Sensitive Item Essay

Approximately 2,800 records, including field reports, cables, and interview summaries, have been released to the public by National Archives. Conversations from the FBI, CIA, and congressional investigators discussing dead ends, exhausted leads, interviews, as well as the checking and rechecking of sources, are just a snippet of information now available to the public.

The information and images accumulated can be in turn be used within the intelligence community and shared with foreign law enforcements organizations providing them a snapshot of what was discovered to assist the United States with stopping

agents. They didn’t contain the contents of any U.S. military plans, or of any conversations between U.S. or foreign officials...But it will hardly surprise the organized terrorist groups, which already go to great lengths to avoid being monitored." (Cassidy 1). Snowden's revelations have only brought us alarming news on United States espionage upon their own people, which have individual rights to express what they wish to by the often cited First Amendment, even though they are being constantly surveyed upon sites such as Facebook and Yahoo where personal information is wholly visible by the government, even in the presence of privacy policies. Their logging of phone calls also puts many Americans at a severe risk of being targeted or put on further watch for choice words, and will not work on the intended, true terrorists to the country, as they do not use public communications system, at least not U.S. based ones. Even for the public, one will not have a phone call used for them as evidence unless it was recorded by a third party and it hints at their connection to a crime, disproving its pragmatic usage, even in higher

Intelligence was known about the terrorist locations. The article by Jones brings attention to the laws of government agencies sharing information between themselves. In reference to the 9/11 Commission Report it was recommended that more sharing of information take place. Suggesting that this would allow agencies to work together more cohesively. Allowing a larger spectrum to be aware of important aspects of watched individuals, groups, cells, militia, etc. The author, Jones, outlines advantages of agencies both local, state, and federal working together. He puts insight on the history of sharing information before 9/11, and after September 11th. The changes that were brought as a result of the attacks are reviewed as well. Each individual intelligence agency can be applauded for the information they have individually collected. The information is sorted, stored, and then becomes what? A notch in the belt of the agency? A job well done of sorts. “The 9/11 Commission Report recommended there be “unity of effort” in the sharing of intelligence” (Jones, 2011).

After the horrific attacks of 9/11, the U.S. Government created the Department of Homeland Security, which then created over 220 different organizations and agencies to combat terrorism and collect intelligence. These agencies and organizations receive orders and directions from the National Intelligence Agency, and employees over 850,000 government employees with an approximate annual budget of $100 million. With a large annual budget and multiple employees working domestically and with foreign policy, the intelligence function has changed dramatically over the last decade and a half. Foreign governments have scrutinized the National Intelligence (NI) community for monitoring foreign militaries, and their government’s intentions

This paper will focus on the Intelligence Communities lessons learned prior to September 11, 2001 and what changes have occurred through to present day; regarding specifically information sharing. The review of literature in this paper focused to two questions: (1) Has the Intelligence Community improved its information sharing since 9/11? (2) What changes have taken place and what has been the impact of those changes?

The CIA and the National Security Council (NSC) have a long track record of using technology to intercept and communicate possible terrorist threats to officials. However, after the Cold War, cuts were made in national security funding and consequently diminished the CIA ability to track and

As we know there are many factors that attribute failure in our IC community. Like Kennedy said, lack of communication between collectors is one of them. Kennedy used example of how our nation failed to evaluate the Saddam’s WMD capabilities and it is prime example of failing to share the intelligence between agencies. Kennedy argues that collectors have considerable discretion of what information will get passed to analysts and sometimes vital but seemingly irrelevant information could be the key information that completes the mosaic.

All US services utilize airpower to sustain the three pillars of the 2014 QDR : protect the homeland; build security globally; and project power and win decisively. There are many ways the services provide airpower support, but this paper only touched on one for each pillar. For the protection of the homeland, cyber security was the way that was shown. A current example of the importance of cyber security is the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) data breach. This breach allowed the theft of personal information, including but not limited to social security numbers, belonging to millions of Federal employees, their spouses, and others. For the pillar of building global security, the support of our allies and partners was the method

Unlike Yoshikawa, Kuehn was not in a position where he needed to lay low and attract attention. Kuehn threw lavish parties at his large home and invited military officers to these parties and gleaned information from casual conversation. He was a retired doctor, an aspiring Hawaiian historian, and an inventor. Through Kuehn’s many stories over any topic, the community started to like him, which made blending in where a Japanese man would have been unable to easier (Bombs Over Pearl Harbor, 2003, p. 42-43; Jamison, 2014; "World War II, n.d.).

Since there is little discipline regarding the semantics of intelligence, it is important to first define covert action and categorize the various methods in which it has been carried out. For the purpose of this paper, “covert” will be used synonymously with “clandestine” and will take on the definition that Congress provided in the 1991 amended version of the National Security Act, Sec. 503 (e):

Survival time is not measured instantaneously. In other words, one has to wait for the

If the information was to be in any relation to terrorism, any US citizen would understand the severity especially after the 9/11 event. But without any relation to any terrorism, it basically means that the US government is spying. This is a controversial topic that brought confusion.

There are four occurrences in military history where the military itself became affected by the failure of technology and training and the vast amount of money being spent, created the military to not reveal either the whole operation or specific aspects of the operation to the public. Examples of this would be three operations and one agency. First operation is the USS Scorpion recovery second, Glomar Explorer recovery operation and the Eagle Claw operation. The agency that also exhibited these different aspects was the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). These different operations and agency provide an example of either of the reasons why the military was not willing to reveal these operations or agency to the

Censorship is a dirty word to information professionals. Attempts by individuals or groups to restrict the public from reading, hearing or viewing certain materials due to their content, is enough to send librarian's and organizations such as the American Library Association, to the proverbial battle field. However, information professionals from all fields have to make choices about what to include and what not to include in their particular library's collection. How are these selections made? What causes one item to be selected instead of another? The distinction between censorship and selection is infinitesimal, dependent mainly upon the role of the individuals involved. As an information professional, who inherently is