Should College Athletes Be Paid

First, paying the college athletes would make intercollege athletic sports more competitive. When these students in the

College sports is a multi-billion dollar industry. Each year thousands of high school students are recruited to play college sports, but under strict conditions. Students are required to do well in athletics while keeping up with their academics. College athletes spend up to forty five hours per week on practices, training, and games. In addition, they spend roughly forty hours on their academics. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletics Association) does not think it is necessary to pay these athletes because they want to maintain the “amateur sport” status. According to Stanley Eitzen in his “College Athletes should be Paid, “The universities and the NCAA claim their athletes in big-time sports programs

Now, paying these athletes doesn’t have to be for everyone. Only the high caliber, D1 athletes. The D1 athletes put in all this time and effort to get a scholarship, but don’t see any money. Now that’s not right. These D1 caliber players don’t come around all the time. There are not many of them. Plus the schools that do have these players are super rich. “These teams not only provide their supporters with a steady source of entertainment, but their performance also helps bring notoriety and pride to the universities they represent. College athletics, especially the so-called "revenue sports" of men 's basketball and football, is now a multi-million dollar business that is marketed, packaged, and sold in the same manner as other commercial products” (Acain).

In recent years mixed feeling have been discussed over college student athletes getting paid. Some feel that players should be rewarded for the huge amount of revenue generated on behalf of their play. Especially when coaches are receiving huge multi million dollar contracts. Currently, NCAA rules do not allow players to receive any compensation. The non-fiction article, “Should College Player get Paid?”, written by Michael Gonchar, explains how NCAA classifies Division I football players as amateurs, not professionals, student-athletes, not employees, which is how colleges get away with paying them nothing. With respect to how hard and how much time college athletes put in, college football players should not get paid due to scholarships, playing is a privilege not a job, and money allocation . They should how ever be compensated, such as

Many people disagree on the argument whether or not college athletes should receive compensation. For starters college athletes shouldn’t be paid because there are no other scholarships or college activities that offer compensation. College athletes are not professionals they’re still just amateurs competing against other amateurs. “The NCAA’s position is that they are amateurs, people who play for the love of the game, not for personal gain. The players’ first priority, the NCAA says, is receiving a good education” (“Compensation for College Athletes”1). If a student goes to college their main focus should be on educating themselves and in a way college athletics is their lesson preparing them to make money with that profession. College athletes should not gain monetary compensation because they already receive

They are fundamentally exploited by a system that makes not millions of dollars, but billions of dollars, and that enriches everybody around expect themselves”- Joe Nocera (Should the NCAA Pay College Athletes?). In an effort to draw a clear line between college and professional sports, the National Collegiate Athletic Association has prohibited the payment of athletes for their sports related skills by emphasizing that college sport is one of the many branches of the educational program. However, it is my belief that the established guidelines by the NCAA seem to unjustifiably limit the opportunities and success that a student-athlete could have, thus, new rules should be implemented that allow athletes to be fairly financially compensated for their talents.

Over the past few decades, college athletics have grown in popularity, making collegiate sports the most revenue producing attraction at a college or university. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) additionally receives an abundant share of the revenue the colleges have profited. With the two large corporations receiving this share of money, the debate as to whether college athletes should be compensated beyond the traditional scholarship has become an issue in all colleges and universities. To avoid the athletes thinking they are not being acknowledged for their worth, the National Collegiate Athletic Association should establish new means to compensate college athletes that does not involve any form of an employee salary.

As the debate of whether or not athletes should be paid grows, it is understandable why some people would say they shouldn’t. For example it would basically be an unfair playing field as you will have teams such as Alabama worth approximately $683 million dollars compared to a much smaller college like a Missouri State at $66 million. This will cause a major problem and only further the uneven gap that bigger schools already have over smaller ones. Another argument is the benefits the athletes receive from scholarships. Some will argue that athletes who are attending school on scholarships will say that they are basically getting a free education, including free books, and sometimes free or reduced living through the dormitory system provided by the universities

One could feel like paying the college athletes is wrong. One could debate on whether college-student athlete in the U.S. should be paid or not in 2014. One author explains that the college athletes are not considered professional athletes, and therefore should not be given salaries(Mitchell 17). I agree that players are not “abused” just because universities make money from their games. I would suggest that their “four year free ride” is not reasonable compensation for their efforts( ). College athletes need money just like professional athletes. College athletes deserve to be treated like professional athletes.

College sports is a business that brings in a lot of money to schools and athletic programs. Division I college athletes, particularly football and basketball players, get many perks for contributing to the team’s season and devoting so much time to the sport. What is not often thought about is the money that football and basketball brings in and what the athletes get in return for bringing this money to the university. Many athletes are taken advantage of because the schools use the money for their own benefit, do not take into consideration the athletes busy schedule and not having time for a job, their living and medical expenses, and how important they are to bringing in money for the school.

Paying College Athletes should be allowed under NCAA rules, because it let’s the athletes know and feel like they are appreciated. Being paid for doing something you dedicate your time to and exceed greatly in there should be a monetary reward. Student athletes in college should be paid for dedicating all their time into the sport, but also well balancing their grades too. Paying the athletes will help the athletes have pocket money and not making them having to make time for a job either.

How many college athletic events do you watch a year? Every time you turn on the television, chances are some type of college sport will be on. In the last decade a serious question has arisen: Should we pay college athletes? They provide entertainment in the same way professional athletes do when they are on the field, and they are familiarized with the pressures of professional athletes. But with this in question, there are numerous arguments. Some will argue that many athletes have their tuition paid in full so there is no need for additional money, while others will argue that they are at college for an education not a paycheck. According to an article on NCAA and college sports, “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million” (Mitchell). These athletes devote the majority of their time to practicing their sport, and then put those talents on display for millions of people across the world to watch. I believe it is time we begin to compensate college athletes for the enormous amount of revenue they generate for the NCAA.

Student- Athletes should not be paid because they are exactly that, they are student- athletes not professional athletes. The number one priority of the collegiate athlete is to be a full time student not a full time athlete. Secondly, paying players would force schools that are already tight on money to shut down or leave division 1. Finally, paying players would force non-revenue sports such as golf, tennis and most women’s sports to be cut at most universities.

this case, the question is whether or not college athletes should be paid. I do not feel as though college athletes should be paid because it is unethical and pointless to reward them any more than what they already receive. A free education is one of the best gifts anyone can receive, what more could a person really want on top of that? The purpose of college athletics are to help athletes continue their careers with the intention or goal of later going on into the professional athletic field; therefore, this should be a free stepping stone for them until they enter a bigger pool of sharks where the competition is better and higher, and pay is actually mandated because of the skill level.

would also disrupt schools’ financial flows by paying school athletes because then that would mean schools would have to pay every sport on their program. Who decides who gets paid? You cannot pay football players without paying baseball players just because is a less popular sport in college, which makes finding a fair way to pay all college players nearly