Sigmund Freud 's Theory Of Psychology

The Psychodynamic Model, developed by Sigmund Freud, views the cause of mental disorders as the result of childhood trauma, anxieties, and unconscious conflicts. According to Freud, human behavior tends to express instinctual drives that function at the unconscious level. These instinctual drives can be afflicted with sexual or aggressive impulses and any threatening experiences that we block from our consciousness which results in emotional symptoms.

Freud proposed the psychological structure of personality to include three systems called the id, the ego, and the superego. At birth, the id is the original system of personality and is ruled by the pleasure principle. It is driven towards satisfying instinctual needs. The ego can be described as a mediator between ones instincts and their surrounding environment. The ego is ruled by the reality principle, using realistic and logical thinking to formulate action plans for satisfying needs. The superego includes a person’s moral code and strives for perfection, not pleasure. Psychic energy is distributed between these three systems creating dynamics of personality. This psychic energy is what determines behavior (Day, 2008).

Psychoanalysis is an approach to psychology that was made well known as a way to bring for the unconscious to the conscious. It is theorized that the memories that we store in our unconscious affects us, and can cause neurotic behaviors. The approaches also include Analytical, Individual. Three people that worked on these theories are Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and Alfred Adler. Each of these men approached psychoanalysis in both similar and individual ways, and have their own theories that will be further discusses within this essay.

Finally here we have what Freud call the unconscious it contains your thoughts feelings desires, memories that influence your daily existence (Ex: having feelings of anger towards someone or a traumatic event you may have experienced at an early age).

Personality is what makes people who they are. Some people have different personalities others have very similar personalities; but nobody’s personality is exactly the same. In the past many people have tried to understand personality and explain it through theories. This paper, will discuss the differences between the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and Alfred Adler. It will then show the characteristics of which I agree with as well as the characteristics that I disagree with. Furthermore, it will describe the stages of Freud’s theory and explain the characteristics of personality using these components; And finally, I will describe uses of three Freudian defense mechanisms by using real life examples.

Sigmund Freud, known as the Father of Psychoanalysis, explored the human mind more thoroughly than any of his colleagues before him. With his intense studies, he created the topographical model of personality. The topographical model distinguished three key things which creates ones' personality that deals with ones' consciousness. The most important aspect is the Ego, which is the balancing act for the Id and the Superego. While the Id seeks to fulfill ones' desires on impulse, the Superego tends to think of a more morally acceptable way to get ones' desire fulfilled. When the demands of ones' desires are too stressful to comprehend for the Id and the superego, defense mechanisms are commonly used to protect the Ego from the distressing anxiety.

The concept of psychological evaluation covers a range of techniques and theories that have evolved and developed throughout history. Understanding and comparing different theories to explain behaviour is important to further understand the behaviours of humans, how these behaviours are explained by psychologists and how these theories have changed over time and compare to each other. Psychodynamic theory, developed first by Sigmund Freud, attempts to explain human behaviour in relation to subconscious processes outside of the individuals awareness, that have their origins in childhood experiences (Deal, Kathleen Holtz, Psychodynamic Theory, Advances in Social Work8.1 (2007): 184-195.). Freud developed Drive Theory, founded on the belief that

Sigmund Freud created strong theories in science and medicine that are still studied today. Freud was a neurologist who proposed many distinctive theories in psychiatry, all based upon the method of psychoanalysis. Some of his key concepts include the ego/superego/id, free association, trauma/fantasy, dream interpretation, and jokes and the unconscious. “Freud remained a determinist throughout his life, believing that all vital phenomena, including psychological phenomena like thoughts, feelings and phantasies, are rigidly determined by the principle of cause and effect” (Storr, 1989, p. 2). Through the discussion of those central concepts, Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis becomes clear as to how he construed human character.

