In the beginning of the novel Something Wicked, Horatio, Mac, and Wallace fit into society. They act like good friends to each other and do activities together such as bungie jumping. Before they begin their trip to the Highland Games mountain, the three decide to go receive palm readings from a psychic. The women tells Mac that he will become king of the mountain, but Wallace will own it. Ever since Mac received that reading, he has unleashed a side that he has never shown to anyone. When Mac was told he would be king of the mountain, he truly believed in this "prophecy." In doing so, he decided to take the initiative no matter what the case was. For example, he decided to damage Bank's bagpipes. It was Bank's only opportunity to get a college scholarship. However, according to Horatio, "Mac got it into his that he was going to be the king of the mountain but that you [Banks] were going to own it. He figured the only way that it was going to happen was if you went to college and made enough money to buy it, so he paid the Hell's Pipers (A gang) to bollocks your bagpipes." In other words, Mac was trying to ensure no one but …show more content…
In doing so, he acts extremely different in public, as if he was a show off and did not want anyone to get in his way. According to Horatio, "Its been like something is taking hold of him. Some kind of monster has awakened. Every single thing he's done from that moment on has been cold and communicating, and he's not going to let anyone stand in his way." Even if it means betraying his cousin Wallace and his best friend Horatio. Throughout the novel, he lies to Horatio about everything he committed: the murders and the sabotaging. In the end, Horatio feels betrayed that a person "he knew, had grown up with, and was friend with at school" would murder Duncan MacRae and Megan
It is evident that there are still a number of falsehoods that contribute to the adversity many people of color have to overcome in this country. Yale Law School professor, Harlon L. Dalton and Sociologists Naomi Gerstal and Natalia Sarkisian dissect two such falsehoods in their respective essays. In his essay, “Horatio Alger” Dalton takes on the rags-to-riches myth commonly portrayed in Horatio Alger’s works of fiction. Likewise, Gerstal and Sarkisian’s study on Black, White, and Latino families reveals data that debunks the widely held belief that families of color are weaker and more disorganized than their white counterparts. While both essays examine myths that negatively affect Black and Latino people, the authors often use different
The coming of age phase in a young person’s life is a transitional phase which prompts the idea of individualism, decision making, acceptance, moral challenges, disappointment, and individual needs. These years are essential for the overall learning and growing-up part of someone’s life. Coming of age characteristics transpired in the novel The Catcher in the Rye and The Absolutely True Diary of a part-time Indian pertain to, but do not exclude, the acceptance of the complexities and “grayness” of the world, confrontation with the adult world, and the individual needs and desires vs. external pressures/expectations/norms. In both novels, young boys are faced with tough choices that will later help them in the overall transition from
In the article, “The Death of Horatio Alger,” Paul Krugman explains that upward mobility in the United States is becoming a more difficult of a challenge. As the wealthy class continues to put a disruption on the minority group of untalented and untaught children, the U.S. economy is suffering the injustice of the education system not being able to bring forth the full potential of these unprivileged. But there was a time where upward mobility was a genuine experience. Statistics show that in 1978, adult men of fathers who were in the bottom 25 percent category managed to break through into the top 25 percent. Now in modern economy, previous generations of upward mobility is being highly affected and is dramatically faltering. Krugman states,
In “The Catcher in the Rye” by J.D Salinger, Holden Caulfield, a 16-year-old boy who has recently expelled from school, had lost his younger brother to Leukemia and witnessed the suicide of one of his peers, struggles in his journey of coming of age. He isn’t fond of the idea of having to mature and be exposed to responsibilities and problems of the real world. As a result, he tries to preserve the innocence of his younger sister, Phoebe. One way in which he aims to accomplish this goal is through a Little Shirley Beans record which he buys in hopes of giving it to Phoebe. Salinger utilizes the symbol of the broken record to develop Holden’s loss of innocence and deteriorating character.
In the first chapter of this novel, we get introduced to the protagonist and narrator of the novel, Holden Caufield, from a rest home in which he has been sent for therapy. He refuses to talk about his early life, although he does explain that his older brother “D.B” sold out to writing for Hollywood. His story and breakdown begins in the school of Pencey Prep, a boarding school set in Pennsylvania. The setting for the early chapters in the narration is his "terrible" school, to which he describes the atmosphere to be “as cold as the December air on Thomsen Hill”. Holden’s student career at Pencey Prep has been destroyed by his refusal to apply himself. We know this after Holden explains he failed four of his five subjects, passing only English. Due to his lack of effort and determination, he was forbidden to return to the school after the term. The Saturday before Christmas vacation began, Holden overlooked the football field, where Pencey usually
Hamlet proves himself a temperamental, twisted character in William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet. The Prince of Denmark conveys his facetious demeanor with his behavior and sharp tongue, especially in scenes with Ophelia and Gertrude. Although Hamlet’s situation is difficult and easily sympathized by viewers, his aggression should ultimately be focused on his murderous uncle.
