Reflective Essay: Breaking The Law

“Ignorance of the law is no excuse”. That’s the standard line drivers hear when they say didn’t have any knowledge of the speed limit, or gun owners hear when they say weren’t aware about the gun laws in the jurisdiction they happened to get apprehended. Still that ignorance is quite understandable in an America where precisely about everything is being criminalized. As citizens, we’re expected to have the knowledge of all of these laws and obey them.

Obstructions, including bicycle racks, shrubbery, parked vehicles, merchandise displays and trash cans, must not be present in the accessible space, access aisles or along the access route. Make sure that everything is out of the way and that the entire route is clear of accumulated leaves, trash or other debris.

Traditionally, the positive image of a company or a brand is very important in the contemporary world. As a result, the question of morality of each individual working within an organization is of a paramount importance. In such a situation there should be no exceptions from the rule and executives could not be in a privileged position. This is the desirable ideal many companies strive to achieve at least in a public eye. However, the reality turns to be quite different from what is expected and the analyzed case of an executive’s double standard is just another evidence of the fact that the real life is so complicated that the common rules, including moral

In the case of Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), the Supreme Court ruled that a law may not punish a status; i.e., one may not be punished to being an alcoholic or for being addicted to drugs. However, of course, one may be punished for actions such as abusing drugs. The question becomes; What if the status “forces” the action? What if a person, because of his/her addiction to drugs, is “forced” by the addiction to purchase and abuse the illegal drugs? Would punishing that person be unfairly punishing a status?

Since the vast majority of students that attend college drives a car, Miami Dade College had to find a place where students could park their car without taking the risk of being towed or ticketed. So the college administration allied at a first instance with Miami-Dade County to let the students park at the 117th avenue which is right behind the college buildings. The real problem came when the Miami-Dade County didn’t let them park there anymore. Consequently, MDC had to find another place to let them park, so they moved the parking site to the International Mall, which is about 3 miles from the campus buildings. Finally they got an agreement with IKEA to use the upper parking of the

Parking shall comply with ANSI A117.1 and IBC regulations, including required number of accessible parking stalls. Per IBC Chapter 11, 5% of total parking spaces, but not less than 1 space, shall be made accessible. And for every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one space shall be a van-accessible parking space.

Parking as described seems to be an afterthought. As stated it should be masked from the sidewalk, and laid out in a manner that it can be converted to other uses. Mainly they discuss off street parking, masked parking garages, and back alleys that should be no more than 24 feet wide max to include utilities, back garages, and trash

Protection of the public is crucial throughout the entirety of the project. Jake Jabs College of Business and Entrepreneurship is being constructed on a very busy campus, in a populated area. Controlling and detouring traffic, people, and parking around the site properly will be of grave concern. The entire construction site will be enclosed in 6 ft. high chain link fence and where pedestrian safety is exclusively endangered outside this area, barricades will be placed to inform persons of possible safety hazards. If any visitors are brought to the project site, proper safety orientation will be successfully completed and they will wear proper PPE.

     The use of deadly force is used throughout the U. S. , and the definition of deadly force is best described by the FBI which states that : deadly force is the intentional use of a firearm or other instrument resulting in a high probability of death. But who determines when it’s okay for a police officer to use deadly force?

I think that its never ok to break the law under any circumstance But I think the state and us government have way to much power. I think that state government are taking away are right for free speech and putting outrage's regulations on us. I think that we should be able to have free speech we can say what we want as long as its is no harm to other people. The government is taking away part of are first amendment right the right for free speech. And I will not stand for this. People should be able to voice there options and people need to learn how to deal with it instead of acting like children about. If people are disobeying laws they should be punished but I do not think its right for the government to make outrages laws that are unconstitutional

Is it right to break to law? In sertant places yes others no. I say this because sometime you have to for example if you have a medical condition and no median works but pot does then break the law so you get better. But if you break the law like killing someone just because you feel like it then no i believe though kind of people should be locked up for good. For many people of the world they have to break the law to either make there life better for them or there family. Others do it because they think its fun and dont care about anyone but them self. I feel do what you have to do to make your life better that doesn't hurt and dont put others in danger. If people would be more concerted to other and not try to harm others then we wouldn't have to worry about if it was

Nemeth, C.P. (2001). Law & evidence: a primer for criminal justice, criminology, law, and legal studies. NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

In regards to the Fire Prevention Code, the entire building will remain within a one hundred fifty foot arc from a fire hydrant. All curbs will be painted red with a four inch (4”) white lettering stating “FIRE LANE – NO PARKING –TOW AWAY ZONE”. Wording will not be spaced more than fifteen feet apart. We will have to instruct our manager that no one can abandon or close the fire lanes without written permission of the Fire Official of the City of College Station. Not doing so, will risk any officer issuing a citations for any motor vehicle, trailer, or boat found parked, unattended in the fire

When it comes to large sums of money, it is not uncommon for the spender to feel they have been ripped off or become over protected. The practice of law is no exception to this phenomenon, and crocked lawyers and paralegals have negatively contributed to the notion. On several occasions law professionals have taken client money for personal use, acting against the law and rules of professional conduct. Although lawyers and paralegals have their own individual rules and guidelines to abide by, they follow the same professional structure of proper conduct. The rules of conduct for paralegals is governed by the Law Society of Upper Canada and is the governing body responsible for reports of misconduct. Further investigations will lay out the proper procedures and tasks that must be completed when a paralegal encounters an accusations of misconduct, specifically when a client accuses a paralegal of misappropriating money from the clients trust fund. When it comes to possible options it is important to remember that by proactively sending a report of the circumstance to the Law Society of Upper Canada with a detailed list of events, bookkeeping and accounts billed to the client will help your case prior to the client reporting you to the Law Society. Should a paralegal choose to ignore the threat of the client, in hopes that the client will not follow through with higher involvement, the paralegal will then face an audit by the Law Society. If the Law Society is apprised that the

The first code is labeled Standard 1: Legal Compliance. This code states that an educator must abide by state, federal, and local laws and includes but is not limited to the