Guy de Maupassant, an author, is famous for having an unpredictable twist in his stories and this is exactly what he portrayed in The Necklace. So, who this is Guy de Maupassant? Already we can assume by his name that he is French. Henri Rene Albert Guy de Maupassant named at birth was conceived to an affluent family at the Chateau de Miromesnil in France on the 5th of August, 1850. When Guy was eleven his parents separated *why* which as a result left his mother to raise both him and his younger brother alone. His mother was in love with literary work and so she passed on her passion to her two sons. As Guy got older he enlisted as a volunteer in the Franco-Prussian War in 1870 – 1871 which contributed to many of his short stories which is usually based on the tragedies and suffering of the many innocent lives caught in this …show more content…
In this time, there were three major class ranging from the highest Gentry Class where, Middle Class and the lowest Peasantry Class. These social class were determined by the family to which one was born. This means that if you were born into the peasantry class it would be impossible to go into the middle class or any other higher than your own. So therefore, someone like Mrs. Loisel whose family were artisans who are known as someone who practices a trade or handicraft. They were considered as the lowest on the social ladder, it was unlikely that Mathilde would have the finest things she so desires. Even though Mathilde wants to be associated with a higher class so badly, she was aware that switching rarely happens. Therefore, she had no other choice than marry within her class. She married Mr. Loisel, a man who was employed as a clerk within the Ministry of Education. The French are role models for many countries and so does Mathilde. **** She keeps comparing herself to persons higher than her
That is to say that in “The Necklace,” Mathilde’s perception of herself as a woman of higher social standing lead to her losing the one thing she had going in life, her true beauty. “It is Madame Loisel 's desire to be part of the upper class which sets the story 's events in motion” (Hatboro and Horsham). Mathilde is described as a beautiful woman who finds her life to be not up to her standards because she is not a part of the higher class. “She had no
The Necklace, a short story written by Guy de Maupassant, is about a greedy woman in poverty, who learns that being selfish can hurt her and others around her. Her greedy behavior indicates that she has been struggling during her years in poverty. When she scrambled to find out her purpose in life, she portrayed anger and malevolence towards others.
‘The Necklace’ is a morality tale written by Guy de Maupassant where he portrays the life of a beautiful but dissatisfied girl named Mathilde who desires to live a luxurious life despite being born into a clerk’s family and marrying a clerk too. Mathilde’s discontentment in life instigates her to pretend someone rich that she is not. Moreover, it leads her to severe trouble that caused ten years of hardship to Mathilde and her husband. So, this suffering is a punishment for Mathilde which taught her a lesson and changed her dramatically over the course of the story by making her a person of completely different personality for whom appearances
Feeling trapped in a life that she does not want or appreciate because she lacks the finer things already presents the negative impact it has on her. Her life is comfortable, yet the appearance of her walls and furniture is not high-class enough for her, damaging not only her happiness but also her own self worth. Another description of Mathilde states, “She had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that; she felt made for that. She would so have liked to please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after” (1). Mathilde not only wants to have money to selfishly better her own social life but in her dreams of being wealthy, she does not seem to want to do anything more impactful with it. Her focus on the material things such as dresses and jewels traps her in a bubble where she can only be the person she aspires to be if she has items that can be acquired with more money. This will never bring her true happiness or fulfillment because even if she does become incredibly wealthy, she will always want more or to be at a higher class. Mathilde’s dreams become especially impossible to reach when she accidentally loses her upscale friend’s supposed diamond necklace and goes into debt buying an identical one to return back to her friend. Mathilde’s life turns into days full of labor trying to earn back the money and the narrator states, “That dreadful debt must be paid.
In The Necklace, Guy De Maupassant creates a suffering tone. He uses diction to further describe words and give better meaning to his statements, irony to tie the story together and give dramatic surprises, and imagery to show you what Mathilde (the wife) is dreaming of our talking about. He uses all of these literary devices to support the tone that is created throughout the story.
