The argument of same-sex marriage is an important one. The question of legalization of same sex marriages is an issue in many of our states today. I would like to argue that same-sex marriages do not infringe on any civil rights, but it is also immoral. We, as Christians, should not be afraid to stand up and use our Constitutional rights to speak against same-sex marriages.
The debate over whether same-sex marriage should be legalized has focused on the infringement of civil rights. State recognition of marriages is not a common right. States control marriages in many ways, not just by denying same sex gender the right to marry. Approximately half of all states deny first cousins from marrying and all deny marriage of closer blood
…show more content…
Unions of same-sex partners should not involve children. There is no natural way that two women or two men can conceive and have children. Same-sex partners should not be given custody or the ability to adopt a child. Homosexual parents may not cause a child to become a gay or lesbian, but it does deprive the child of a mother (female) and father (male). Children long to bond emotionally with their parents, especially the parent of their own gender. The relationship is a fundamental part in the process of growing to feel complete as males and females. If same-sex marriages are legalized and homosexuals are allowed to adopt or is granted custody of children, no matter what we as Christians believe, public schools will be required to teach that homosexual relations are considered to be as equal to heterosexual relationships are. Today, we as parents are being challenged enough already with what are children are taught in school and society. If you think not, may I remind you that our children can be given birth control without our knowledge. If same-sex marriages are made legal, they will be teaching our children that homosexuality is just as natural as heterosexuality. The argument over same-sex marriages is not only about tolerance, but of preference of the option of a lifestyle. Gays have no right to demand that we as Christians, or
In recent years, the debate over same-sex marriage has grown into a nationwide controversy, reverberating into the halls of congress, at the white house, in dozens of state and legislature and courtrooms, and in the rhetoric of election campaigns at both the national and state levels. As the debate rages on, the American religious community remains deeply divided over the issue, and over the morality of homosexuality. The debate has grown from an issue that occasionally arose in a few states to a national and even worldwide controversy.
In a very real sense, it is reasonable to argue that the government should have no say at all in the processes of marriage, or decide which adults may or may not legally marry. State and federal governments play a role, of course, in that marriage is a civil union, and provides benefits and legal protections for the couple. Historically, marriage serves the interests of the society by promoting stability and future generations of citizens, and governments usually act in ways to promote this very vital element. At the same time, it is highly questionable whether this governmental authority should have any voice in who chooses to marry, provided those involved are adults and wish to do so. This is in fact, at the heart of the same-sex
Marriage is universally understood to be the legal union between a man and a woman. This acknowledgement, however, has recently generated dispute and controversy in certain individuals, primarily homosexuals and supporters of homosexual marriages. This opposition, due to this mainstream view, exists because certain states such as Minnesota deny same-sex marriages.
Lately there has been a great deal of discussion over legalising same sex marriage. To some people; there is no problem with it. However this is a controversial matter and there is still a great deal of debate ongoing in some countries, including this one, whether homosexual couples should continue to be denied the rights that straight couples enjoy. There is no reason why homosexuals relationships should be differentiated in any way from heterosexual ones. Homosexuality isn 't a choice. Any intolerance in our society concerning something someone cannot control, where no harm is caused, is not only ludicrous but also a form of discrimination. There is
To contravene God and the bible must be the incipient trend since homosexuals celebrate it and feel that is it ok to get espoused under God. Marriage is a sacred commitment between man and woman and the legalization of gay espousement threatens the Americans religious rights. This topic matters because Christians feel as if getting married under God is an act of dishonor and that it is irrelevant. Marriage should stay between a man and woman because that is verbalized in the bible, children are more likely to live a normal life, and religious beliefs are not being ignored.
