Reaction Paper On Deviant

Acceptance and comprehension of behaviors, not only in the United States, but also in many different countries has come to be an argument that does not have a clear end. Sociologists and even politicians have been discussing how something that in the past was unacceptable, in the modern world is seen as normal and beneficial for society. For example, marriage in couples of the same sex, people and even the Supreme Court have been discussing the idea of giving these people the right to be married and have the same benefits as a “normal” couple. Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who was an American politician and sociologist wrote a whole essay on these topics, entitled: “Defining Deviancy Down” written in 1993. He presented to the United States and

In our everyday society, we see things but pretend to be blind, we hear things but pretend to be deaf, we taste freedom but pretend to live in hell, we smell corruption but pretend to live in heaven, and we touch others sorrow but pretend to be emotionless. What is becoming of our society you ask? We are becoming more lenient towards deviancy as time progresses, meaning that we are departing from the norm.

One norm I encounter in my own life is the use of no electronics at the dinner table. One sanction that is used for disobedience is getting that electronic either taken away until the end of dinner, or for the rest of the

The research done in this paper provides a better understanding of deviance and social control. There are various factors to research on the topic to develop a complete understanding of the two ideas. Specifically, the goal is to identify factors that directly impact deviance and social control and if one can exist without the other. These topics provide a better understanding of the human behavior and actions because of social control and societal norms. The focus of this discussion is to provide a detailed analysis of societal norms, deviance, and social control. I have used supporting research and my own personal ideas to develop the findings in this paper. It has become evident that without societal norms there would be no social

The four theories of deviance are The Learning Theory, The Strain Theory, The Social-Bond Theory and the Labeling Theory. These theories alone can explain the reasoning behind someone’s deviant behavior. But, in There Are No Children Here we see all of these theories being demonstrated. This lets us have an understanding of exactly why we are seeing the deviant behavior that we are.

I decided to break a social norm in my house by asking my parents for their permission before doing anything in my own house, for example I would ask to use the restroom or if it was okay for me to get a drink. I only asked for permission to preform those two tasks. After a day it was very obvious to everyone in my home that something was going on with me, but when confronted about what I was doing by my family I refused to conform to their group pressure and inform them. Everyone in my household urged me to conform and stop asking such ridiculous questions; conformity is behavior in accordance with socially accepted conventions or standards. Examples of conformity can be found everyday in life from the way we dress to the way we talk, a specific example is when one persons’ clapping

After this experiment, I learned that it is frightening to go against the unspoken rules of society. It is uncomfortable to participate in deviant behavior, especially when you are cognizant of how others are viewing you. Conducting this norm violation taught me that it is much easier to conform. Deviance can be functional to society, as the functional theories of deviance hold, and deviance can also be the cause of labeling and stigmatizing others, as some symbolic theories of deviance hold. In general, it can be agreed that no one wants to be the person committing the deviance because it will be accompanied by criticism. Anyone who breaks society’s norms is a very brave individual. For certain rules in today’s society, we need more courageous people who will challenge the norms. However, as far as staying quiet in the library goes, I think that rule can

In my Norm Violation assignment I chose to break the common dining etiquette norm of eating with your hands. Since eating with your hands is only deviant behavior in certain dining situations, I chose to break this norm at a local sit-down restaurant in Eugene, Café Soriah. I went to the downtown restaurant with a group of friends for an afternoon meal without telling them of my Norm Violation assignment. Being the only informed one in the experiment seemed like the best way to get the most candid reactions from my peers.

Whether we choose to admit it or remain completely oblivious, our world is composed of social norms that govern our everyday actions. Everything from brushing our teeth to wearing appropriate clothing in public is predetermined and dictated by society. Violation of these established rules inevitably earn an individual a label of “weird,” “abnormal” or “deviant.” The concept of deviance as been debunked by a plethora of scholars—many of whom have adopted an anthropological perspective on the issue. Collectively, their theories and arguments portray the intricacy of the deviant phenomenon and its embedment within

Throughout life, in any society we develop a sense to conform and adjust to our surroundings but why? Our values in our society determines our norms and why we do the things we do. I recently sought out to break these social conformities that violated the values, and norms we hold as a society. Every society is different and, in every society there are different and similar values, norms, sanctions folkways, and mores. Breaking them up and analyzing them we began to understand why these terms and values are so important to us.

Rules will have their places in life, and peer pressure can ruin it. So keep your eyes closed, or life will get back at you. During 1692 Salem, Massachusetts, speaking to another person while passing by was frowned upon as Arthur Miller describes it in The Crucible. The desire to be noticed and popular among a group of cheerleaders in Le Roy, New York, caused many problems as Susan Dominus expresses in the article What Happened to the Girls in Le Roy. Being popular and staying with what everyone else did was every girl in a Mean Girls clip by Rosalind Wiseman. Peer pressures and societal pressures are huge influences to human decision making as shown in The Crucible, the article “What Happened to the Girls in Le Roy”, and the clip Mean Girls.

On April 12th, 2017 at 5:15 in the afternoon I attended an alcoholics anonymous (AA) meeting located inside a catering building, Gardens at Sunset. This AA meeting was entitled, “Wednesday Eleven Step Group”. When I initially pulled up to the site I was confused as to where the actual meeting would be held, an abandoned hotel was on the left and a brightly painted blue building on the right. I almost left for I feared the safety of my car. However, a woman in her fifties pulled up behind me and after introducing myself to her, she informed me that the meeting would be upstairs in the blue building. Despite the harsh outward appearance of the meeting site, the inside was warm and comforting. The AA meeting was held in a loft above the catering

Within any culture lies an array of definitive demeanors and actions that are deemed socially adequate and inadequate. Depending on the distinguishing behavior of a given individual and the society that they live in, there are invisible “laws” that prevent people from acting a certain way. If the individual’s behavior is adverse to the superior, predominant norms of their society, the actions of that individual are considered to be deviant. Social deviance in shown in a variety of dissimilar faces: within physical appearance, actions done to oneself and others, and religious groups.

Defining deviance as behaviour, which violates consensual social norms, also raises the questions of whose norms? Why are some norms more important than others? And why do some norms appear to serve the interests of capitalist governments and the powerful? .

In 1995, O.J. Simpson, a popular sports player and public figure, was accused of the double homicide of Ron Goldman and his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson. Within the following months, the trial became increasingly popular as the celebrity’s case deepened. Due to its popularity, the case revealed many aspects that shocked and confounded the public. Consequently, the issue of race arose within what was viewed as the most shocking component of the trial: the verdict. As the infamous O.J. Simpson verdict reached America, the reaction caused a polarizing effect on the racial view of Simpson between white and black communities.