Did you know that characters from different books can have many things in common? Caitlin O’Koren’s best friend, Rina Swain, is a go-getting, playful, beautiful girl. Asher, Jonas’s closest pal, is a goofy, trouble-making boy. Rina Swain from Dreamland and Asher from The Giver have similarities and differences. Rina Swain and Asher are outgoing, fun loving friends that have much in common. For example, “"Cheerleading is a sport," Rina said firmly. "And besides, you get to go to all the good parties"” (Dessen, 28). Rina always has a spring in her step, and looks for fun and excitement. Like Rina, Asher’s always funny and joyous. In addition, “Jonas had casually picked up an apple… and thrown it to his friend. Asher had thrown it back, and they had begun a simple game of catch” (Lowry, 22 and 23). Asher wants to play games, have fun, and hang out with Jonas. Rina loves to socialize with her friend, Caitlin, just like Asher. …show more content…
For example, “Two heavyset girls sitting farther down looked over, their eyes traveling up and down Rina from her face to her toes” (Dessen, 30). Rina has always been the girl people want to be and jealous of. In Asher’s case, nobody wants to be him, they think he’s funny and weird. “"Sure" Asher smiled, his usual smile, friendly and familiar. But Jonas felt a moment of hesitation from his friend, an uncertainty” (Lowry, 64). Asher is jealous of Jonas and his new Assignment, he wants to be an ‘important person’. Rina is the ‘important person’ in this instant, unlike Asher and his ordinariness. Rina and Asher can be fairly different sometimes. Rina Swain and Asher have many similarities and some differences. Both of the characters help their friend become who they really are and realize that not everything’s perfect. People of different cultures can be extremely alike in several different ways, so we need to put an end to thinking our culture is the more dominant
The diversity of culture is an incredible notion. It is unfathomable how the anatomy of the human race is so similar, yet so different in the behaviors and ideas that take place. The two primary cultures I am focusing on throughout this essay are the differentiation between popular culture, and indigenous culture. I will also make the point of folk culture, and how it has slowly transformed itself from its self sufficiency, to relying more on the ways of popular culture.
As Mahatma Gandhi said, “No culture can live, if it attempts to be exclusive” (Mahatma). Our culture identifies who we are and how we behave in social environments and provides us with a foundation in which to live our lives and raise our families. Each individual culture has certain customs and courtesies that are important. Exposure to the cultures of others can be intimidating and can leave a person feeling confused and unsure about how they fit in (Schaefer 60). Culture shock can leave a person feeling out of place in an unfamiliar culture (Schaefer 60). Our diverse societies demand understanding and acceptance of other cultures. Learning and understanding these cultures before being
another to certain stereotypes because they don’t understand what that culture is really like. It’s
Albert Einstein once said, “The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.” What he is trying to point out to everyone is that if someone is really good at math, it doesn’t mean that he/she has a good mindset, thinking wise. Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and The Giver by Lois Lowry are both books that have a similar idea of how a society is supposed to be run, but with different plots. In both books, the government took away the citizen’s power to think for themselves. Similarly, they both have main characters that release later on how messed up and nonperfect their community is.
children's lives. For young adults, those fairy tale characters give way to darker characters and
Have you ever thought about how much Cultural diversity affects our everyday life? I guess you could say the real question is ¨Is it more beneficial for a society for individuals to assimilate into a mainstream culture that unites them or should they seek to preserve the authentic and district ethnicity of their cultural backgrounds?¨ I stand to the side where we should seek to preserve the authentic and district ethnicity of our cultural backgrounds. I believe this because even though it is easier to live in a mainstream culture, people should seek to preserve the authentic and district ethnicity of their cultural backgrounds because being divergent is good for everyone, it shapes how people see the world, and God made each of us unique masterpieces.
Dystopian novels, such as Brave New World and The Giver, all portray warning signs towards the various outcomes of our future based on our actions of the past and present. In Brave New World, humans are bred in labs and are conditioned in specific ways, they hold artificial happiness in their hearts by their excessive use of Soma. In The Giver, we are presented with a world where war, crime, poverty, bigotry, and suffering has been completely eliminated. Here, people strive to maintain “sameness”, where everything and everyone is equal and the same. In both dystopian novels the struggle to maintain a perfect society backfires and warns present day society, this is the outcome if you keep on the path that you are on now.
Fortunately, embracing other people’s ways improves our knowledge of their uncommon cultures. The United States is an enormously diverse society.
“We don't want to be all the same but we want to understand each other.”(Taylor Swift). Everyone has a culture, some people really embrace it and some just follow it, but culture will affect everyone and the way they all have a culture but run into a problem and how they want to embrace their culture.
There are multiple different similarities in between “The Giver”: book and movie, and here are some examples. First, both had the main idea of a perfect world with no war, hunger, emotions, or color. This was because the Chief Elder did not want change. Another key similarity is that the book and movie had the same stories and characters. They both had the story of Rosemary and the same characters like Jonas, Fiona, Asher and Lily.
Similarities and differences happen in books and movies most of the time. Scenes in movies get short. They miss a few events that happened in the book and it’s different from the movie. We read and watched The Giver and these are the differences and similarities we noticed in the movie. There are a lot of differences in both movie and book.
When comparing cultures, one must form a definition of what culture is. Culture can be easily defined as the social behavior and normality’s found in human societies. It can also be easily made up of a composed arrangement of educated conduct and thought designs. Culture is a sorted out framework since it includes many parts. Throughout the world, there are many cultures that are both very different and also very similar. "Culture encompasses religion, food, what we wear, how we wear it, our language, marriage, music, what we believe is right or wrong, how we sit at table, how we greet visitors, how we behave and one million other things." (Cristina De Rossi.)
There are many dystopian stories out there that are about trying to create a perfect society that will last forever. I believe that this is impossible. It is impossible for us, imperfect human beings, to create something perfect in every way. But is fun to try and imagine what our version of a perfect society would be like. This is where these books come from, each entirely different from the next. The Giver by Lois Lowry and 1984 By George Orwell were two of the first dystopian stories ever. They opened up a whole new genre of books that many have branched off of. They are both about groups of people trying to create the perfect society, but they try to get the same result in different ways. They are similar in some aspects and different in
Is ignorance truly bliss? Is sacrificing some things—individuality, choice, even pain—worth achieving others, such as peace or control? In the literary world of The Giver, and likewise in The Matrix, citizens were blind to the reality—the reality that they were not living their own lives, but rather, lives that were predetermined by the powers that be, and as a result, they lacked the taste of true freedom. In each case, what was gained, whether it be order or power, in no way compensated for what was deprived of the oblivious slaves: true, authentic life.