Religious people argue that marriage is a religious right instead of a civil one. In their eyes allowing same sex couples to marry is a sacrilege, since the US was based on god and still is to some
Same-sex marriage should be protected. In Bill of Rights, there is First Amendment which permits freedom of Act. First Amendments promises every civil acts should have freedom in speech. The freedom of speech is the right to express any opinions without restriction. However, it is not absolute and there are qualifications for the rights to prevent abuse of law. The protected speech by First Amendment should not have obscenity, fighting words, perjury, solicitations to commit crimes. The speech which has these things cannot be protected by the First Amendment, and, it is the reason why homophobia’s speech should be censored. For example, the most typical argument what homophobia said in the past is that LGBTs are patients. Funnily enough, they argued not only their want for same-sex love and marriage is disease so LGBTs need mental treatment, but also they thought their same-sex love is a disease, which is contagious. So they wanted before they become gays or lesbian, they wanted to
The political issue of same-sex marriage has recently become one of the biggest debates of the 21st century. Its rise in popularity soared within the United States in 2000, when Vermont became the first state in the country to recognize these types of unions between same-sex couples. I believe that same-sex couples should not be denied of their right to marry, but there are several believable arguments, which contradict my opinion on the topic. These arguments include the beliefs that; allowing same-sex couples to wed will cause the institution of marriage to crumble, citizens of the United States should not have to pay taxes to support something which they believe to be wrong, and that the legalization of same-sex marriage could lead to
Legalizing gay marriage or the violation of the rights of gay individuals by the government of the United States is against the teachings of Christianity and something that Jesus Christ does not look upon. God is our savior and even though he supports quality and love thy neighbor. According to the bible and Christian teachings homosexuality is a sign and has nothing to do with loving thy neighbor. In the book of Genesis God created Adam and Eve to showcase to the world that this is how a married couple should look like. However individuals have taken that out of context and state that the couple wasn’t married they were just a heterosexual couple. God does not favor one sex over another and he intended on the two to both be treated equally. The issue here is thought yes God wanted both male and female to be treated equally but what about to of the same sex getting married being treated equally. Equality is very clearly stated in multiple verses of the Bible and this is the word and message that Jesus wants to show his people. That no one is better then the other we are all equal. You can find in the bible that all individuals regardless of their gender, social status, regional background and color to Jesus Christ are all equal (Kahn, 2011). One could look at it is that the American Government and Christianity don’t go hand in hand. Or that the American government goes against the teachings of Christianity, as they are not
The issue of whether a loving, same-sex Christian marriage can exist under complete Biblical authority has been one fraught with debate and controversy. This disagreement has notably increased in the past century, with the advent of homosexuality being recognized as an exclusive sexual orientation and the recent Supreme Court decision to recognize homosexual unions as marriage. In these times, more than ever, the church needs to have a concrete and truthful stance on this matter.
In today’s society homosexuality has become an ongoing topic that has now become a social issue worldwide. The real matter is that gay rights and religious freedom have been overthrown lately as each has been immorally misinterpreting the concept. As many of those that stay connected either through watching the news, reading the newspaper or scrolling through social media is well aware of the ongoing dispute between the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transsexual) community and the freedom of religion. Over the past few months the issue has reached a climax due to the approval of same sex marriage, and this has resulted in riots, protests, and immoral treatment. This nationwide decision has had such a negative impact on Christianity, which makes up the majority of the United States it is rather questionable when this societal matter will cease in order for a harmonious nation.
As we know, same-sex marriage has been discussed and argued for a long time. Within the controversial topic of gay rights, there’s no area more controversial than same-sex marriage. And all of us ask ourselves if same-sex marriage should be legal or not. But the fact is that we have to start thinking about it as a moral and religious topic. The government shouldn’t legalize the same-sex marriage because the
On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States declared all state-level bans against same-sex marriage unconstitutional, legalizing same-sex marriage all over the nation. While this ruling was a huge victory for the gay rights movement, it was not the end of the fight for equal gay rights. In fact, many gay people are still fighting for adoption rights, job safety, and government protections from abuse and segregation. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to find solutions for a significant social issue such as gay rights when both sides of the debate are in a stubborn gridlock. However, the conversation about that issue can be reinvigorated if people from opposing sides are exposed to fresh perspectives they had not considered before, paving the way for possible compromises. One way this can be achieved is with the help of a human belief system that is common to both sides of the social issue, such as Christianity. Because Christianity has millions of followers on both sides of the debate on homosexuality, it has a direct influence on many people’s views of homosexual individuals. Therefore, it can be used to reshape the currently intractable and conflicting discourse on gay rights in the United States in order to stimulate more productive discussion about homophobia and foster cooperation on both sides of the issue.
As a Christian same sex marriage is not a challenging subject to discuss from a biblical perspective. I accept as true what the bible said; that marriage is for a man and a woman and not anything else besides that. With that said, same sex marriage became an arduous topic to discuss once I put my Christian principles aside. For now I have to ignore what I believe and look at the situation from a third person, impartial view. I wanted to challenge myself on the issue of same sex marriage from a non-Christian point of view. The main saying used during a debate on same sex marriage is “the separation of church and state”. This phrase is a good piece of debate material. It is mainly used to ensure that the state is not governed by the church; that there will be a freedom of religion. One ethical standard may not be suitable for the entire population that makes up a nation. I come from a Christian background. I am a fervent believer in the true and living God and His word, which has rules and regulations that shapes us for our own good. Coming from a Christian background, my initial reaction to gay marriage is that it is morally wrong. Consequently, after seeking the logical, instead of theological, side of the debate, I had to put my Christian morals aside, and look at the situation from a third person, unprejudiced standpoint. That opened the door for a debate that surprised many of my church members, family members, and I included. I found that I could not logically
Gay marriages should be banned because God did not intend women to sleep with each other, nor men with men. It is a major sin. Plus, children should not be taught that same sex relationships are permitted. The effects on young children being subjected to gay marriages is the major