1. Are you for or against state right-to-work laws? I am firmly opposed to the right-to-work legislation because these laws are designed to reduce the economic and political power of unions by forcing unions to represent non-dues paying members equally with dues paying members. Lawmakers on both sides of the issue make strong but not necessarily equal arguments for and against the right to work laws. During a contentious and unsuccessful union-led recall campaign of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker over collective bargaining rights, two of the strongest arguments made by right-leaning supporters was that right to work laws spur income growth and higher pay. While there may be a modicum of truth to those arguments, the fact of the matter …show more content…
When businesses pay workers less, the organization becomes more profitable and thereby more competitive against companies where right-to-work laws have not been enacted. Companies like Boing freely admit that moving operations to right-to-work states save money on employee wages and other benefits. According to Isidore (2017), “The union says South Carolina workers earn about $10 an hour less than union members at Boeing's Washington state plants” (para …show more content…
One of the main responsibilities of the governor of any state is to expand the tax base so its citizens can enjoy more services derived from tax revenue. Governors from across this country are actively engaged in their attempts to entice major manufacturing companies to relocate to their states. Texas is one of 25 right-to-work states (Right to Work Laws, 2017, para 5) and in 2012, Governor Rick Perry launched an aggressive campaign to lure new business using deep business tax cuts and deregulation as bait (Story, 2012). The tactic worked; Texas was ranked 6th in job creation (Abrahams, 2013), however, according to Story, (2012) “Along with the huge job growth, the state has the third-highest proportion of hourly jobs paying at or below minimum wage” (para 6). Clearly, right-to-work laws add value for the state by bringing in new businesses but at a steep cost in terms of employee wages and other
The labor relations movement has been one of the most successful driving forces behind such efforts as: providing aid to workers who were injured or retired, better health benefits and to stop the practice of child labor in the workforce. Ostensibly, unions in the United States arose out of the need to better protect the “common interests” of laborers. Today, many of the social movements and alliances forged are created under the guise to better protect the employer from a plethora of interests made against the organization, rather than, increasing wages, improving reasonable employment hours and/or enhancing work conditions.
See, e.g., Marion Crain & Ken Matheny, Beyond Unions, Notwithstanding Labor Law, 4 U.C. IRVINE L. REV. 561, 562–53 (2014). “Unions served as a vehicle for worker voice and political influence . . . .”
A strong, independent and thriving Texas economy is a top priority of Gov. Perry’s. His efforts to provide a reasonable legal climate, a sensible regulatory environment and inducements for job growth and business development have made for a more prosperous state. This focus on tax and regulatory reform, increasing trade, forming industry clusters, and investing for growth has strengthened our state’s economy to weather the forces of our nation’s recent economic struggles.
Texas does outperform other states in terms of economic growth and population growth. Many people move to Texas because of the jobs and they do taxes right. (Batheja, 2013) Gov. Rick Perry believes Texas’s performance through the recession is due to lack of income tax. He says “You can stop trying to figure out how to pay the state income tax, because we don’t have one.” (Batheja, 2013) The Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning research group, ranks Texas ninth-best on its State Business Tax Climate Index, largely because of the state’s lack of an income tax. (Batheja, 2013) On the other hand, Texas’s high property taxes remains a crucial complaint among business and homeowners. It’s harder for small business to pay their taxes especially if their business wasn’t very profitable. Small business end up using their own personal savings, mortgages, or borrow money in order to pay their taxes. Having a state tax would benefit small business. Although having no state tax is accepted by many, it puts a dent on cities and towns. Local debt has increased over the past decade, in large part to cover the costs for new schools and public maintenance projects. (Batheja, 2013) The state is pushing projects such as building of highways and roads to cities and counties. (Batheja, 2013) In 2012, more than 500 lawsuits were from school districts arguing that our public education isn’t properly
In states without state income tax, higher sales, property and other assorted taxes can exceed the annual cost of a state income tax. Texas is one of seven states that do not levy an individual income tax. The Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning research group, ranks Texas ninth-best on its State Business Tax Climate Index, largely because of the state’s lack of an income tax. On three of the foundation’s other major rankings — property taxes, sales taxes and corporate taxes — Texas ranks in the bottom 20 states. Texas does not have a statewide property tax, but local property taxes remain a crucial complaint among businesses and homeowners. (Terrence, 2002) The main benefit is that states with no income tax become a beacon for growth. They 're better at creating jobs and keeping a core of young, educated workers from moving to other states. The issue is undoubtedly controversial. Public opinion usually swings with the size of one 's paycheck and the role people think governments should play in shaping society. Texas has an above-average sales taxes, and Texas also has higher-than-average effective property tax rates. Cutting the income tax will boost take-home pay for everyone. It 'll make the state more attractive than its neighbors, creating jobs, drawing new businesses, and sparking an influx of talented workers.
