Relations Between The United States And Mexico

Mexico and the United States are countries that have several aspects to relate and compare the differences that exist between them. Each country has its own characteristics, and is a way of being able to identify to other countries. In this case, Mexico and United States are independent parents with an extensive history where we can know aspects of each one of them. Mexico is characterized by being a country of religious traditions and U.S. for being the first world power. In addition to the above, it is important to highlight the differences existing between the countries of Mexico and United Stated as well as their similarities.

This year’s election cycle brought heated debates and discussions about many things; “the wall”, free trade, NAFTA, immigration issues, borders security and policy issues. Regardless of which side of the political isle you stand, which way the political winds sway in Washington D.C., one thing is certain not to change with the election cycle, and that is, the actual physical border between The United States and Mexico. Therefore, if we can’t change that, and we can’t, then there needs to be solutions to problems that continue to exist between the two sovereign countries. Trade and Security are two of the most important factors for neighboring countries and they must not be ignored. Beyond just good political, diplomatic, and strategic vision it is important to understand there are cultural, education and diversity complexities which takes tremendous and often times delicate maneuvering to come together for the greater good of both economies and governments, as millions of people rely on successful trade agreements and security.

Mexico is beautiful warm country located in Central America. Mexico has a representative democratic republic, and are currently being run by Enrique Pena Nieto their current president. The criminal and civil laws between the united states and mexico very in many areas; this forces the differences and similarities in the way the court systems function.

On the South Western border of the United States roughly 2000 immigrants cross the border illegally from Mexico every day. The vast majority of these immigrants are seeking financial security and a safer life in the United States however, some are coming over to traffic weapons and drugs for gangs and cartels. It is these few individuals that have caused the U.S. government to pursue a multi-billion dollar defense along the border.

“The most dramatic event in the history of relations between Mexico and the United States took place a century and a half ago.” (Document C, Paragraph 1) The Mexican War started in 1846, and ended in 1848. President Polk and Texas agreed that the Texas-Mexico border was the Rio Grande River. But when President James K. Polk heard Mexicans were the first to fire upon Americans at Texas, America was prepared to go to war. The majority of Congress agreed on the war vote too. In the Senate, the votes were 40 to 2, and in the House of Representatives it was 174 to 14. “Restless spirits, discontented at home … joined them ….” (Document D, Paragraph 3) Though the Mexicans were the first to start the war, the Americans had a play in it too. There are many different perspectives on the Mexican War, and many people wonder if it was reasonable or not. One opinion is that the United States was unjustified in going to war with Mexico because America robbed Mexico, invaded Mexican territory, and took advantage of Mexico’s offers.

The United States and Mexico share a boundary line that has many complex issues that are in constant flux. Both countries are dependent on each other for safety and economics. In addition, both countries have had conflicts in the past that include the Mexican American War and revolutions that have bled into each other’s territory. This essay’s goal is to demonstrate the boundary issues between the United States and Mexico. These issues include an ambiguous border line, water rights, and environmental issues. These matters are a pressing concern because they create hostilities between the governments and citizens of each country.

When looking at the history between the United States and Latin America, you see many interactions between them, all that aided the relationship that they have today. Despite that the United States and Latin America are in the same part of the world, the beliefs in which they govern may differ. This difference has often been seen playing a major role in the disputes that have occurred in past. The United States and Latin America have faced many social, economical and governing barriers in forming a strong and positive relationship in the early twentieth century, this is due to the differences that the two had between cultures and the constant demand for power. However, the two countries have found ways to meet in the middle of their cultural differences, to form an equally fair relationship.

The President of Mexico has the weakness of shrinking the country’s economy by 63% with the loss of the drug business. He would have to find a way to rebuild the economy of the country with no drugs, which we essentially lead to the country going through a depression. On the other hand, the President has the United States can be used as an ally because the United States is Mexico’s largest drug market. Both of these countries want to eliminate illegal drugs in general, therefore this commonality is strength for Mexico.

Mexico is one of the most populated and industrialized of the third world nations, yet it remains very impoverished in comparison to it’s northern neighbor. Recently Mexico has been the third largest trading partner of the United States, has become an important exporter of petroleum and plays a pivotal role in the politics of the region. Yet Mexico is frequently treated with neglect and misunderstanding by the United States. This treatment is why Mexico is hesitant about United States influence and investment in Mexico. While many foreign countries acknowledge the United States as a

The Border disputes between the United States of America and Mexico is an issue that has perpetuated since the 1840s with the dispute starting in 1845 between Spanish and British rivalries. The political side of this argument is that both nations have contradicting territorial claims with the causes being illegal immigration, cultural differences, drug trafficking and poor border maintenance. There have been many stakeholders attempting to solve this issue including a variety of groups, individuals and governments. These stakeholders include; Homeland Security, Enrique Morones and the US and Mexican governments. In this report, these solutions will be evaluated through the criteria of economical sustainability. This means the usage of various

In order to achieve and sustain a positive relationship with another county it is essential to understand their culture. Culture is defined as the aspects of a society that separate them from the rest of the world, such as through language, beliefs, customs, traditions and government (Nowaczyk, n.d.). Mexico is a country in South America that the United Stated has a very strong relationship with. We share a 2000 mile border so a two-sided relationship is very important between us because it has a direct impact on the lives of over a million Americans. Because of this, the United States and Mexico have been able to endure a steady relationship over many decades.

In my opinion, the best way to resolve this dispute between the propose of Donald Trump and Mexico is letting the things like they were.

Data taken from the World Bank database show a shift in the economic relations between the United States, China, and the major economies of Latin American region; Brazil and Argentina. This pattern suggests that, while China increases its presence in Latin America, the United States loses its role as major trading partner, primary source of funding, and predominant political influence in the region.

The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has become more integrated and willing to cooperate within the global political and economic systems than ever in its history. However, there is growing apprehension in the Asia-Pacific region and the U.S. in regards to the consequences of rising in economic and military power in China. Descriptions about Chinese diplomacy in the policy and scholarly are less positive lately concerning China’s obedience to regional and international rules. There was little debate in the U.S. and elsewhere in regards to whether China was or was not part “the international community.” Scholars and experts in the early 1990s have contended

China is convinced that the U.S. is trying to draw ASEAN or some of its members together with Australia, Japan and South Korea into a soft alliance to constrain if not contain it. China  alleges that tacit US support has emboldened the Philippines and Vietnam to challenge China’s claims and actions.