Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Collegiate sports have turned into a billion dollar industry and are probably just as popular, if not more popular than professional sports. College athletes put their bodies on the line to play a sport they love, many with hopes and dreams to one day make it to the professional leagues. Athletic facilities are the major money makers for all universities. Colleges bring in billions of dollars in revenue annually, yet athletes do not get paid. Some fans believe athletes should not get paid due to their sports level being “amateurish.”; however, this is far from the truth. There is much more to being a college athlete than just practicing and playing games. These student-athletes must practice, weight lift, go to meetings, travel, go to tutoring and study groups, all the while maintaining sufficient grades. This is very tedious work and is very time consuming. College athletes have a high standard to live up to (Frederick Web; Huma Web; Patterson Web ).

What college athlete would not want to be paid to play the sport that he or she loves? The real question is, though, should college athletes be paid for their roles in a college’s athletics? They are many points to each side of this recent controversial topic, which is why this has been made into such a hot debate in the past couple of years. As of right now, these athletes are not getting paid, but many of them truly believe that they should. Others believe that they already are being paid through certain types of scholarships and don’t deserve anything more than that. With that being said, there are two sides of this topic that have quality points.

College sports are one of the largest and fastest growing markets in today’s culture. With some college sports games attracting more viewers than their professional counterparts, the NCAA is one of the most profiting organizations in America. Recently there has been controversy in the world of college sports as to whether the college athletes that are making their universities and the NCAA money should receive payment while they are playing their respective sport. Many believe that these athletes should be paid. Others argue that they are already receiving numerous benefits for playing that sport from their universities. Many of the proponents of paying college athletes are current or former college athletes who believe their hard work and hours put into practice and competing go under appreciated. They feel that while the athletes are making the university money, the athletes do not receive any cut of these profits. Opponents feel that athletes already receive numerous perks and should not receive extra compensation on top of the perks they already receive.

In America sports wherever there is people, there will also be sports. Sports have played a major role in American history. To some people sports is all they have. It is just the way that things are. The issue in sports now is that the NCAA exploit the sports world and the very backbone of the corporation is the poorest. It is an issue that has been around for quite some time now. The issue is that the sports world face is the fact that college athletes are not paid, although they perform in a multibillion dollar industry. The NCAA basically has a monopoly on college athletics, and generate about one billion dollars a year. College sports are extremely demanding both in and out of season, and these athletes put their future on the line. The NCAA should be legally obligated to compensate athletes, based solely on the fact that the money made, is from their performance.

Over the last decade, the question of whether or not to pay collegiate student-athletes has

Imagine, if you were in college, and a football player, spending all your time and energy playing football and you are being paid. You work your way up to the NFL tryouts and haven’t been picked . Wouldn’t you be devastated. Now you have nothing else to do. You should’ve focused on something to lean back on in case this would have happened. The article I read was, ‘Should College Athletes be Paid?’. The topic was that people are considering paying college football players. But I don’t beleive that should happen. I chose this considering that anything involving college has always been of interest. Especially on this problem, whether the college’s money should fund a sport.

Luckily their revenues do not correspond. Spending millions more to pay players would only make a more difficult financial situation for schools that are already subsidizing athletics. If they expand athletic costs by millions of dollars, that means they’ll be draining the academic budgets even more than they already are. Although Huma, the NCPA and CAPA president says, “The idea that there 's not enough revenue out there is ridiculous. The major conferences recently signed television deals worth an additional $1.2 billion over their previous deals,” he says. He also notes that “schools already share athletic revenue in a variety of ways. If the NCAA is seriously worried about the schools that aren 't making money, the association could institute a revenue-sharing program that would distribute the money more equitably.” (Huma, 2014). Even though student athletes work incredibly hard to not only stay good but also thrive in their collegiate endeavors, that doesn’t mean the university they attend should pay them for it. That’s their choice to play, college is a place for obtaining an education. Not trying to get paid for playing a sport like a professional. The question of whether or not student athletes should get paid arises primarily in reference to student athletes who play football and basketball at NCAA Division I institutions with high profile and high income athletic programs. The argument is that because some institutions receive millions of dollars from the

