preview

Review Of ' Rowling 's '

Decent Essays

Rowling 's use of "...own merits" indicates her desire to take a step back from the pressures of expectations piled upon her by society and from publishers. While Ms. Rowling 's experience was the opposite of Thelonious Monk 's, it reveals the pressure for an author to change their identity to fit a particular genre can be overwhelming, regardless of the level of respect one has earned in the literary world. In Rowling 's case, her writing style gave her away, and her authentic identity became uncovered after her first novel as Galbraith. Would readers ultimately have discovered the link between Stagg R. Leigh and Thelonious 'Monk ' Ellison if Monk 's ruse continued? Everett left the reader to ponder how Monk decided to handle his …show more content…

Leigh, who has a proven best seller novel, be black enough, man enough, whatever enough, to step in front of a camera? Media is precisely like Everett’s depiction. They want to alter someone into the person they believe will improve their ratings, sell their books, and so forth. Monk, as Stagg R. Leigh, sacrifices his convictions, moral standards, and intellect, to dumb-down himself to carry out the portrayal of the very slang, very raw, and very negatively stereotypical persona of a young black man who had supposedly penned the book Monk had intentionally written as a parody. Still, the character 's skin color was not black enough. Who sets the expectation of what is dark enough? Is it the media, or is it society? It is hard to determine what, or who, precisely is the driving force behind such demands. Is the media responsible for perpetuating the stereotype that the viewing audience, in both media and print, is perceiving? Or is it society which creates the demand for media to force a pseudo-identity onto a writer, otherwise penalizing a writer for standing firm in their choice of genre? The author of Erasure, Everett, in an interview with Matthew Dischinger, English professor at Louisiana State University, responded to a question about skin color and the foregrounding of race in critical conversations about his work by stating:
Race surfaces when race surfaces, but the characters don’t define

Get Access