SSG Stoutenburg Case

On 11/6/2017 at 1400 hours, I Officer Graves, responded to 735 E Haggard Ave Elon, NC 27244 in reference to an assist. Upon arrival Detective Turney, Lieutenant Sweat, and Officer Peters were at apartment K executing a search warrant. I was requested to remain outside of the residence at the front door. At 1426 hours Captain B. Tillotson entered the residence and left at 1441 hours. At hours Officer Peters released Jacy Loshin from the premises after issuing a citation. At 1455 hours Officer Chavis entered the residence and remained until the search warrant execution was completed at 1530 hours, when all remaining officers cleared.

As the day-shift supervisor at the ISG Steelton steel plant, you summon the six college students who are working for you this summer, doing whatever you need done (sweeping up, sandblasting the inside of boilers that are down for maintenance, running errands, and so forth). You walk them across the plant to a field where the company stores scrap metal. The area, about the size of a football field, is stacked with organized piles of metal. You explain that everything they see has just been sold. Metal prices, which have been depressed, have finally risen enough that the company can earn a small profit by selling its scrap.

While doing a High Visibility Deterrant in lot #25, we were requested to assist WPD at 1712 hours by WPD Scat 248D Jared M Henry #2271. WSU Officer Dickerson #155 contacted WSU Sergeant Brad Agnew #153 by radio to confirm if he heard WPD's request for WSU officer. WSU Sergeant Brad Agnew #153 confirmed and told Officer Dickerson and I to switch over. Officer Dickerson confirmed WSU Sergeant Brad Agnew's traffic and radioed WSU dispatch to inform we would be switching to the WPD North channel. WSU Sergeant Brad Agnew #153 then informed us to not get involved and to switch our radioes to the Letac 10 channel and we did so. Officer Dickerson #155 then informed Letac 10 dispatch that we (WSU 202) would be assisting.

When a law enforcement officer or other public employee is accused of potentially criminal conduct, they may face three different kinds of interviews or interrogations. If an officer is interviewed as a criminal suspect, they have the absolute right to decline to answer any questions, or to insist that they have a lawyer of their choosing to attend the interview. The first is type is during a criminal investigation; the second is during a disciplinary investigation and finally during the course of civil litigation where there has been damages. During a criminal interview, there is no professional, ethical or moral duty to participate especially without the assistance of an attorney to represent the officer under investigation. It has come to a surprise that many experienced officers will waive their right to silence and give the investigators an audio recorded statement. Some of the inexperienced criminals do not make incriminating statements. The motive for cooperation is to avoid unfavorable publicity.

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at about 2157 hours while present at group 31, I received the audio interview of PO Albert Robles conducted by Capt. Daniel Mahony, Sgt. Russo & Sgt. Deonarinesingh, Queens South investigation. PO Healy 102nd Precinct PBA delegate was also present. PO Robles stated the following;

Tharp. Murphy stated that he had met up with Zima and Caston at John Staples

On Friday morning, July 11, 2015, at about 12:15 AM, I was driving a marked squad and driving on the Wiouwash Trail. The campus area of the trail has a posted closing hour of 11 PM. I saw 2 males near the boat landing southwest of the Student Recreation and Wellness Center (SRWC) and start to walk away when I shined the squad spot light on them. I then saw 4 other individuals walking away from my position. I radioed to dispatch that I would be out with the group of 6 individuals and exited my squad.

On August 11, 2017 Police Officer Lawrence Lezewski, DSN 11428 manning vehicle 2426 and I (Probationary Police Officer James Harris III, DSN 0513) manning vehicle 2425 received a radio call for an “Assault” at North Broadway and Salisbury Street on a Bi-State Bus. Upon our arrival, we were met by victim Eddie Dickens and witness Willie Penson (Bi-State Bus Driver), who stated the following:

P alleges false arrest. P alleges he was walking outside his apartment with a friend when MOS approached him and arrested him on drug charges. P alleges he was transported to PSA 1 where he was strip-searched. No other information is known about both incidents. It is unclear what role, if any, MOS Diana Pichardo, played in both

Finally, PMO recommends management discuss this report with CPAC MER regarding Mr Jennings outbursts to determine what formal discipline action is appropriate and discuss reporting inappropriate behavior sooner. At this time, criminal charges have not been

(6) Due to the lack of substantiating evidence or corroborating witness testimony, I am unable to conclude that CPT Jorgensen committed the act of lying to a superior Officer. It is the opinion of this investigator that the situation was more a result of miscommunication and lack of details at the time of the calls, coupled with CPT Jorgensen’s hung over and exhausted state, than that of an intentional

This statement is intended to clarify and/ or elaborate on certain aspects of this investigation which may or may not be covered elsewhere by any other statement and/ or documents. At 1600 hours on 13 Dec 2016 SSG Bridgman conducted an interview and took a sworn statement from Mrs. Hodges who described an incident that occurred at 0700 hours on 09 Dec 2016 at VIP Apartments, in Pyoengteak, SK. She was leaving her apartment with her 9 month old Son who was an occupant in her car she stated when driving around at slow rate of speed to be mindful for children waiting for the bus. She had begun to slowly travel around the children at the stop in the oncoming lane. She noticed that a tall, white man, mostly balding in a P.T. Uniform was approaching

Thirdly, an applicant seeking judicial review would struggle to collect the evidence necessary to demonstrate that a jurisdictional error has been made. In 1982, the High Court stated that an applicant ‘would face immense practical difficulties in building a case against such a secretive organisation [as ASIO]’.73 These difficulties are exacerbated by provisions of the ASIO Act, including the Secrecy Provisions, which prohibit publication of an ASIO officer’s identity, and restrictions on lawyers’ ability to access information about the warrants to which their

Rather than meet with Keith Chiefmoon on the reserve I requested he attend the Lethbridge Police Service to provide a statement. Keith Chiefmoon arrived at the police service the following day dressed in regular street cloths, blue jeans, dress shirt, jacket and his grey hair in braids. Keith Chiefmoon was in his late 60’s. I introduced myself and told Mr. Chiefmoon advising him I would be investigating his complaint and needed to clarify

From my understanding, shared responsibility gives organizations that contribute to their own financial situation priority when considering funding. I think this policy is great and incentivizes organizations to fundraise. However, I believe there a few variables that change from organization to organization that could present potential flaws with this policy. This is why I am eager to learn more about the policy and hopefully have some of my questions answered. For example, organizations with more members will be able to fundraise more than an organization with a lesser amount of members. Does the larger organization get priority for funding just because they are relatively larger