My main point is not all college athletes being paid, but the ones who bring fans flocking to their stadiums, and selling jerseys for almost 100 dollars those types of players deserve to be paid. The only problem is the fact that college sports was founded on an amateur basis. Which by definition of amateur (a person who engages in a pursuit, especially a sport, on an unpaid basis) you cannot be paid. However if the NCAA does not find a way to change in benefit of the players they could lose control over many athletes. The Biggest fear is that players will soon begin to protest or ban playing college athletics before entering into the Professional

One of the most asked questions among the NCAA and college boards around the nation, is whether or not college athletes should be paid or not. There have been many debates over this frequently discussed topic. There are many articles on both sides, these articles mainly discuss one side of the issue. Even though there are many articles talking about this people today still wonder what everyone else’s side it. My personal belief is that college athletes should get paid because it can really help out the students. College athletes deserve to be paid for many different reasons.

Imagine being one of the best employees working for a billion dollar industry, but despite that, you aren’t paid. That is the reality for college athletes, who should be paid for their athletic ability. In the United States, four hundred thousand athletes are part of the NCAA. Yet, none of the athletes are paid. College athletes should be paid because they make the events possible, and those events generate billions of dollars in profit.

College sports have gained a lot of positive attention over the past couple of years due to the athletes’ passion and desire for the sports. Being nationally televised and making it deep into big tournaments can rack up a lot of wealth that colleges and universities can respectively cash in. Only the schools and sponsors of these profiting tournaments and bowl games collect the profits that athletes bring in and it is not fair. The athletes do not garner any benefits for the timeless hours and dedication they put into their sports. College athletes should be paid because they bring in an extensive amount of money and publicity to colleges and

College athletes should not get paid to play a sport because they are playing for the love of the game. Many athletes get scholarships or benefits to play a sport in the first place which means that they don’t need any more money. Sports should be a reward for good grades and only players that really love the sport should play it. Any athlete should just play the sport for fun and not money. It’s way too difficult to pay a college athlete because each athlete plays differently. The NCAA, an organization dedicated to college athletes,

Imagine you are a college athlete. You have worked hard throughout your life to get to where you are today, a Division I college athlete. However, the grind doesn’t stop there. You still have to put in about 40 hours each week on your sport, attend mandatory team workouts and meetings, and travel and compete for your school. Not to mention you still have difficult college classes, sleep, and your social life to worry about. You are well aware of the sacrifices you have to make, but your school? Now that’s another story. They require you to hold a certain GPA and play well enough to keep your hard-earned scholarship, and when you do well on the field, no matter how many awards you win, the school gets the ultimate prize: Money. Yes, college athletes receive scholarships, which do cover a good amount of the cost of college. However, do they cover textbooks and meal plans and other numerous expenses? Former NCAA basketball Final Four MVP Shabazz Napier said “ there are hungry nights that I go to bed and I’m starving”. If this doesn’t tell the NCAA that something is wrong, what will? I strongly believe that NCAA Division I athletes should be paid a certain amount of money because they make money for the NCAA. Therefore, they should be treated like any other paid employee and receive fair compensation. Not paying the athletes is likely an antitrust violation and also morally wrong.

Student-athletes bring in a lot of revenue for their college and the amount they bring in is too much for the players not to receive compensation. In 2015, Texas A&M brought in “$192.6 million in revenue”(Gaines). Although this money will go back to the athletes indirectly for example, better transportation, better meals, etc. This doesn’t help the players directly and the cost of these upgrades is only a small fraction of what the colleges make. Plus, collegiate athletic programs are concerned with the “now” rather than the “later”. Many collegiate basketball players only use college to fulfill the National Basketball Association’s rule of attending School for a year. “This would possibly increase graduation rates, allow fans to see their favorite players mature through college, and ensure coaches are preparing athletes as much as possible for the next level” (Lemmons). If colleges pay athletes then their chances of staying would increase rather than rush to professionals for the paycheck. If players stay then those fans will buy more tickets which would increase the revenue the Colleges

Some college athletes were starving in their dorm after practicing and playing in games for a week straight. Since they make no money from the sport the play they decided to call and beg their coach to buy food for them. Recently the have been pushing him to talk to someone about getting them paid to play college football. This isn’t the only time this has happened. Student compensation has been a big topic in the world of sports. The NCAA has been an amateur league ever since its creation. It was never thought of widely to pay college athletes 10-20 years ago but many are thinking it may be it may be time to start paying the athletes. Since the beginning of college sports and the NCAA there have been many debates on whether or not college