Why Rome Had a Better Citizenship System than Athens Citizenship is a status given by a government to some or all of its people. Rome and Athens had notably different views when it came to their policies on this concept. Due to these separate opinions, Rome and Athens each developed a unique system of citizenship, one focused on citizen responsibility, and the other on individual rights. In Athens, citizens prioritized responsibilities such as voting, participating in political debate, and holding office. In contrast, Romans were judged by how he interacted with his family, his neighbors, and his property. Although comparing Athens and Rome is difficult because of the drastic size difference, it is clear to see that Rome had an advantage over
In Athens and Rome, citizenship was to be honored and protected. There were many requirements to become a citizen, so not everyone could have it. The Roman Republic allowed free men, women, and children to have citizenship, but the Athens only gave citizenship to free, native-born adult males. Although it might seem like the citizenship system was better in Rome, the system in Athens was better because citizens were given equal rights, Athenians ostracized citizens so there is no dictator, and every citizen could become officials.
Athens and Rome were two powerful civilizations. Their impact still influence us today. About 500 BC, people were no longer considered subjects. They are now called citizens, and had to meet certain responsibilities. If you meet the requirements then you could be granted citizenship. Only certain people could be granted citizenship, and it was to be honored and protected. Athens had a better system then Rome, because the Athenians where more cautious and gave people equal chances for obtaining citizenship. They also did ostracism, and believed in The Old Oligarch.
The reason Rome is better than Athens is because they were superior to their enemies. The Roman Republic was in the Italian peninsula in 509 to 27 BCE. Rome was better than was better than Athens is because they were more uniform in their systems and rules and laws. They both had their Downpoints and their Strengths but Rome still came out stronger.Rome was able to thrive as a more advanced system than Athens because they had a more organized voting system, allowed for equitable rights, and had allowed citizen to actively participation the government.
The first reason why Rome’s citizenship system was better than Athens’ is because they accepted more people as citizens. In document A it shows who could be allowed to become a citizen in both Athens and Rome. Rome allowed all people except slaves to become citizens while Athens only allowed free native born adult males to become citizens. Rome was a lot more lenient when giving citizenship which is probably one reason they boasted a population of 45,000,000.
In Document A created by various sources there is chart that explains how to get a citizenship in Rome and Athens. The chart shows that Romans gave away citizenship more than Athens, and they had more regulations. The only people who could not obtain a citizenship in Rome were slaves and freed slaves. Whereas in Athens the only one on the chart to obtain citizenship without work or training was a, free native-born adult male, and in order to get that his parents had to be free born Athenians. Although free native-born male children could obtain citizenship they had to get a education and have 2 years of military training. The facts on the chart show that in Rome everyone, except freed slaves and slaves, mattered to a certain extinct.The extinct
When you think of the first governments you think of Athens and Rome, but which one was a better system? Athens and Rome were both great governments because they both elected officials. Well which was a better system Athens or Rome? Rome was a better system thn Athens because they were more organized, they were more freely given to citizenship, and they had less people in their council.
Rome had a better system of citizenship due to these three reasons: they gave up citizenship more freely, they had censors that judged people, and they had a smaller Senate making it easier to agree on one idea. One reason that the system of citizenship was better in Rome was that they gave up citizenship more freely than Athens did. The evidence that shows this is in Document A when it says that they let free, native-born, adult males, free, native-born, adult females, free, native-born, male children, female children, and sons of freed slaves. Athens only let free, native-born adult males be citizens. This evidence helps explain why Rome had the stronger system because it shows how they let all types of people, not
Women in the U.S. weren't allowed to vote until about 60 years ago, but in ancient time they became citizens all the way back in about 500 B.C.E. In ancient Rome was located in Italy and was from 743 BCE to 64 AD, and Athens was located in Greece and was from 500 BCE to 79 AD. Did Athens or Rome have a better citizenship system. Rome had a better system of citizenship for these reasons the Roman Senate cared for foreigners, had 300 men in the Senate, and served for life.
By around 500 BC, the new idea of citizenship began to take shape. The people of an empire were no longer referred to as subjects, but as citizens. These people were given certain rights, but along with these rights came responsibilities as well. Although both the Romans and Athenians had citizens, they had different outlooks on what an individual’s right and responsibilities were. Athens’ system for citizenship was better than that of Rome’s because all citizens were given equal right, their government was built by the poor, they protected their democracy.
Everyone knows and loves ancient Rome for its military, architecture and culture, but not many people care about how it affects society today. For example, people may know that ______ was created during Ancient Rome, but they don’t know that it's the reason that ______________ exists today. (Finish this) Rome was a great empire that lasted for a long time, and while it was a thing it was a very prosperous time which many innovations and ideas were created. It began in the 753 BC, and fell in 476 AD, that means it lasted for about 1,300 years (12,13).
The romans sometimes gave away citizenship rights in measured amounts was because of Emperor Claudius. According to Citizens of Athens or Rome it states, “ In other words, the Athenians were more stingy with their citizenship. The Romans more freely gave it away.” Because the Romans were more freely about the citizenship the citizens got far amounts of rights. If the Athenians were anything actually involved with giving citizens free rights they wouldn’t of been far to the citizens. For an example, “ People from regions outside of Rome but on the Italian
What did it feel like to be in Ancient Rome? How did the Romans live? Ancient Rome was located on central Italy's Tiber River into an empire that at its peak encompassed most of continental Europe, Britain, much of western Asia, northern Africa and the Mediterranean islands. Most of the Romans’ lifestyle were Jobs, Armies, War, Food and Religion.
Slide 1: My project is on Ancient Civilizations in Italy. My presentation will focus on Italy during the Roman Empire, the Reformation, and the Renaissance.
In the beginning of the sixth century BCE the idea of people participating in a role of society started to develop and later evolved into the status of people given by their government; citizenship. With citizenship came the theory of social contract, which stated that if a citizen does their part for their nation their nation shall do theirs. As the theory evolved the Roman republic focused more on how their people interacted with the other citizens and participated in their government rather than the citizen’s responsibility which was the main emphasis in the city-state of Athens. Athens had stricter guidelines to become a citizen, but allowed more freedom when they have received the title of being a citizen, unlike the Romans, which constricted their citizens based on their initial background and/or gender (Citizenship in Athens and Rome Background Essay). The Athenian city-state had an overall superior citizenship organization than the Romans because there citizens had the ability to have an input, no matter their assets, various were accepted as
The definition of citizenship in Greek and Roman cultures can be described much differently than the current democratic definition of contemporary nations. The Roman Empire differed from the Athenian Amphictyony and the Assyrian Empire as well as the sunder later emperors such as Vespasian. There were also structural problems within the government of the Roman Empire. This paper will explore the models of government and citizenship that Ancient Roman and Greek peoples employed along with how well they worked.