preview

Shark Culling Persuasive Speech

Decent Essays

Intro:
Sharks are a fundamental aspect of Australian waters, but shark culling has rapidly decreased the numbers over the past few years. The government definitely should not adopt a policy on shark culling, as sharks are the cornerstone to the contribution of social, environmental, economic and political aspects of our nation. If governments adopt this policy on shark culling, it will undoubtedly have a deliberate impact on the food chain. Additionally, even killing small numbers of already-threatened sharks will rapidly increase extinction risks of sharks. To conclude, humans contribute to the killing of more deaths than the opposite action done from sharks.
Para 1:
The food chain will undoubtedly and deliberately be impacted, if the governments adopt a policy on shark culling. Sharks are known as one of the top underwater predators, and if the government adopts this policy in Australia, it will massively impact the food chain. This means that there will be an abundancy on the organisms that sharks prey on. According to the National Ocean …show more content…

You may imagine or think just killing a couple of sharks will balance the offspring and killing ratio, but this is not necessarily the case. According to Wonderpolis, around 100 million sharks are killed by humans each year just by finning for trade and consuming. There are now only around a billion sharks left in the world. This means that in around ten years, shark numbers will be close to extinction until something is done. Featured in a news report, 700 sharks were culled in the waters of Queensland, and Great White Sharks only have a population of approximately 2500 left. How can you think that just killing numbers of sharks each time will not harm sharks? Small numbers of sharks killed by humans everyday can rapidly increase the extinction risks of these innocent creatures, and the ratio is

Get Access