Introduction
The biggest challenge facing any business today is change. Ricardo Semlars approach to management revolutionized they way in which Secom did business. However it is of question if Semlars model of business can be successfully transplanted into New Zealand’s business environment and change the way in which they operate. This essay will therefore discuss if Ricardo’s unique approach to business, and how it can be successfully used in the New Zealand business environment.
This essay will firstly discuss the idea that profit sharing can motivate workers and how this idea is set up in the New Zealand business environment. Secondly the ways in which employee participation work in New Zealand, and how managers can better
…show more content…
Another way of looking at this idea is that if an employee can directly relate to the success of the company, with the amount of profits they will receive, employees would join with management to improve the business profitability and productivity. Bell and Hanson (1987) also believe that by implementing a profit sharing scheme into a business, employees will have a greater sense of identity with the company and have a greater share in the company’s success. One example of successful implementation of this idea in New Zealand is Mac Pac. Mac Pac is one of New Zealand leading outdoor equipment providers. After 5 years of running the business, CEO Bruce McIntyre has implemented a profit sharing scheme into the business where Macpac distribute 20% of pre-tax profits to staff each year. Other business in New Zealand has followed this business model such as the CEO of GMV Associates New Zealand, who believes that “There are huge advantages in profit share because the staff becomes totally committed to the company” (Clark-Reynolds cited in Light, 1997, p.34). What this leads to is a decrease in employee turnover and increase productivity of workers, because they now have a greater interest in the company’s success. This translates into a more successful company.
However New Zealand businesses wishing to implement profit sharing schemes should not just look at shop floor workers buy managers as well. Currently in
Ricardo has implemented a lot of changes regarding management style, strategies, and policies. The company that was thought to have executed a poor management style has been a champion of change with profits increasing rapidly and steadily. Semco has enjoyed an assorted increase in profitability, productivity and development, which is incredible bearing in mind the many years of economic and political instability it has been operating in (Vanderburg, 2004). This precise paper is meant to examine the management style of Semco company, particularly the company's democracy, fundamental values, sharing of profits and sharing of information.
All employees analyze their environment and strive to be recognized and rewarded for their hard work and dedication they put into the company, in a word they are seeking justice. Justice can be defined as a person receiving what they feel they are entitled to and if they do not receive what they deserve, the situation may boarder on injustice. Unfortunately in today’s society justice and appreciation are not given out to all those deserving (Pinder, 1998). Within the Equity theory there are three justice theories. The first of which is distributive justice, this touches on if the referent feels that the outputs are fair that are given to the employees. This comes into play
management in the business world. How to rethink the old rules of business are presented
A well-articulated compensation philosophy drives organizational success by aligning pay and other rewards with business strategy. It provides the foundation for plan design and administration and anchors current and future plans to the company's culture and values (Kaplan, 2006, p.32). Recognizing and rewarding achievement is the cornerstone of the company A’s compensation philosophy. The mission of the company is to attract, select, place and promote all individuals based on their qualifications. The company believes that performance-based compensation helps attract, develop and retain talented professionals. In addition to base pay which based upon local market conditions and targeted to be above market, the company provides the following types of potential compensation to reward performance:
Pay and Rewards – pay and rewards attract, motivate and retain staff. The employment contract which lists rewards, whether it be pay, bonus or benefits, can remove animosity amongst employees and employers. However, recent research reveals that employees are no longer motivated by a financial reward alone, but
In what ways are management of companies different or how are they similar to one another? And what is the importance of management in how a company runs nowadays? Many of us question about why knowing the history of management is important to Managers? According to (Samson et al, 2012, Page 53) “A historical perspective provides a broader way of thinking; a way of searching for patterns and determining whether they recur across time periods.” In the history of management, many trends have appeared. Many argue that the new techniques being introduced may not have a permanent solution. Others think that managers adapting to new techniques for continuous improvement in this ever changing world. It is important to know the background of how these management perspectives evolved and who and how is it being used now.
Some employees rely on the extra income every couple of months to help with expenses, but because of the high taxes attached to the income depending on what the actual amount would be may not be worth it at all. The purpose of most profit plans provides more financial flexibility to the company. Profit sharing plans may fail to motivate employees because they do not see a direct link between their efforts and corporate profits. Hourly employees may have trouble seeing the connection because their efforts appear to be several steps removed from the company’s performance, and because company profits vary from year to year, employees’ receive their earnings based off company profits. Employees will find it difficult to predict their earnings, which will affect their saving and buying behavior. (Martocchio, pg. 97, 2011)
Pivotal in that philosophy development is how and to what extent pay will be tied to specific types of performance. This issue will not be treated the same in every organization. However, every business should be able to identify certain performance objectives it wants its workforce to fulfill and the financial outcome that will be achieved if that result is attained. Such a projection can be translated into an increased shareholder value figure. (The VisionLink Advisory Group)
Most important, the employees can earn stock, which gives them voice within the company to make pertinent decisions.
Reward Management (RM) has been defined as the distribution of monetary and non-monetary rewards to employees in an effort to align the interests of the employees, the organisation, and its shareholders (O’Neil, 1998). In addition O’Neil (1998) also suggests that a RM system can serve the purpose of attracting prospective job applicants, retaining valuable employees, motivating employees, ensuring legal requirements relating to direct and indirect rewards are not violated, assisting the company in achieving human resource and business objectives, and ultimately assisting the organisation in obtaining a competitive advantage.
“While Mangers complain about lack of motivation in their workers, they might as well consider the possibility that the reward systems they’ve installed are paying off for the opposite”.
There are very many factors that motivate employees to do outstanding work in their jobs. Though most of them are non-monetary factors like participative decision making, work teams, challenging jobs, goals in life or in the company, power and other factors. Most of the employees that emerge in their workplace, either in a small cubicle or a mega office have got some drive that enable them to perform in their work, but the key question is, is money is the key motivation in their workplace? In this essay both sides will be argued in order to find the answer to this (Robbins, Odendaal & Roodt, 2003).
Biculturalism has a massive role in Aoteaora New Zealand’s society and has a massive impact in its history. Having a clear understanding of it is crucial in order to be more appreciative of how diverse New Zealand’s society has become, and it also helps us discern the negative aspects of diversity and multiculturalism. By examining and understanding biculturalism, it helps us discern the Treaty of Waitangi’s role and influences in the human services provision here in New Zealand.
Describe Ricardo Semler 's leadership style. What do you think the advantages and drawbacks of his style might be?
Both the bussiness and emplyees want to ensure that they are getting what they deserve after putting in thier resources. This where Taylors “equal pay for a hard days work” becomes essential. According to PwCs global milleneal survey, majority of millineals agreed they were getting paid leses than they deserved.Being that milleneals make the majority of the current workforce, this should be a major concern for bussinesses.When workers know they are getting paid more when they work more, they are motivated to work harder and efficiently. Also it is a good example to new entrants to work hard for a better standard of living. It is common for companies that adoptthe human Resources model tend to spend a considerable amounts to ensure employee comfort.Google for example provides employees with an array of recreational activities and food options. However, the less people are paid, the less they are concerned with the incentives thier employers are providing. Futhermore, the time demanding tasks at a company like google will not allow an employee to take an hour or two off to use the gym or get a