In Dear Wearing Thin, Sugar has the most formulated and effective argument over the other speakers because of her use of logos, expert testimony, and acknowledgement and response. The use of these rhetorical devices are more effective than the other speakers because while the other speakers did appeal to the audience 's emotions, emotions are irrational, therefore undercutting an argument, hurting the speakers ability to convince the audience.
With the use of expert testimony in combination with logos, Sugar’s argument surpasses those of the other speakers because her arguments are more based in one’s own personal experience and therefore can be put into perspective, helping to strengthen the logic of one’s own argument. Sugar
…show more content…
Sugar and [Ms.Sugar] intend to start saving for college for the baby Sugars (Dear Wearing Thin).” By showing how Sugar herself can overcome her obstacles, she demonstrates to the audience, including Wearing Thin why her argument is stronger than Wearing Thin’s because despite Wearing Thin appealing to emotion when she says that, “[she is] often defined by [her] student loans (Dear Sugar).” Sugar is a prime example of why the opposite is true.
With the use of Acknowledgment and Response and logos, Sugar’s arguments supersedes those of the other speaker because with logic in combination with A&R, her argument is more clear and less fallacious than the other speakers. Often time the other speakers use an appeal to emotion which if used improperly, can become a logical fallacy. When Sugar says that “[Wearing Thin may] say [she’s] grateful to [her] parents for helping [her] pay for [her] undergraduate education,[she claims that Wearing Thin doesn’t] sound grateful to [her]. Almost every word in [her] letter tells [Sugar] that [she’s] pissed off that [she’s] being required to take over [her] student loan payments. (Dear Wearing Thin)” By acknowledging and then responding to what Wearing Thin says with a logical statement, her argument is elevated more than if she used an emotional or ethical appeal. The strength of acknowledgement and response in combination with logical is shown again when Sugar says, “[Wearing Thin’s parents] declined to continue to pay
The most prevalent form of arguments that appears in Modern Romance is the use of logos, which helps offer trustworthy evidence to aid Ansari’s overall argument. The two fundamental arguments of logos are artistic proofs versus inartistic proofs. Conversely, Ansari weaves in countless examples of both forms in his book. Artistic proofs pertain to the “constructed argument having to do with appeals to reason and common sense; while
Our teacher, Mrs. Hetrick, provided the answer to our question: “These essays could have easily been generated by a computer program. They tell me nothing about yourselves; why in the world you are telling me all of this? You need to make me care about the message you are conveying, otherwise, your writing is useless.” She then told us that while we were all communicating in the proper format, we had failed to take into consideration whom our audience was. In order to truly persuade and influence our audience, we had to do more than place complicated ideas into a grammatically immaculate sentences; we need to show the audience why they should care about our writing; otherwise, they will just lose interest. I realize now that this experience provided a stable foundation for what I consider to be an example of passionate rhetorical ability, which helps me reflect on what authors Wallace deems as “good” through their rhetorical strategies.
The first chapter introduced the reader to the art of rhetoric. He describes how rhetoric works through real life examples. He demonstrates ways that rhetoric persuades us like, argument from strength, and seduction. He tells the reader that the sole purpose of arguing is to persuade the audience. He showed that the chief purpose of arguing is to also achieve consensus, a shared faith in a choice.
As you can see, from the opening of the letter, Carpenter et al. present a successful persuasive argument through the use of rhetorical appeals. They continue to use a mixture of rhetorical appeals and value/policy claims throughout the letter, which ultimately allows them to make a very successful and persuasive piece of writing. However, I feel that Carpenter et al.'s most successful appeals are those that combine or contain a mixture of both ethos and logos appeals. For example, they state "We recognize the natural impatience of people who feel that their hopes are slow in being realized. But we are convinced that these demonstrations are unwise and untimely" (2). This statement shows both an understanding and respect for other people's points of view, and although it is debatable as to whether they sincerely believed this or not, this statement contributes considerably to their ethos appeal and also presents a believable appeal (logos). The combined ethos and logical appeal increase their credibility as authors and allows them to instill
Aristotle has an idea that there are three rhetorical appeals people can use to persuade someone else – ethos, pathos and logos. Each of them is very useful and the persuasion will be most effective when three of them are all used. Amy Tan used all in “Mother Tongue.”
Persuasion is a key focus in many essays, stories, commercials, and other forms of media. There are many methods to this, one of which is rhetorical devices. Bell hooks, the author of Feminism is for Everybody, writes to persuade the reader to her own cause: feminism. She uses rhetorical devices, which can be used to persuade—or dissuade—readers in comparison to the writer’s own point of view.