“She would have liked so much to please, to be envied to be charming, to be sought after” (5). Mathilde’s character is always striving to have others see her outside of her reality, to have someone think of her to be in a higher class of society. De Maupassant uses the class separation to intensify Mathilde’s desires versus reality. She often refers to not having
12-13). Also, her intense unhappiness cannot be lifted with one party invitation. Another notable behavior on Mathilde is low self-esteem: “She had a rich friend, a comrade from convent days, whom she did not want to see anymore because she suffered so much when she returned home. ”(7, par. 7). The readers notice that Mathilde is an envious person, but she put away her envious behavior and looks for her friend who lends her a necklace.
Do you know a materialistic person, who only cares about money? Do you like this person? Usually, people like this are not so friendly, just like Mathilde was. But in this case, Mathilde was able to change, and we can see this by some facts in the text; she was arrogant and materialistic, then became a motivated and comprehensive, and also she was lazy, but in the final she became a very hard worker woman. Mathilde actions and attitudes changes are very complex, but with these two things as support, it is possible to make this change very clear to understand.
The narrator paints a mostly sympathetic picture of Mathilde. I think this because at the start it makes you feel bad for Mathilde by describing her as “one of those pretty charming girls, born, as if by an accident of fate, into a family of clerks”. Later the author makes you feel bad for her by saying “She has no evening clothes, no jewels, nothing”. This continues
The author’s name is Guy de Maupassant. He was born in 1850, and he died in 1893.
This shows that Mathilde is born to be luxurious, but instead is born into a low class family. It has been established that Mathilde wants a lot more than what she has. Mathilde fantasizes about wealth. The
First of all, Mathilde should accept her social class because her honor does not depend on her social class but on her beauty and her intellectually capacity. People are not respected because they are rich or poor, the beauty of each person is determinant in how people will respect him. Especially for women in the Mathilde’s society “there was neither caste nor rank, for beauty, grace and charm take the place of family and birth” (Maupassant). Since Mathilde had a natural beauty, she should not care about her class. Her
She finds that the unjust treatment she had was being born into no dowry and no mediocre social status. In this quote, she herself believes that she deserves better, “She suffered endlessly, feeling she was entitled to all the delicacies and luxuries of life” (Maupassant, Page 1). Her views are her own internal conflict as Mathilde lacks a lot of resentment and is full of contentment with her ordinary life and falls under the punishment of poverty at the end. She then uses the mask of perseverance to at least receive a tiny piece of pity or reward from both her friends and higher class society, whom she envied quite lots. Her persona of being a hard-worker puts her under a good light, an aura that makes her look good. This helps lessen the weight of her already existing problem, giving her a bit of hope to keep going at her simplistic
Her social status was very poor they lived in a shack with old outdated furniture and was always depressed and crying about something that was not very bad or important. Mathilde was a pretty girl who worked as a minor store clerk in the Ministry of Education and did not earn much money which she could not buy nice clothes and she was always unhappy. Her social status was poor to medium class and her and her husband were not able to attend nice receptions or balls.She had to barter and borrow a lot of things so she could look decent. The way she was able to go to the reception was she had to borrow a nice dress and some fine jewelry from her best friend.
Mr. Loisel was obviously excited the day that The Chancellor of Education had invited them to an exquisite dinner. Surely he thought that this was finally a way that he could provide an outlet for Mathilde's deepest desires. Unfortunately, instead of being thrilled as he had predicted, Mathilde acted like a spoiled child, throwing the invitation on the table. "She had no decent dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but these; she believed herself born only for these" (5). She couldn't have been more manipulative than when she began to cry about not having anything to wear. Of course Mr. Loisel suddenly fell into her trap and suddenly decided to give her all of the money in his savings account to buy her a new dress. Most would assume that she'd be satisfied at this point; her husband has just made a huge financial sacrifice for her. However, as time drew near to the night of the party, she became insecure and restless because she thought she would look poor if she didn't have any fancy jewels to wear; she thought she'd look like a beggar. `I'd almost rather not go to the party (30)", she said.