The relationship that Hamlet has with Horatio is one of trust where Hamlet acts normal. Hamlet says, "I must be idle." (III. ii. 85.) This quote shows Hamlet telling Horatio that he is going to pretend to be insane. He tells Horatio about watching Claudius for signs of guilt and says, "Give him heedful note, for I mine eyes will rivet his face, and, after, we will both our judgments join in censure of his seeming (3.2.87)." A crazy person will
American literature is full of classic novels containing heroic protagonists; Holden Caulfield of The Catcher in the Rye is not one of these classic heroes. The article Some Crazy Cliff by Arthur Heiserman and James E. Miller Jr. provides one interpretation of the novel suggesting that the protagonist is unique compared to others commonly found in American literature; most heroes are seeking acceptance while Holden is seeking something within the society he is trying to leave. The novel follows Holden Caulfield, a young boy who recently flunked out of high school, over the course of three days. During this time, the protagonist returns to New York via train, but does not want to be with his parents until they have already learned of his
Horatio plays the informant of the play; he clues everyone in onto what is happening in the play and whom the true victim of the play is, Hamlet. If it were not for Horatio believing Hamlet, there would be serious doubt to the sanity of Hamlet. In Horatio seeing the ghost along with Hamlet it gives cause to not doubt the sanity of the Prince who could be seen to be in a state insanity because of the disbelief and anger that his father just died, his uncle married his mother, and that his uncle stole his crown. Horatio brings the reality and truth to the audience so they understand and believe in what he thinks and believes. Hamlet even says that he admires the honesty and truthfulness of Horatio. "Horatio, thou art e'en as just a man/As e'er my conversation cop'd withal" (Act III, scene ii, ln. 55-56). Perhaps it is also his uniqueness that brings along the feeling of trustworthiness in Horatio. He has the ability to associate himself among commoners because he is a commoner himself, yet he can also associate himself among royalty because he is Hamlet’s trusted friend, intelligent, just, and is loyal to all of his
In the beginning he was wrestling with how to feel that his ambitions and dark thoughts were acceptable and soon used fate as an appropriate excuse to murder the good king Duncan. That it was fate, his destiny, was the one that wanted him to become king and nothing was of his own fault.
This leads to their death in most cases; the only truly honest figure in the whole play is Horatio, he always tells the truth and in fact he is the only one surviving in the end.
Macduff is also a character that deals with guilt. He is guilty of leaving his entire family behind in Scotland which is eventually why they are killed. He uses this guilt to drive him to bring Macbeth down. If Macduff would have thought to bring his wife and children they wouldn't have died. This shows that every action has consequences and those consequences must be taken into consideration.
Of Horatio we know best that what distinguishes him from Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, and indeed from Polonius, Ophelia, Laertes, and Gertrude, is that Claudius cannot use him. Critics have remarked upon Horatio’s ambiguously shifting status at the court of Denmark, and the late William Empson confessed a certain irritation at Hamlet’s discovery of virtues in Horatio that the prince could not find in himself. Yet Shakespeare gives us a Hamlet we must love while knowing our inferiority, since he has the qualities we lack, and so he also gives us Horatio, our representative, who loves so stoically for the rest of us. Horatio is loyal, and limited; skeptical as befits a fellow student of the profoundly skeptical Hamlet, yet never skeptical about Hamlet. Take Horatio out of the play, and you take us out of the play. The plot could be rearranged to spare the wretched Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, even to spare Laertes, let alone Fortinbras, but remove Horatio, and Hamlet becomes so estranged from us that we scarcely can hope to account for that universality of appeal which is his, and the play’s, most original characteristic. (5)
The Catcher in the Rye is a novel written by J.D. Salinger that occurs around the 1950s. The story’s protagonist and narrator is Holden Caulfield, a seventeen year old white male, who journeys to various places as he mourns over the death of his little brother, Allie. As a white male in a capitalist society, he has tremendous amounts of privileges that allow him to get. However, as the novel progresses, Holden describes his society as a place where honored human qualities are suppressed and capitalist ideals are embraced. Throughout the novel, we see that capitalism, “the social system based on the recognition of individual rights, including property rights, in which all property is privately owned”, destroys the overall society for Holden and his generation (Rand).
“To be, or not to be, that is the question,” (3.1.64). This famous line in William Shakespeare's Hamlet perfectly encapsulates Hamlet’s internal struggle throughout the play. Hamlet tells the story of the young prince of Denmark and his desire for revenge on the uncle, Claudius, who murdered his father. As is the case in many works of literature, Hamlet changes greatly throughout the play. However, because of his attempts to act insane, it can be difficult to precisely map the changes in Hamlet’s character. By carefully investigating his seven soliloquies, where he is alone and has no need to “put on an antic disposition,” one can understand and interpret how Hamlet’s character develops throughout the play.