Stem Cell Research Cons

Embryonic stem cell research is a highly debated and sensitive topic.  There is a lot of good that can come from researching this technology of stem cell research because many people all across the globe would benefit from it.  The United States will soon fall short while other countries are already using this advancement if we cannot come to a logical conclusion on this vital issue.

Stem cell research has been quite a controversial topic since its origin in the 1960s by Gopal Das and Joseph Altman. Of course, anything that uses a human embryo would be. Stem cell research could open a vast number of new doors for modern science, it could let us test new drugs, one of which could be the unfound cure for AIDS or Alzheimer’s disease. However, this branch of science comes at a high price, the price of a human life that is only five to six days

“How can the use of stem cells be so controversial?”, one may ask. If the stem cells are donated out of free will or were going to be destroyed anyway, how can putting them to better use be controversial? Sure, a potential life must be destroyed to save a life, but only before one can tell that it is a human. Should the use of stem cells for medical research and use be regulated? These questions and more will be discussed and pondered throughout this paper.

Embryonic stem cell research and use is a scientific advancement that could change medical history. There are two types of stem cell research, adult stem cells, and embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells receive a very negative connotation in society, and there are many misconceptions about the process and the ethics of embryonic stem cell research. A large majority of society immediately assume that it is the use of aborted embryos because of the word embryonic, and adult stem cells are not as effective as embryonic. However, this is not the case. Embryonic stem cell research is in progress to help cure and reduce the effects of very fatal and harmful diseases that take many of societies precious lives. If research continues to

Scientists have generally agreed that stem cells are vital to the science and medical field for they may be the solution to treat and even cure several serious medical conditions. However, not all the types of the stem cell research is widely accepted. For instance, the Embryonic Stem Cell Research, which in recent years has been largely debated in the United States. This is due to the two major arguments following this research. One, embryonic stem cell research is necessary to unravel the possibility of improving human life. Two, embryonic stem cell research involves the abortion of potential human life. It is a debate whether the life of an individual suffering from a fatal illness or injury is more priceless, or the life of a human at one

“Now science has presented us with a hope called stem cell research, which may provide our scientists with many answers that have for so long been beyond our grasp.” (Nancy Reagan). Most cells within our bodies perform one specialized task. Contrary to these single job cells are stem cells. These cells are unspecialized and can morph and perform any task that is needed within the body. However, the way that stem cells are harvested has caused a lot of controversy. The way that the stem cells are taken destroys the embryo. We should support the recent decision to allow embryonic stem-cell research in the United States and federally fund the work to use these stem cells to cure diseases. Better stem cell research would provide safer procedures and medical practices for everyone.

Stem cell research and use is good because it can cure over 56 diseases that could be deadly. Also it can replace damaged cells, it can even cure blind people's eyes. Then there is always a dna match so it will always work. Finally it is able to treat treatments faster that normal drugs and medicine such as parkinson disease.

Did you know that there are people who decides the fate of the future? Who gives human beings the right to play God? To decide who lives and who dies. There comes a time where we have to ask ourselves, how much of our lives will we let the government control? Embryonic stem cell research should be discontinued because our future is being decided by regular humans who make several mistakes.

Embryonic Stem Cell Research are pluripotent stem cells derived from the inner cell mass of a blastocyst. I believe that the use of Embryonic Stem Research is beneficial to society because these cells have unlimited potential. They can allow permanent repair to failing organs by injecting healthy cells into the damaged organ. They also can used for finding and preventing cures for cancers, Parkinson’s disease, birth defects, spinal cord injuries, and strokes. However, Stem Cell Research is a controversial topic, especially when referring to Embryonic Stem Cell Research.

A recent controversial topic in the past 15 years, has been on the research of Stem Cells and whether it’s ethically right or if it’s needed in our society to better global health. However stem research should in fact continue to be funded and supported because its benefits are a necessity for the future of human civilization and outweigh the other side of the argument on the issue.

In recent years there has been lots of studying and scientific research regarding stem cells. Now there are people who wish to more widely implement it. I am arguing that stem cell research should be limited by the government because in many cases it is unethical and potentially dangerous. I will prove this by showing all of the ethical and moral standpoints, also the potential dangers with experimentation on humans.

Ever since the early days of human civilization , well-being has been the most fundamental aspect and people have always been searching for a healthy lifestyle. Due to the discovery of new medical progress, humans become healthier and their life expectancy tends to increase. Among these breakthroughs, stem cell research, which is relatively new, turns out to be useful in finding ways for a better and longer human life. The development of such technology could yield many significant medical potentials and highly productive results. However, there have been numerous arguments, posing the stem cell research. Despite its rapid success, many people did not want this process to continue for the variety of reasons. This essay, however, will argue that stem cell research should be maintained, in order that there can be further improvement in medical and scientific discovery. It will do so by investigating the issues, that are connected with the research, mainly focusing on utility, cost-efficiency and views of the society.

world free of agonizing disease and debilitating disabilities is what stem cell research promises. Although, a relatively new method, stem cell research promises endless possibilities for scientific advancement. These advancements in turn have the potential to revolutionize the way future diseases are treated, even eliminating the diseases for good. Despite all the upsides, stem cell research has some controversial downsides that come with it. Stem-cell research has endless possibilities in terms of curing diseases, however it also raises an ethical issue in terms of acquiring the stem-cells.

Ethical Issues in Stem Cell Research and Therapy helps my research in the way that I can use it to branch off my main sources/topics by giving insight on the political side of stem cell research. This source targets the ethical side of stem cell research which is a crucial topic for my introduction of my essay.

It has been taken to account that the controversial topic of therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all animals and humans is being debated on whether to vote for or against stem cell research. Based on what was researched on you; you yourself is having a hard time with this topic. If you don’t mind, I would like to give you my perspective on the topic. Hopefully you will consider what I am about to say ,when it comes to finding your conclusion on stem cell research.