In the article “Don’t Blame the Eater” written by David Zinczenko he argues that children suing the fast food industries may not be entirely wrong for doing so. He goes on to advocate that fast food companies neglect to fully inform their consumers properly. Throughout his arguments, he uses the different forms of rhetorical analysis to emphasize his point. These persuasion techniques allow us as the reader to see the article with further clarity. One of the persuasion techniques he uses is logos (logic), this is the act of stating facts, evidence, and reasons. The next persuasion technique is ethos (credibility), he briefly educates us on his current occupation which allows us to trust his words. Lastly, Zinczenko uses pathos (emotion), he appeals to our emotions and feelings by giving
Any speech tries to persuade the audience to accomplish the goal of the speaker. There are multiple modes of persuasion. These modes include Logos and Pathos. Logos is the actual evidence and argument whereas pathos is the speakers appeal to the audience’s emotions. In Mary Fisher’s 1992 Republican National Convention Address also known as “A Whisper of AIDS” Fisher speaks to America about the seriousness of HIV and AIDS. Fisher uses both logos and pathos to appeal to the audience. She urges America to take action by using evidence and experiences to promote emotions and certain attitudes to her audience.
speaker, audience. In their writing (chapter 1) argue that everything can be turned into an argument. They support their claim by first telling about Michelle Obama's tweets about her concern of a kidnapping, by terrorist group Boko Haram, of more than 200 Nigerian girls in 2014. Then by explaining how we make arguments. The author’s purpose is to inform readers about make arguments by using ethos, pathos, and logos.
The emotional state of any given person’s mind can determine the way in which they think, act, behave, or respond to any certain event. When used correctly, persuasion is a deadly weapon at the tip of your tongue, and it certainly can, and will, help you obtain your desired outcome. So, if anyone may not know, what do you truthfully use to manipulate the thoughts of others? Well, whether you are aware or not, your strategies more than likely fall under ethos, pathos, or logos, that of which, I would like to uncover in the speech of Margaret Sanger.
In the book Thank You for Arguing, the author, Jay Heinrichs presents the reader with the fundamental tools to master the art of persuasion. Heinrichs applies current events and topics to the book to grab the reader’s attention and spark their interest in the wonderful world of persuasion. The ultimate goal by the end of the book is the ability to apply the tools and techniques mentioned throughout the book into your arguments, hopefully resulting in success. I know that reading this book has equipped me with the knowledge and tools to shape my arguments correctly, and strategically in my favor. Hopefully this paragraph is a reflection of that. Now think back to your high school experience, do you recall the heart wrenching moment when you
King’s argument is very convincing because of his uses of personal evidence, figurative language, and tone. Ultimately, one can choose to believe his theory or not. To what extent can this article fall too? Who can read this article and learn from it? King’s argument demonstrates unique techniques, non-traditional methods of convincing such as not using statistics nor graph to convince someone.
The purpose of this assignment is to apply the knowledge and key terms that I have learned throughout the course of this semester as they relate to argumentation. I will use this assignment to analyze different arguments that have been made in the “real world.” The argument text(s) that I have chosen are 3 different commercials from “Top 10 Super Bowl Ads.” I have chosen the Dove ad, the Geico ad, and the Victoria Secret ad to complete my analysis. I chose these three particular ads because they will allow me to use several of the concepts that I have learned in class to analyze them. The videos also make it easier to visualize and understand the arguments each ad makes, rather than having to read a text and trying to make out what the
After viewing the PowerPoint, reading the article and watching the video. I found that there are only three ways to persuade the audience. Athos is one the first key component in which the writer convinces the reader by its character. The writer must be knowledgeable and have respect on the different point of views of the subject. Secondly, we have Pathos in where the writer use emotions and beliefs to persuade the audience. Emotions and beliefs are often used to express the writer how they feel towards the claim. Finally, we have Lagos in which we use reasoning and logic to make a claim. This is where evidences and reasons plays important part to show the audience that our claim is reasonable.
The first appeal that will be analyzed is logos, the appeal to logic. In Malala’s speech, the constant use of many statistics and facts made the speech much more reasonable and sensible. For example: “And that is why they killed 14 innocent medical students in the recent attack in Quetta”. Also, “Thousands of people have been killed by the terrorists and millions have been injured.” These quotes establish logic in the sense that if one uses statistics or facts, it shows that they’ve done their research and they are aware of the issues happening globally. In the Sealand Lady’s speech, the use of reasoning and common sense is evidently shown through quotes like “It is not pleasant to kill any creature, she agreed, ‘but to pretend that one can live without doing so is self deception” and “The essential quality of life is living; the essential quality of living is change; change is evolution: and we are a part of it.” These quotes show that death is inevitable for life to form and although it’s not pleasant, it still has to happen. In addition, whoever is an enemy of change is essentially an enemy of life because the two fit hand-in-hand. To conclude, the use of logos in Malala’s speech and the Sealand lady’s speech was effective.