 1962 book, Silent Spring. She positions her defense by using rhetorical devices such as rhetorical questioning to establish logos, juxtaposing ideas, and using connotative and denotative diction.
According to the article on npr.org, Rachel Carson wrote a book by the name of “Silent Spring” where she received multiple attacks by the chemical and agricultural industry. After World War II, the government needed to eradicate insects and other types of pest by fumigating with pesticides farms and houses. In the book, Carson explained the consequences to the environment and human health by using these pesticides. For this reason, she described as a hysterical person who was unqualified as a scientist and if people would follow her book, the world would go back were insects and diseases were dominating the Earth. Rachel was misguided because her intention with the book was not to stop using pesticides but from
In conclusion, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring set up the structure of the environmental movement. There are so many different groups and organizations in the environmental movement, this variety is good, whether they are conservative or liberal, they are fighting for the same thing, to stop environmental injustices of some
Rachel Carson created a book named Silent Spring, which is a book mainly focused on how pesticides are dangerous for the environment, used Gathering Data through All Senses to innovate how to create a relationship between humans and nature that allows for development of both, and made an impact on society by starting the argument of how humans' activities impact
Rachel Carson was a Marine Biologist and a conservationist who wrote Silent Spring, which helped revolutionize modern environmental conservation. She was born on May 27, 1907 in Springdale, PA. Her mother had a vast love for nature which was bequeathed down to Carson. She graduated from Pennsylvania College for Women in 1927 with a major in Marine Biology and later got her M.A. from John Hopkins in Zoology on the year of 1932. Initially, she wrote pamphlets on conservation and natural resources while editing scientific journals, but after World War II and recognizing the effects of synthetic chemicals after the war, she “reluctantly changed her focus in order to warn the public about the long-term effects of misusing pesticides” (Rachelcarson.org, 5). In 1962, she published Silent Spring and although she was attacked by the pesticide, chemical, and some governmental industries, she promptly inspired a new generation globally to appreciate
NPR News published an article about Rachel Carson and her effect on the world. They mentioned the accusations presented towards her by Edwin Diamond. Who commented on how her findings were inaccurate and based on Rachel's own personal emotions. Saying that she claimed all pesticides are harmful and should have a ban placed on them. However, contrary to his believes she was trying to convey to the world her scientific knowledge about the effects of pesticides in our environment. Especially towards the diminishing populations of migratory birds. Her studies showed that some herbicides and pesticides were finding their way into the wetlands. Polluting the waterways and causing havoc on the ecosystem. In her book (Silent Spring) Rachel was trying
The environmental movement is closely related with the appearance of environmental awareness. Before 1960, very few people knew the term ecology. Environmental concerns were absent in the political and social spheres. However, a groundbreaking book by Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, was published in 1960 and large numbers of people became aware of the consequences of humans’ encroachment upon the nature in terms of the use of highly toxic chemicals like
Silent Spring by Rachel Carson was originally published in September of 1962. I was drawn to this book, because it contained many radical ideas, especially for the time, and it was instrumental in launching the environmental movement. With Silent Spring, Rachel Carson was able to make revolutionary changes in the laws affecting the air, land, and water. Many reviews consider it to be “one of the landmark books of the twentieth century”. Carson shows the hazards of the chemicals by painting a picture of an ideal landscape that gets torn to pieces, and the aftermath the wildlife and humans are left to deal with. Throughout the chapters she always refers back to the birds, and other wildlife telling how they are affected and continue to be affected
Silent Spring by Rachel Carson is a revolutionary part of the environmentalist’s history. Caron’s last novel written, published in 1962, is a plea to the American people to look at what insecticides are doing to our nation, and with that, our earth. Her first chapter sets the scene, and brings readers to a fictitious city that all Americans can try to relate to by writing, “There was once a town in the heart of America where all life seemed to live in harmony with its surroundings. Then a strange blight crept over the area and everything began to change. The birds, for example—where had they gone? It was a spring without voices.” (Carson 1-2) The reason behind the lack of birds is revealed to readers to be part of a larger problem in poisonous chemicals, in the form of insecticides, which hurt our ecosystem for a temporary fix to pests.
Heralded on the fiftieth anniversary addition’s cover as “the classic that launched the environmental movement,” Rachel Carson’s opus Silent Spring examines the impact of man-made chemical pest control substances on the environment during the 1950s. Carson references an extensive bibliography of empirical research to back up testimonials and a great deal of qualitative data she uses to flesh out her book.
Environmentalism is the belief in which one advocates for environmental preservation. In Rachel Carson’s narrative Silent Spring, she gives her activist insight on the use of toxic chemicals for the benefit of humanity by exposing the detrimental effects these toxins bring. In comparison to Carson, I perceive myself to have developed my perception of nature through books however, my culture did not allow me to have a one on one interaction with nature. Carson fails to comprehend how traditional values potentially promote an anthropocentric ideology that attributes to the way humans treat the natural world. The author’s modes of argumentation mirror my own perception of nature only to a certain extent because she fails to mention the
The dominant theme of Silent Spring by Rachel Carson is the powerful and detrimental impact humans have on the natural world. Carson 's main argument is that pesticides have harmful effects on the environment and lead to a loss of biodiversity and quality of life. Carson uses the pesticide DDT throughout the book as she examines the effects of pesticides throughout the United States. Though the majority of the book is focused on the effects of pesticides on our ecosystem processes, she also touches on cases of pesticide poisoning, cancer, and other diseases caused by DDT and other chemicals that affect humans directly.
The advent of industrialization and mankind's insatiable quest to devour nature has resulted in a potentially catastrophic chaos. The race against time to sate the ever-increasing numbers of hungry stomachs has taken toll on the environment. Man has tried to strip every resource Earth has to offer and has ruthlessly tried to eliminate any obstruction he perceived. Nature is an independent entity which has sustained and maintained the balance existing within it. Traditionally, spring season hosts the complete magnificence of nature in full bloom. It is evident in the very first chapter when Rachel Carson talks about a hypothetical village which was the epitome of natural rural beauty and was a delightful scenery for the beholder. The village was surrounded by wilderness with abundant flora and fauna. The charming village soon faced the wrath of a creation having chronic devastating effects which changed the surroundings forever. Insects died, followed by birds, and other animals. Soon even humans suffered with ailments, succumbed to unexplained illness' and generations thereafter bore the brunt of the past. Yearning for a better yield, farmers used pesticides and herbicides to cure crops of unwanted pests. They remained unaware of the diabolical and indestructible substances they had
A decade before Greenpeace was established, leading environmentalist and biologist, Rachel Carson, published Silent Spring which shed light for the first time on the effects of pesticides. It challenged the belief that insecticides would not be harmful for people and animals. The impact industrialization had on the environment and on people’s health, such as smog and pollution, was also brought up in the book. In the latter part of the 1960’s, Ralph Nader, a consumer activist, helped to make the environment a mainstream issue by ensuring that everybody