The past of Unions is indisputable; however, the outlook can be altered to form a promising future. The reversal of history can be done through reconstruction and restatement of workers rights. A reestablishment of worker liberties should be considered in order to clarify any confusion in which present and prospective employees are faced with. Unions are notorious for being tyrannical and inconsiderate towards employees and thus union heads should confront this issue head on and give workers a voice (i.e. vote). In order to regain union strength in today’s society I believe Unions must give workers honorable rights and a democratic right to be heard.
There is no doubt that Texas’s state government is one of the most conservative in the nation on both an economic and social level. As a governing body Texas has fought to deregulate itself on the bases that a weak government translates to strong personal liberties. The political culture of the state is apparent to all who live there. However, in recent history Texas has proven to be a solid competitor when offering tax rebates to filmmakers and videogame creators who produce their content in the state. These rebates refund some of the production costs and are widely considered to be beneficial to employment within the state’s entertainment and tourism industry (Weed). Sadly, in 2015 Texas lawmakers cut the previously impressive budget for
First, due to increased employment Texas has one of the fastest and largest growing economies in the United States. From June 2011 to June 2013, “Texas lost 433,000 jobs and gained all the lost jobs back” (Canas and Phillips 3). During the past two years, “ professional and business
Texas has 4.4 percent unemployment rates, it’s still pretty high compare to New Hampshire and South Dakota. New Hampshire ana South Dakota has a high economic in agricultural and has low state taxes, this helps their unemployment rate stay low. Unemployment came from closing down business, new technology replace human work, and hired cheap labor from other countries. This may cause people to lost their job, unable to meet their financial, and lead to decline standard living. I believe that if Texas would open more companies that produce our own products and lower the state taxes. This ways will help the unemployment rate in Texas to go down and not many people would have to suffer to find a job of their
We the Republican Party support the American workforce knowing that the future of the country rests on a strong economy. To insure economic prosperity it is imperative that states have the freedom to act accordingly to its economy. We as Americans, as workers, and as taxpayers should seek to quiet the anxiety over labor and wages. We cannot be held to a standard that blankets the whole nation when it is evident that each state is different. States must be allowed to evaluate the conditions of their economy, unemployment, growth and other relative demographics and then should have the ability to set the minimum wage.
Montana is not currently a right-to-work state. If it were to become one, there are benefits and negative aspects. One pro to being a right-to-work state is the fundamental right. Those in favor of the laws being put in place feel like their right to work is a essential right in the constitution. Before the laws were set, workers were being forced to join a union which can be seen as a defilement of their privileges. Another benefit that can come from the right to work laws being set in the competitiveness. The laws can lead to an increase in competitiveness when it comes to the wages. Right to work laws have also been proven to increase the percentage of workers that are employed compared to the states that do not have right to work laws in
The labor union movement over the years has shaped the way individuals work and live for both the nicest and unpleasant. Some would think the unions influence has created a power struggle between management and union leaders. In today’s time, some citizens insist the existence of unions are a must to aid in employee freedom, while others view the labor unions as just another problem in the line of progress. The purpose of labor unions was for employed workers to come together and collectively agree on fundamental workplace objectives. The rise of the union came about after the Civil War- responding to the industrial economy. Surprisingly at the least unions became popular within the 1930-50’s and began to slowly decrease,
In conclusion, I have found that I both agree and disagree with labor unions. I think they can be very beneficial but also very limiting. I think that the right to work movement is a great opportunity for a lot of workers and businesses to be able to escape some of the cons of unions. Labor unions can be tough but they can be helpful, because of them people can more easily speak out about issues as a group rather than individually, but because of some issues in each union, the right to work movement was created as a
Another thing that greatly influenced my point of view would be my religion. I strongly believe in helping others and standing up for what you believe in. Because of this I do greatly support unions. They were essential in our past and fought for the rights we have today. While there are not as many big issues to fight for today I still believe that people should be allowed to unite and meet with their employers to discuss certain issues without the fear of becoming unemployed. The fact of the matter is that big businesses can often place profit over people and we have to be able to confront them about this. I feel that the government has allowed businesses to have too much power and they need to play a great role in the well being of it’s people. Maybe there
When we hear about “Right to Work” you immediately think that it means everyone has the right to work, part of that statement is true, however it doesn’t mean that. “"Right to work" is the commonly used term for laws that make it illegal to require that employees join a union or pay the equivalent of union dues to get or keep a job. Under such laws, employees can still form unions, engage in collective bargaining and go on strike”(Pearson, 2017). Florida in 1943 passed the first “Right to Work” law and soon after many other states follow suit. It was introduced because unions were becoming very powerful back in the 1940’s and the sate thought they never to step in to make sure its residents were being treated fairly. However, if you are in the railroad industry or the airline industry you are not protected by “Right to Work”. Since its inception the law has been on the national level since