(An analysis of the use of stoicism in Marcus Aurelius's, “Meditations”) Stoicism is defined in Greek school of Philosophy as teaching that “virtue, the highest good, is based on knowledge, and that the wise live in harmony with divine reason that governs nature, and are indifferent to the vicissitudes of fortune and to pleasure and pain.” (Oxford). Virtue is a trait sought after by many in today’s society. It is also a trait that millions upon millions of people choose to ignore. It all depends on what is important or unimportant to that particular person. To have virtue is an honor, and something that one cannot give to another. Those that are wise know that virtue, or justice, is an essential characteristic to have in…show more content…
Naturally, horrible and crude things might happen to certain people. These things should be expected and even anticipated. Nonetheless, the world goes about in its own way, and men must reciprocate this natural idea. Men are more than capable of knowing the difference between an action that is just and one that is unjust.
Individual freedom and control is also given very much emphasis in regards to stoicism in Marcus Aurelius’s, “Meditations”. This idea is self-explanatory; men have control over themselves and have the power to direct their thoughts and views. “You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.” (Meditations). As men are able to control their own thoughts, they can start focusing in on things that truly matter. They can focus on more virtuous things. Philosophers have learned to control their minds and see truths that others in the world are hidden from. If these philosophers can find a way to share this information with as many people as possible, then they will have achieved their ultimate goal. These philosophers are usually the ones to be leaders of a nation. They are chosen to lead because of their understanding of how to help everybody live together in harmony and unity. As strong philosophers develop sturdy governments, it is difficult not to see how these fundamental principles are so foundational for success. Marcus Aurelius is spot on in stating that
- Decent Essays
Influences Of Plato's Republic, Plato, And Marcus Aurelius
- 1041 Words
- 5 Pages
and standard for others. The well known, Machiavelli, Plato, and Marcus Aurelius have varying opinions of what a leader should be. Only one view of a leader that I can agree with correlates with the voice of Aurelius most. Despite this, I must admit that Machiavelli's and Plato’s writings of the Prince and Republic offers a few point that can be validated. The writings of Plato’s Republic, Machiavelli’s Prince, and Aurelius’s Meditations all contain a visions of a leader, but the descriptions of Aurelius
- 1041 Words
- 5 Pages
Decent Essays - Decent Essays
Marcus Aurelius Essay
- 832 Words
- 4 Pages
Marcus Aurelius was born on April 20, 121 AD into a family of royalty. His uncle and adoptive father, Antoninus Pius, was the emperor of Rome. Aurelius, too, was trained from birth to be a great ruler like his father. At age eleven, he dedicated himself to religion, although he considered philosophy to be the "true, inward" religion, one which did not require ceremonies necessary in others. He was appointed by Emperor Hadrian to priesthood in 129. The Emperor also supervised his education
- 832 Words
- 4 Pages
Decent Essays - Best Essays
Exploration of the Political Structure of the Roman Empire
- 4418 Words
- 18 Pages
Exploration of the Political Structure of the Roman Empire The public sphere of Rome, which included religious norms, social settings, as well as some other cultural divides, has been known to greatly affect the Roman political system throughout, from its inception to its fall. Our world has seen many great empires and perhaps the most popular one by name is the Roman Empire. A great number of books have been written on this subject, many movies have been made, and the Roman Empire remains rich
- 4418 Words
- 18 Pages
Best Essays