Similarities Between The Ohio Constitution And The Us Constitution

The United States Constitution begins with the simple phrase “We the People”. Yet, with three simple words, the ideology it stands for has shaped the entire country (O’Connor et al., 2011). The short phrase signifies that the document, and thus, the government, is based upon the people themselves. The Constitution reflects the culture and ideologies of its citizens. Similarly, state constitutions reflect the people, albeit in a more specific locality. The key differences between the United States Constitution and that of local states are due to the distinctions between the scope and characteristics of the people they govern.

“The Constitution is the guide which I never will abandon,” is a famous quote from the first President of the United States, George Washington. An interesting fact about the Illinois and the Federal Constitution is how, Ilinois had 4 constitutions while the Federal government had only one constitution that can be amended. Another interesting fact is how the Federal Constitution has 4,543 words, while the Illinois Constitution has 34,362 words. The Illinois and the Federal Constitution have many similarities and differences, among the Legislative Branch, the lawmaking process, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch.

If there were too many differences, then the branches of government would be very chaotic because a lack of structure between the state and federal government. In the United States Constitution and Nevada constitution it outlines three structures of the government. They are both setup in the same and is broken into three different parts, The Legislature Department, The Executive Department and The Judiciary Department. In addition, both constitutions are broken up into articles and each article explains a general topic, but most important they both state in the preamble “We the People...” (THE CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA). This quote is significant because when the constitution is brought up, it is always the document of the people and the rights of the people. So it is important that no matter what, both constitutions had this quote within them. The United States Constitution and Nevada constitution don’t have significant differences because it reduces redundancy. The government for the citizens of Nevada is ran and structured the way they are today because of these two important

Generally speaking, State constitutions perform different functions (generally limit plenary powers rather than grant enumerated powers), have different origins (from the people

The Articles of Confederation and The Constitution are two documents that outlined the fundamental principles of the United States. The Articles of Confederation as written first and ratified in 1781. It was then replaced by The Constitution in 1789. They have similarities such as establishing it as The United States of America. However, they do have many differences. Three of these differences are voting in Congress, terms of legislative office, and the Executive branch of government.

In the year of 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to write the Constitution. Tyranny, a type of government with an absolute ruler, was a fear. The 55 delegates created the Constitution to prevent tyranny. So part of the Constitution created three parts of government; executive, legislative, and judicial branches (Document B). To prevent tyranny, each branch counteracted against each other (Document C). We also have a different kind of government called federalism (Document A). Federalism is a compound government which means it has two parts, central and state government. Central is the country’s view on taxes, laws, etc. State is when the state creates the individual taxes, establish schools, hold elections, etc in the state itself. We also

There were a lot more differences than similarities between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. Four years after the American Revolution, the United States were still not considered a unified government and it still longed to become one nation. Questions were raised regarding how local and national governments should be distributed; How and who should be implementing the laws; and how can they ensure that the government can protect the individual rights of the citizens? In order for these questions to be answered, the Articles of Confederation was established.

The United States has been governed under two constitutions. The first one was the Articles of Confederation which was ratified in 1781, the second constitution which replaced the article after being ratified in 1787. There are certain similarities and differences between the article of confederation with the new constitution of 1787, and strengths and weaknesses of the Article vis-à-vis the constitution. Haven compared the Article of confederation and the 1787 Constitution, we will look at the drafting of the constitution and the compromise made by various states to come out with an effective draft of the constitution, and finally compare the debate over ratification between the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist.

The United States of America has been working from the beginning to form a government that works for us. On the way we have had many different documents to help control our government. Two of these are the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution. There are many differences between them both, from what was sovereign under them to how they can be amended.

The simple difference between the Articles of Confederation and US Constitution is that the articles were not strong enough to hold our young nation together. The articles operated the US as separate states. Under the articles, it was very difficult to pass laws since the requirement of 9 out of the 13 states ' approval was needed for ratification. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government, leaving most of the power with the state governments. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The members of the Constitutional Convention signed the United States Constitution on September 17, 1787 in

Both the Articles and the Constitution are based on Federalism, the form of government where power is distributed through the central government and smaller republics. The difference between Federalism in the two documents is that the Constitution granted more power to the central government to govern the country as a whole. The federal government of the Constitution were now allowed to enforce laws, taxes, and handle money along with the state governments which affected the people (A). Along with these powers, the states could also regulate businesses, schools, and local governments (A), essentially allowing themselves to govern their state even without influence of the central government. The Constitution formed a strong compound federalist government that would provide double security to the rights of the people with two governments enforcing their laws and it prevented corruption of one government to influence the whole of the

Compare and contrast the Articles of confederation and the Constitution, especially in regard to the specific powers granted to the national government.The formation and ideals of the Articles of Confederation and its successor, the Unites States Constitution, varied from each other in terms of a stronger or weaker federal government in dealing with issues. The Constitution gave more power to the federal government, while the Articles of Confederation involved a very weak government with primary rights interests of the individual states as the focus. Both gave Congress legislative power and set up departments that would eventually be incorporated into the president’s cabinet. The formation of the Articles of Confederation was of the

In my humble opinion, State Constitutions should differ from the United States Constitution, as it gives a deeper sense of independence and corresponds to the needs of that particular state. The Declaration of Independence is a prime example of independence, as though I concur that each state is to be shadowed by the United States Constitution. You cannot anticipate what benefits a society within a state that borders the ocean will be beneficial to a state surrounded by mountains, as common sense allows us to determine the economic and geological demands will differ to a degree as well as people's beliefs. Some people are vegetarians and others are avid hunters, and the scope is really too broad to categorize this volume of diversity under one constitution. From religion to what makes an economy function, one constitution cannot "blanket" an entire nation and everything run like clockwork.

The Constitution is a very well organized and well thought out document that holds strong bases for the future of America, unlike the Articles of Confederation. The constitution is ultimately more detailed and intricate, giving a less questionable guideline to any future problems which may come to rise. For example, the Articles of Confederation gives us Congress, unicameral. The Constitution gives us Congress, and divides it into the Senate and the House of Representatives, becoming bicameral and more balanced in power. Similarly, the Articles of Confederation give one vote per state when it comes to congress, whereas the Constitution is more specific and ordered, giving us one vote per Representative or Senator.

The Constitution not only defines the structure and powers of government federal but also contains provisions general statements about state governments. In turn, each state has its own constitution in which the provisions applicable to governments premises within the entity. These last they can be city governments, counties, towns, school districts and districts with special purposes, and govern issues such as resources natural or transport networks of the location.