In the study of philosophy, Metaphysics (Ontology) and Epistemology are probably the two most broad and complex branches or terms one may come across. The correlation between epistemology and metaphysics is based on the understanding that epistemology justifies what otherwise would be "correctable" knowledge, that moves concepts into reality. Without epistemology, nothing in metaphysical study would have any sort of authority or weight and this is significant because metaphysical beliefs or concepts cannot depend on traditional scientific methods to be proven true. In my opinion in the context of education, both models and theories are closely intertwined subjects that cannot be completely differentiated as one being more important than the …show more content…
It is in essence the study of all things not in the physical realm. Physical study is conducted through various sciences but in the context of philosophy, it investigates why things exist and uses various ideas to explain the realities people experience. The word metaphysics itself is derived from the Greek words ‘meta’ which means after and ‘ta Phu sika’ which means ‘physics’. The word ontology is derived from the Greek words ‘ontos’ which means ‘being’ and logos’ which means study or the suffix ‘–ology’ which means ‘study of’.
There are four known subsets of metaphysical questions namely:
• Cosmology-which is the study of theories about the origin, nature and development of the universe with questions such as “How did the world
…show more content…
However variations in metaphysical beliefs have led to different approaches and systems of education hence the reason why so many private Christian and other religious schools exist today. In particular the anthropological aspect of metaphysics is in this context, is especially important to educators of all persuasions because of the ability to mold imperfect human minds at varying impressionable stages of their lives.
Epistemology is also derived from the Greek word ‘episteme’ meaning knowledge and ‘logos’ which means study or the suffix ‘–ology’ which means ‘study of’. It is that branch of philosophy that focuses at discovering the true meaning of knowledge, how that knowledge is acquired and human knowledge limitations sources and characteristics, simply put, “how do you know what is true?” It is one thing to believe something but quite another to feel justified in believing that something is true.
Epistemology is divided into two parts
With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, we begin by examining the question “What do we mean when we say we know something?” What exactly is knowledge? We will begin with a presentation that introduces the traditional definition of knowledge. Wood then discusses some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then presents an approach to epistemology that focuses on obtaining the intellectual virtues, a point we will elaborate on in the next lesson.
Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order to determine how these schools determine the source of knowledge. The distinguishing factor that determines the perspective on the foundation of knowledge is the concept of the divine.
Metaphysics deals with the nature of reality, it asks the question, “What is really real?” Knight describes an example about how the floor is not really the floor in order for the reader to understand that reality is not as simple as it may seem. These types of questions may cause your head to spin. Metaphysics goes beyond the surface, dives deep into our minds to question what we actually believe. “Metaphysics” translated means beyond physics, which is very suiting. Metaphysics is important and relevant in education because it makes students go beyond the simple facts, it makes students think critically. Essentially it asks students four questions, “How did the universe come into existence?” Is there a God and what powers all exist?” “What
Most people form many of their friendships at school, but even outside of friends, individuals’ education alters their mentalities. Without a doubt, actions like conquering challenging subject matter and overcoming academic struggles cause some parts of this educational effect, but one’s teachers have some of the greatest influence in education. The instructor teaches with a personal worldview, one which will incidentally impact the students. For example, some private schools teach the religion of Christianity, where a living God designed the universe, while public schools are required to teach the religion of evolution, where everything exists due to a chance clash of lifeless chemicals. This disparity in beliefs about the universe’s origin fosters strongly opposing ideas about topics such as morals and the meaning of life that are fundamental to how a person decides to handle any given situation. The teacher can also inspire a growth or a fixed mindset in students. Psychology professor Carol Dweck invented this idea of
(p. 16). The author points out that regardless of the discipline being discussed, everyone formulates their belief system based on their own particular worldview.
Metaphysics is usually taken to involve both questions of what is existence and what types of things exist; in order to answer either questions, one will find itself using and investigating the concepts of being. Aristotle proposed the first of these investigations which he called ‘first philosophy’, also known as ‘the science of being’ however overtime his writings came to be best known as ‘Metaphysics’ in which he studied being qua being with a central theme of how substance may be defined as a category of being. Kant who is a nominalist criticized both Aristotelian and therefore
The conflict between science and religion has always been existed. In many religious institutions, especially Muslim and Jewish, belief in Darwinism or other scientific theories is forbidden (Ferngren, 2002). Therefore, scientific studies in faith schools subsequently differ from normal school one’s. For example, Dawkins (2006) argues that faith schools tend only to teach children in a religious way, avoiding such important curriculums such as science and humanism. Similarly, Cush(2005) states that faith schools provide limited choice of scientific and sociological subjects. The knowledge of science basics is compulsory for every decent citizen in the age of new technologies and scientific humanity progress.
Chapters three, four, five and six of World Views by Ninian Smart speaks to the duality of religion in the dimensions of experimental, mystic, doctrinal and ethical. In the realm of experimental she uses two examples. One being the Roman Catholic Church and the other being the Buddhist religion. Throughout this essay I will use these two examples while addressing the experimental, mystic, doctrinal and ethical dimensions.
Metaphysics, Morals, Social, and the Political philosophy's are four major philosophical areas of inquiry. Learning about the historical development of each school of thought, who the main contributors were, and what the primary issues are in each field. Increases the knowledge and understanding of the culture and its philosophy.
Knowledge is “thinking and critical reflection, rather than reliance on the way things appear to us” (Internet Encyclopedia, n.d., para.
The metaphysical world is not something to simply be dabbled with. It is not a path whose beginning should be inspired by something frivolous, plastic, or shallow. To some, it may seem enticing enough to simply use for whatever gain they wish to achieve and then throw it away. To others, it may be an opportunity to show off and prove that they are vastly superior to their peers. However, everything comes at a price, even if that price is not currently visible, realized, or paid. Highly unpleasant consequences will always propagate along the path of life as a result of metaphysics being used for purposes of feeding the insatiable adversary of spiritual growth—the
Philosophy is the pursuit of knowledge or wisdom generally topic specific. Philosophers aim to answer three main questions which have become the three primary branches of technology. Metaphysics seeks to answer questions relating to being or existence. Epistemology seeks to answer questions relating to knowledge (criteria, sources, limits, ect.). The third branch of philosophy seeks to answer
Both schools, however, are equally integral to the recognition that science, magic, and religion are important facets of human society and development, and provide needed explanations for human existence and the occurrence of worldly events. Though science and technology have become important factors in human evolution, it is arguable that magic and religion will continue to remain an integral part of human lives despite the advances of science—for humans will always be looking for ways to explain the unexplainable; to take control of destiny, and to ease the fear of the
The question whether advancements in science and technology make the religious explanations of reality is one of the big question and has triggered heated discussions and debates (Tremlin, 2012). I support the great work of world’s top higher learning institutions and universities in the fields such as theoretical cosmology, physics, cognitive science, evolutionary biology and social science that relate to forgiveness, love, purpose, creativity, nature and origin of religious beliefs. I encourage the informed and open-minded discussion between theologians and scientists as they relate themselves to the most profound issues their specific discipline. And in a more particular way I seek to motivate fresh thinking about the creation of wealth and developing the world, programs that are aimed at cultivation talents of the gifted, and character education in Universities and schools. In this paper, I will explain why the primitive theories still hold despite the advancements in technology.
In this week’s literature synthesis the aim is to discuss the different possible views of a scientist about the nature of reality. In addition to the debate about quantitative and qualitative research should be examined, particularly in regards of rigour and relevance. Finally, the usefulness of management research approaches will be observed. The influence of politics and ethics should be also considered in this essay.