preview

SPED: The Role Of Minority Groups In Education

Better Essays

Demographic and economic factors can also be used as predictors for minority groups in SPED. Since many minority groups often struggle economically and thus live in poverty, much of the time these groups of students also live demographically close to one another, often out of circumstance and for support. In connection to this, often comes the fact that often, because of their social standing, minority groups are not given the same chances to receive the highest academic opportunities available to the public, thus setting them up for pre-determined failure and misplacement in different areas of education they may not belong. Additionally, on page 193, Hosp and Reschly (2004), state that different SPED distinctions, rather that be ED, MR, or …show more content…

The most basic and the most important influence schools can have is hiring highly qualified, competent, and informed teachers; teachers that can look past preconceived notions and biases and are able to make informed judgments on students. In addition to this, the teachers should also be educated in matters of how to properly handle and teach struggling students, or at the very least attempt to, before they make the decision to refer to special education. Teachers are in fact, often the first stage in the SPED placement process, because they are often the ones making the initial recommendation. On page 53 Harry & Klingner (2014), describe the impact teacher-student relationships have on the overall wellbeing of the student and the outcome of their academic success. When the relationship is positive, there is affection, smiles, and laughter; when the relationship turns sour, there is anger, sadness, and hostility. As long as the relationship between teacher and student is a success, the relationship with the parents will generally be a success as well; resulting in better achievement for the student and will often eliminate any bias …show more content…

The impact of high-stakes testing on special education referrals was one more example of the machine bureaucracy at work. In this case, the extreme sorting process mandated by the NCLB act worked against the best interests of children whose achievement was toward the weak end of the learning continuum. The drive to find “our special education children who have not been placed” resulted in appropriate interventions for some and very inappropriate interventions and placement for others (Harry & Klingner, 2014, p. 120).
Testing, of any kind, should not be the only or even the most predominately used factor when determine special education placement. A struggling and low-performing student does not equal a student that should be placed in special education. Often, a child only needs scaffolding and differentiated instruction techniques put in place by the general education teacher, in addition to cultural responsiveness, to

Get Access