Resilience Research Paper

Resilience across a lifespan can happen many different ways from physical development to cognitive development. We also have social and emotional development. Throughout this paper resilience will be applied to all of the above mentioned concepts. Resilience across a lifespan is described through theories, measures, and even personality characteristics. Resilience has also been applied to the impacts of disasters and traumatic experiences in which will also be touched on throughout this paper. Resilience is discussed as to whether it is an inherited trait or whether it is a learned trait. Resilience can be found in everyone. Some people have more resilience due to life experiences which you will see explained throughout this paper as well.

Resilience, when asked to define and explain the act of being resilient, can be a hard thing to describe. It is something everyone must be at one point in their lives, and what some people must be every day. There are different levels to it, depending on what the person is going through at the time. However, resilience is commonly described as just staying strong in a tough situation or time in a person’s life. When something goes wrong, or something bad happens, the person affected doesn’t let it break them. They stand strong against whatever is being thrown at them, but they bend when they need to. Someone who is resilient is flexible, making sure they don’t crack under pressure. As Robert Jordan said in The Fires of Heaven, “The oak fought the wind and was broken, the willow bent when it must and survived.”

Resilience is defined as, “the ability to become strong, healthy, or successful again after something bad happens” (Merriam Webster par 1). Resilience is shown when people use their strength when dealing with adversity. When people are experiencing negative circumstances resilience may lead to positive outcomes (PBS Par 1).

Researcher define resilience as a broad cluster of personal characteristics that facilitate the ability to manage despite trauma. These characteristics include hardiness, optimism, self-enhancement, repressive coping, positive affect, and a sense of coherence (Agaibi & Wilson,2005; Bonanno, 2004; Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). Collectively, these characteristics permit such people to emerge from trauma with less psychological wounds and relatively unchanged.

“Resilience can be generally defined as the capacity to cope with life's setbacks and challenges” (Moen & Erickson, 1995). Although seemingly simple the concept of resilience is ever changing. Resilience levels differ from person to person. Sometimes traumatic events significantly affect people, While the other set of individuals who experienced the same traumatic event are seemingly ok. These inconsistencies are what led Dr. Williams to research this clinical issue repeatedly presented to her with sexual abuse victims. By investigating what causes some victims of sexual abuse to need more help than others, she can better personalize and adjust her services for each client. She can also implement systems similar to those already in place for those who are coping well with the

In the article, ’How People Learn to Become Resilient’, Maria Konnikova points out that some people have ability to be resilience more than others. The author explains that how people become more resilient. Moreover, Konnikova uses many resilience research example’s to focus on personal resilience. Konnikova talks about diversity of resilience and compares to different people’s system. The author claims that people can stimulate and control negative responses in their brain. The author believes that even people might be overemphasizing the responses. In conclusion, if you become durable standing on the bad situation, you will be more resilience than before.

The purpose of this analysis was to gather information from previous investigations on resilience from a variety of fields, synthesize the findings, and identify the critical attributes common to all. Then, filter through those attributes to find those distinct to an individual’s resilience and were necessary for resilience to take place.

Nevertheless, it should not be ignored that repeated exposure to distressing situations may not always result in stronger character. According to researcher Dr. Cohen -Silver, mental resilience is somewhat like exercising the body: “It cannot be develop without exercise and it breaks down when overworked. (You) cannot minimize in any way the pain of such events when you’re going through them. But it does appear that if you’ve had several such experiences but not too many, you can learn something.” As we face the challenges that come our way, we gain the ability to successfully endure whatever else there is in store. On the flipside, if these challenges become increasingly ubiquitous and beyond the capacity of what you can handle, your ability

This enlightening article from the APA help center, invites the reader to look at the possibility of a solution for some of the adversities and challenges we, as humans at times must endure. The skill of resiliency is a way for individuals adapt to life-changing situations and stressful conditions. Some of the factor of resiliency is the ability to make realistic plans, a positive outlook of yourself and abilities, competencies with language and problem-solving skills, and the aptitude to manage intense feelings and impulses.

Resilience is the concept to used to explain after an observation was made when some children were more ‘invulnerable’ then other children in same or similar hardships and adversities . Some were able to achieve their goals and move forward, whereas others went under. Resilience is an ability to ‘bounce back’ from adversities and it can create positive outcomes disregards the problem. Especially being resilient in health profession refers to the ability to maintain personal and professional wellbeing in the face of on going work stress and adversities. The researchers researched on resilience to find out how resilience is present in some people and whether the resilience is an innate character of the person or the result of a process of interaction with the environment. And is resilience can be taught or somehow imparted to others. After the observation was made the researchers have established the factors to establish the concept of resilience. The risk factors and the protective factors have been defined and the theory have been changed throughout the researches. By understanding the nature of the risk and

Another group believes both types of criteria must be considered when measuring resilience (Masten, 2001). The debate centers around whether internal criteria regarding adaptation, such as academic achievement, or external criteria regarding adaptation, such as levels of distress or psychological health, are more important, or whether both should be accounted for when determining levels of resilience (Masten, 2001). Initially, researchers thought resilience developed as a result of some remarkability found in children (Masten, 2001). Researchers eventually fond that resilience is actually common and can result from normal systems of adaptation (Masten, 2001). In normal functioning adaptive systems that remain protected, resilience can develop, even when children encounter harsh misfortunes (Masten, 2001). Masten (2001) discussed both variable-focused and people-focused approaches for

The author of this article provides a background overview of resilience and provides a theoretical framework of how it can help show ways to adapt to stress. This article is based on explaining how “resilience rests on an ecological-systems conceptual base that explains how people adapt to stress and maintain their daily functioning” (Greene, 2014, p. 937). In this article, resilience is seen as being able to recover from stress by using coping strategies. Based on past research, the author describes how the factors and views of resilience are limited. Therefore, there needs to be a better understanding of how to process the effects of resilience for both an organization and individual. A potential model to help describe the effects of resiliency

Research in this field has originated in two fields of traumatology (looking at adults) and developmental psychology (looking at children and youth). Early researches with adults mainly focused on identifying what led some individuals to avoid traumatic stress whereas in developmental psychology, researchers aimed to identify personal qualities, as self-esteem, differentiating children who had adapted positively to socioeconomic nuisance, abuse or neglect and tragic life events, from children showing comparatively poorer outcomes (Luthar, Cicchetti and Becker, 2000). However, the root of research in resilience shows some limitations to the early approaches.

Empirical researches have used different terms in referring to positive adaptation or human capacity and tendency for growth to adverse events, i.e. post traumatic growth (Foregard, 2013), stress-related growth (Park, Cohen, & Murch, 1996), perceived benefits (McMillen & Fisher, 1998), benefit finding (Helgelon, Reynolds, & Tomich, 2006) and collectively as adversarial growth (Linley & Joseph, 2004a). Davydov and his colleagues (2010) once stated that adversity differs on contextual severity, and one’s resilience may differ on such. As they added, mild adversity is characterized by regular daily hassles such as work stress while, extensive stress like bereavement is counted as strong adversity.

Resilience is described as the overcoming of adversity, whilst subtly changing, or dramatically transforming aspects of that adversity (Hart & Heaver, 2013). McGrath & Noble (2010) expands on this by describing that resilience is also coping with hardship, then being able to return to a state of well-being. Masten (2001) explains that resilience is the human capacity to be strengthened and transformed by life’s adversities and challenges, whilst exploring how resilience is a complex relationship of psychological inner strengths and environmental social supports.