preview

Rhetorical Analysis Of Dear Wearing Thin

Decent Essays

In Dear Wearing Thin, Sugar has the most formulated and effective argument over the other speakers because of her use of logos, expert testimony, and acknowledgement and response. The use of these rhetorical devices are more effective than the other speakers because while the other speakers did appeal to the audience 's emotions, emotions are irrational, therefore undercutting an argument, hurting the speakers ability to convince the audience.
With the use of expert testimony in combination with logos, Sugar’s argument surpasses those of the other speakers because her arguments are more based in one’s own personal experience and therefore can be put into perspective, helping to strengthen the logic of one’s own argument. Sugar …show more content…

Sugar and [Ms.Sugar] intend to start saving for college for the baby Sugars (Dear Wearing Thin).” By showing how Sugar herself can overcome her obstacles, she demonstrates to the audience, including Wearing Thin why her argument is stronger than Wearing Thin’s because despite Wearing Thin appealing to emotion when she says that, “[she is] often defined by [her] student loans (Dear Sugar).” Sugar is a prime example of why the opposite is true.
With the use of Acknowledgment and Response and logos, Sugar’s arguments supersedes those of the other speaker because with logic in combination with A&R, her argument is more clear and less fallacious than the other speakers. Often time the other speakers use an appeal to emotion which if used improperly, can become a logical fallacy. When Sugar says that “[Wearing Thin may] say [she’s] grateful to [her] parents for helping [her] pay for [her] undergraduate education,[she claims that Wearing Thin doesn’t] sound grateful to [her]. Almost every word in [her] letter tells [Sugar] that [she’s] pissed off that [she’s] being required to take over [her] student loan payments. (Dear Wearing Thin)” By acknowledging and then responding to what Wearing Thin says with a logical statement, her argument is elevated more than if she used an emotional or ethical appeal. The strength of acknowledgement and response in combination with logical is shown again when Sugar says, “[Wearing Thin’s parents] declined to continue to pay

Get Access