Children are often highly dependent on other people to learn about the world around them. Many domains of information, such as history, religion, and science, are difficult or impossible to acquire independently. However, information from others is not guaranteed to be correct, and sources differ vastly in both knowledge and intent. For example, a Biology teacher is likely a more knowledgeable source of scientific information than an English teacher, and a coach is likely a more trustworthy source of information about race preparation than a fellow competitor. Recent research suggests that children are not credulous consumers of communicated information, and, instead, are sensitive to indicators of source unreliability. As early as …show more content…
The selective learning literature clearly indicates that young children actively keep track of individual sources’ reliability and use that information to inform their learning decisions. The source monitoring literature, in contrast, characterizes young children as generally poor monitors of source-specific information, particularly when compared to older children and adults (e.g., Ackil & Zaragoza, 1995; Roberts & Blades, 1998). A secondary aim of the proposed study, therefore, is to reconcile the contradictory characterizations of young children’s source monitoring performance in the selective learning and source monitoring literatures. To address these aims, the proposed project will investigate the following questions: (1) Do children show enhanced source monitoring of unreliable individuals? (2) Do children show poorer learning of, and less confidence in, information presented by unreliable individuals? (3) Does children’s source monitoring of unreliable individuals directly predict their learning from such individuals? (4) Do related cognitive skills, such as executive function and theory of mind, relate to children’s source monitoring and learning from unreliable individuals? By answering these questions, the proposed project will integrate and inform the disparate literatures on young children’s source monitoring
To emphasize his point, Murray identifies the relevance of E.D. Hirsh Jr’s work on the importance of everyone having a body of core knowledge as a way of fostering reading speed and comprehension” (Hirsh, 235). Murray supports Hirsh’s main points that a person should be culturally literate about America and the West and that a person should be scientifically as well as geographically literate. However, he continues that these are items best learned in K-8 when young minds are open to myths and fables. At those ages young students are more able to absorb and learn names and dates. Traditionally, in the past, it seems that a person went to college to learn about history, science, art, music and literature. But having
There is no basis in the belief that children are “naturally curious” and that given a freedom-based education they will be productive (Koonce, 2015,
Rigid and divisive views from adults can be reflected in a child’s choice of language and expressed beliefs about groups in society. Children soak up all information given to them and to atmospheres and climates surrounding them. The school must make sure that the children are surrounded with
In the researcher’s opinion, “this could be as much about the long-term effects of having an unreliable world view as it is about a lack of self-control” (Kidd 871). So it is obviously extremely important for children to be raised in a trustworthy, dependable environment in order to learn self-control and to be able to use their willpower to self-regulate.
Children are motivated to learn and conform to the broader cultural and social norms that will help them function in society. In order to gauge these community norms, children have to gather information from a broad range of sources – not just their own families (Aboud 2008).
"The Greater Part of the Stories Current Today We Shall Have to Reject" The Influence of reading material and television on children's abilities to distinguish between what is true and not true
In order to function in a social world, acquiring a theory of mind is a fundamental component in a child’s early cognitive development (Premack & Woodruff, 1978; Wellman, 1990). Theory of mind (ToM) is the ability to understand the mental state of one’s self and others (Greene, Sandoval, & Bråten, 2016) and to comprehend and forecast others’ actions (Tager-Flusberg, Baron-Cohen & Cohen, 1993; Wellman & Lagattuta, 2000). When children begin to develop a theory of mind (ToM) they develop awareness that human behaviour is governed by belief, knowledge, memory and imagination that conflict with overt reality. However, while the notion of theory
Children are taught to have their own responsibility over their academics: writing down the notes they think they need to know,
“Good books have always caused people to think, and since few of us think alike, controversy is guaranteed” (Gallo). If a child is to think for themselves, they must learn about and consider other points of view. They must be able to form their own views of the world around them, and they cannot do that completely without needed information.
This area is linked in many different ways, building children’s social skills up because they are interacting with other children, learning to take turns and share with peers. They are building relationships and starting to become independent from their main carers.
Another way to help parents feel as if these observations are free of bias is by adding in quotes of what their child has said (Buurstra,
From a young age children are encouraged to inhibit critical thinking and go beyond expectations, advancing further than the formalities their parents aspire for them. All of so is encouraged until the child exhibits connotations that venture away from the parent or guardians’ standpoints. The parent chooses to blame outside influences (i.e. peers, teachers, etc), as the reason behind these thoughts and scrutinize the child as being corrupted.
Welty’s grows up treasuring her books and describes them as the keystones to her knowledge (880). This truth does not hold the same value with twenty-first-century children. Now kids can simply google the capital of Greece rather than plunging deep into a book about the rich culture and history of an entire civilization. No longer is the large majority of children dedicating hours of their time to reading books and expanding their knowledge horizon. Instead, children are often nose deep in their phones playing games and communicating with
There are many different things that shape the cognitive development of children. To begin with cognitive development is when a child develops how to process, solve problems, and start making decisions. Once they have learned this they take everything they have learned into their adolescence. An example, of what can shape the cognitive development of a child can be an educational game. Educational games can be very useful in shaping a child’s development because they are having fun while learning at the same time and what kid doesn’t like to play games, the fact that it is even educational makes it even better for them. Not only are they having fun but there are many different games that help in different categories of development in
The answer would be that the specific information isn’t what’s important. It’s the skills to take initiative and find this information, without having to be directed to do so, that is crucial. To unschoolers, it’s not a fault to not know the answer to a question or situation. Allowing children to explore and discover on their own presents them with a myriad of real-life problems for them to conquer. Solving them on their own equips them with valuable problem solving skills that they take with them into adulthood.