preview

Rachel Carson Controversy

Decent Essays

In the 21st century, society has more concern for nature than ever before. On every corner you see a recycling bin or something that helps to preserve the nature around us. It’s hard to believe that in the 1960s people were destroying it so easily. Rachel Carson wrote a game changing book titled Silent Spring. As a woman of the sexist 60s, Carson wasn't held too highly in the eyes of scientist and men of power. However, when her book was published, people rushed to buy it. Scientist read it to prove her wrong while others read it to gain knowledge about what was happening around them. According to Neil Goodwin, Carson brought into question the integrity of the pesticide industry. The book set up the beginning to a change of normal practices …show more content…

Carson does an excellent job detailing the devastation of not only the land, but the wildlife as well. In her effort to persuade nature enthusiast, she uses the best example of the sagebrush lands. As college students looking back on what it was like in the 1960s, it is easy to see how Carson would have easily persuaded her audience; she still has an impact today on the preservation of nature. The sagebrush lands were destroyed, not because of a pest problem, but simply for the reason that the cattlemen wanted grasslands instead. Animals and plants suffered just so grass could be grown. Martin J. Walker describes, in his article The Unquiet Voice of ‘Silent Spring’: The Legacy of Rachel Carson, that her book analyzes the damage which pesticides were causing to the “...environment, wildlife, and inhabitants…” Nothing else would have appealed better to nature enthusiast than that. They could see the destruction of nature, but to read exactly how detrimental spraying was, is probably the most persuasive thing Carson could have used. Carson’s use of cost-benefit analysis was and still is the most impactful persuasive strategy she employed in her tale of

Get Access