Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults Essay

One reason is because a juvenile does not have the level of maturity, thought process, decision-making, experience, or wisdom that an adult has, so they should not be subjected to the harsher adult punishments. Another reason is because juvenile courts decide how best to help juvenile offenders while protecting the interests of the public in maintaining an orderly society. Also, another reason that juvenile courts are need is because a younger offender if given the chance to be rehabilitated instead of harshly punished has a higher chance of change than that of someone set in their ways, which coincides with the presumptions that the juvenile court system follows in regards to juvenile

There are many controversies that surround juveniles being rehabilitated rather than going through the adult justice system, but studies show that juveniles are not fully developed to be tried as an adult. One of the main questions that it always boils down to is “should juveniles be tried as adults?” in my opinion juveniles should not be tried as adults because of their age.

There are three basic arguments in favor of retaining the Juvenile Justice System. The first argument is based on the minor's mental abilities. Many people believe that children are not as mentally

It has been one hundred years since the creation of the juvenile court in the United States. The court and the juvenile justice system has made some positive changes in the lives of millions of young people lives over the course or those years, within the last thirteen years there has been some daunting challenges in the system.

The juvenile justice system was fashioned in the late 1800s; restructuring policies in the United States concerning adolescent offenders was a part of a progressive era in are history. Thereafter, many modifications designed at both safeguarding the "due process of law" rights of adolescence, and generating an antipathy to jail amongst minor. This dislike has made juvenile justice system more equivalent to the adult structure, a significant change from what it was intended for in the

The book “No Matter How Loud I Shout” written by Edward Humes, looks at numerous major conflicts within the juvenile court system. There is a need for the juvenile system to rehabilitate the children away from their lives of crime, but it also needs to protect the public from the most violent and dangerous of its juveniles, causing one primary conflict. Further conflict arises with how the court is able to administer proper treatment or punishment and the rights of the child too due process. The final key issue is between those that call for a complete overhaul of the system, and the others who think it should just be taken apart. On both sides there is strong reasoning that supports each of their views, causing a lot of debate about the

The U.S made legal history in 1989 when the world’s first juvenile court opened in Chicago (Rank, J.) Since 1990 many states have also adopted the “get tough” approach to juvenile justice as a response to the increasingly violent crimes committed by children.

The juvenile justice system has long been in debate over whether its focus should be rehabilitation or punishment. From its birth in the early 20th century, the juvenile justice system has changed its focus from punishment to rehabilitation and back many times. Some say the juvenile justice system should be abolished and juveniles tried as adults, yet studies indicate punishment and imprisonment do not rehabilitate juvenile offenders; therefore, the juvenile justice system should remain

According to Schiraldi and Drizin (1999), the first juvenile court in the United States was founded in Chicago in 1899 after a young lawyer named John Altgeld toured the House of Corrections and found hundreds of children as young as 8 years old jailed with adults. The Cook County Juvenile Court was created to rehabilitate instead of punishing the offenders under 16 years of age. In other words, for the juvenile court judges to treat rather than to punish juveniles placing attention on the offender instead of the offense. Most importantly, for the children to receive a second chance and keep them away from the adults in jails. Certainly, “jails and prisons clearly were no places for children” (Bartollas & Miller, 2017, p.5).

Juvenile courts are based off of the idea parens patriae, which means that the court should act as a guardian for juveniles rather than as a punisher. Juvenile courts were made to protect and advocate for troubled juveniles who needed help. Before juvenile courts, children were tried as adults, but as a new court has been formed, differences between adult and juvenile courts have appeared.

A ten year old in Prison? In the last few years there's been a debate if juveniles should be sentenced as adults and some people are saying that juveniles knows right from wrong in the justice system and they need to be tried, to the extent of the law, then there are others that are saying that the juveniles are in danger being around adult criminals and they can turn into a full blown criminal. Juveniles should not be sentenced as adults because it’s giving them the impression that will have no future along with when they are released they are most likely to commit even more heinous crimes.   In fact, Juveniles being sentenced adults are giving the juveniles the impression that they will stay has a criminal without being helped.

Background information In February 2007 State police found 26-year-old Kaitlyn Cruise in her bedroom shot with a bullet hole to the head. She was eight months pregnant. The search for the killer ended up with the most surprising result, a 12-year-old boy, the stepson of the victim. He is one of the youngest suspects to be charged with double homicide in the states. If convicted, the boy could face up to life in prison without patrol.

Should Juveniles be tried as Adults? Consider the following situation, “14 year old Nathaniel Brazill was found guilty for the murder of his English Professor last year. A charge of this degree usually comes with a prison sentence up to 30 years, but Brazille’s defense team is hopeful the judge will be more lenient in this case. Brazill’s team is riding on a powerful ally, Jeb bush, who said “There is a different standard for children, there should be some sensitivity that a 14 year-old is not a little adult” (Reaves 1). This is only one example of the argument against whether or not children should begin to be prosecuted as adults, an argument being found in more and more court rooms today.

Kids should be subjected to the measures of punishment that our judicial system is giving to them. Kids who show lots of enmity should be tried as adults. It is the only way to protect the innocent children. These kids know right from wrong, but they choose to do the wrong things and violence is wrong. As the laws have gotten stricter on discipline the kids have gotten wilder. When we let society tell us how to discipline our children then violent children is the result.

Crimes are most associated with adults. Murder is especially most associated with adults. When a teenager commits such a crime such as murder they must be tried, and they should not be treated with leniency and coddling, but with the full force of the law as an adult.