Sigmund Freud, was a neurologist that mainly focused on psychoanalytical theories for psychology. His most famous research was done during the late 19th and early 20th century, in which during this time he wrote one of his most famous works Civilization and Its Discontents. In this book of his, Freud manages to draw on many Enlightenment ideals and challenges some of these notions through his theoretical analysis on the subconscious mind. In this book of his, Freud proposes that individual’s minds are divided into three distinct parts comprised of the ego, super-ego, and the id. In his analysis on these three parts of the mind, Freud encourageous individuals to regard their mind in emotional qualities that are characterized by the id, ego,

Ever since Sigmund Freud developed psychoanalysis theory, its applicability has been extended beyond therapy to literature. In the interpretation of dreams, Sigmund Freud coins the term the oedipus complex in reference to the greek mythology of Oedipus the king. The application of psychoanalysis to myth is treated by Dowden with scepticism and he states that the only significance of the psychoanalytic approach is in its recognition of how fundamental the images that recur in the myth are (Dowden, 1992, p.23). This essay will argue that Dowden’s treatment of the theory of psychoanalysis is valid but needs to be supplemented with a more comprehensive view of psychoanalysis and the various arguments for scepticism towards psychoanalysis.

According to Freud, one must first understand the levels of consciousness to understand his theory of dreaming. The conscious level is what we are aware of. They are the normal day to day activities/thoughts we recognize exist. (Cervone & Pervin, 2013) The preconscious are the mental contents which we could become aware of, if brought to our attention. (Cervone & Pervin, 2013) For example, you may not be currently thinking of what you had for breakfast this morning, but if someone asked you, you should be able to recall this information. The unconscious are thoughts a person is unaware of and cannot be brought to the conscious. (Cervone & Pervin, 2013) For example, a traumatic experience provoking anxiety, may cause someone to force the incident or thoughts about the incident into the unconscious to protect

This passage from “Psycho-analysis,” Sigmund Freud’s essay detailing the origins, methods, and applications of his theory of psychoanalysis, reveals the utility of his approach in understanding what lies beneath the surface through the interpretation of dreams, which later psychoanalytic critics related to the interpretation of literature. Freud’s description of his psychoanalytic theory considers it an approach to unlocking knowledge that is impossible to discover through prior methods of psychology and that is applicable across all areas of the sciences and humanities. Here, students of Freud’s theory can find correlations between psychoanalysis to both structuralism and deconstruction through his method of interpreting dreams, which

Psychoanalysis is a school of thought first developed by Sigmeund Freud(1856-1939) one of the most influential psychologists to date. Although Psychoanalysis has been developed over years since Freud’s death mainly by Erik Erikson, there are still key elements which remain the same. Freud’s approach to the human mind mainly focused on the unconscious

Sigmund Freud contributed more to the modern psychological research landscape than any of his contemporaries. Throughout his career he created one of the first empirically based methods of understanding the human psyche. These methods are often summarized under the term Psychoanalysis and it is defined by a series of theories which connect the human experience to human behaviors and motivations. These theories consist of development analyses based around psychological, physiological, and psychosexual growth. The ID-Ego-Superego relationship developed by Freud attempts to categorically sort the different elements of human desires that combine to create a picture of a healthy mind. Applying these conceptual divides to specific systems

In spite of his increasingly disparaged legacy in the field of science, Sigmund Freud is inarguably regarded as a watershed in the development of psychology. In observing his theories of psychosexual development, one might discern the earliest roots of modern developmental psychology. The nuances of such a lineage, however, can be found in a heated schism within the psychoanalytic community. From 1941-1944, two prominent neo-Freudians engaged in what came to be known as their “controversial discussions” (Mijolla, 2005). In their attempts to apply Freudian psychoanalysis to childhood development, Melanie Klein and Anna Freud would frequently clash on matters of technique, application, and practice. These notably public altercations ultimately polarized the London Psycho-Analysis Society, producing two distinct camps in contemporary theory (Mijolla, 2005). Beyond the field of psychoanalysis, however, one might see how such a dialectical relationship laid the groundwork for modern watersheds of developmental psychology. In constantly refuting and countering the other, Klein and Anna both produced a lucrative body of work that would alternatively advance developmental theory and practice.