Sugary drinks should be taxed. By adding taxes, it decreases the risks of health problems. Buyers of sugary drinks might also drink healthier. Nobody would get bad habits either. Our country would be better off with taxed sugary drinks.
One reason sugary drinks should be taxed is it decreases the high risks of health problems. Critics argue that people are in charge of what they drink. While that may be true, the government tries to keep others from being unhealthy for their own good. There would be less risks of childhood obesity, type 2 diabetes, and much more. Dr. Jeff Ritterman, a cardiologist, said, “ Solid foods produce satiety. You get full. You get full when you eat a piece of cake. You don’t get full when you drink the soda, even
…show more content…
Less money would be spent on sugary drinks when there are taxes. No one wants to pay more money just on drinks. While some people might think they could get a diet drink, it is also very unhealthy. An example of this is the “Proposition E”. The “Proposition E” is a tax that would have provided money for health, nutrition, and physical education programs. This tax was not accepted by the people in San Francisco. In addition, taxes reduce the consumption of soda (the liver cannot handle that much fructose). Beverage makers would be encouraged by the taxes to create new drinks that have only a little bit of sugar. For kids, they could get use to being more healthy.
The last reason is adding taxes helps people get rid of (or not start) bad habits. Addiction to sugary drinks would be prevented. Also, hyperness because of sugary drinks could be stopped. This implies that the higher the taxes are, the lower the chances of being hyper are. School lunches could improve and become more healthy. In addition, people would be at least a bit healthier because of the taxation. There would be one less unhealthy kind of drink/food in the state(s).
Taxes should be put on sugary drinks. The percentage of people getting health problems would diminish. More people would drink healthier choices. Bad habits could also end, because of the high sugar amounts. Sometimes taxes can be considered terrible, but other times, they are for your own
Consumers think that it is awful that they have to pay for someone else’s health care while that person may just as well be drinking twelve cans of soda daily and continually destroying their health. (“Should there be a”, n.d.) These consumers are hoping the soda tax will encourage people to stop abusing soda and at the same time lowering the obesity rate in our country, which now about 66% of our population. Some commenters also said that the government is doing the right thing to try and stop this
Sugar addiction is a problem that has been in our society for many years. In today's world this type of addiction is being composed into drinks. Sugary drinks are found everywhere from local stores, to in home refrigerators. Sodas, juices, and energy drinks, all fall under unhealthy remedies to thirst. Sugar addiction can only restrain us from accomplishing healthy goals in life. Sugary drinks can lead to harming one's body. Over the past few years, many cities and states have considered taxing sodas and other sugary beverages. Sugary drinks must be tax due to its unhealthy components and addiction.
“Soda Taxes: Gaining Steam or Getting Steamrolled?” is an enticing article by Anna Gorman that focuses on the issue of taxing sugary beverages and the effect it will ultimately have on the health of the general population. She mentions that the tax could reduce the rates of obesity and diabetes in the affected areas. She also points out the counter to this claim, that soda taxes may not have any effect on obesity rates at all and may give the government too much power over the consumer choice. Overall, she seems to advocate that soda is an unhealthy beverage and should be cut down among consumers. Soda however, is not the only unhealthy options out there. There is a plethora of products on the shelves of supermarkets and sold at restaurants.
The debate on weather sugary drinks, especially soda, should be taxed or not has been a topic for years. Some people believe that they should be taxed for the improvement of health while on the other hand some people think that taxing the drinks won't do much and actually hurt people. Taxing sugary drinks is helpful to those who have a hard time with temptation for the drinks. In the article "Do Soda Taxes Really Work?" Sifferlin states that when researchers looked at Berkeley residents, they found that when taxing soda started "sales of sugary-sweetened drinks fell by close 10% and sales of water increased in Berkeley by about 16%" (4) Just by the percent difference rasing prices on soda made people decide against buying the sweet drinks,
This however, is not what people believe to be the true reason behind the taxes given that politicians can sometime have the proclivity to lie or not be completely honest with citizens. It seems as if the people behind these taxes, who promote them to be a cause of lowering the rate of obese and diabetics, are using this view of helping out the citizens as an excuse to look good in enforcing the tax. Kelly Brownell and William Shughart further support the idea that the taxes are the politicians providing the public with the brightest points from the taxes by saying, "Citizens do not normally expect politicians to be truthful. If they want to impose these taxes, they should be honest enough to admit that they will not end obesity and diabetes, but rather will generate more of other people's money for state government to spend." (8). With this, Brownell describes the taxing as being used for government spending, and people don't trust the political imagery of it being prompted to stop obesity. The reality could be that the taxes will be used as money for the governments, but the politicians are insulting citizens by saying it will stop obesity when it really
To begin with, these sugar regulations would need to set a limited on the amount of sugar allowed in these products. Otherwise, people will continue to consume more and more sugar. Right now, it is a fact that “Each 12-ounce serving of soda a person consumes each day raised type 2 diabetes risk by 10 to 15 percent, and many Americans are consuming
Firstly, taxes on sodas would decrease the consumption of soda. People would think twice before buying a soft drink if there was an increased tax on carbonated beverages. They may choose bottles of water with a cheaper price. When people don’t spend on carbonated beverages, the consumption of soda would decrease. According to a survey of Powell et at., suggested that a 20% increase in price would reduce consumption by 25%. As a result, it would break the link between the consumption of soda and obesity. It also encourages the consumption of healthier beverages, such as water, vegetable drinks, etc. If people consume fewer sodas, in particular, they would have better health conditions as well as lower obesity rate. Therefore, these taxes would decrease the obesity rate in our country.
Sugar tax will not help to solve health or budget issues to reduce debt. Sugar has caused many problems such as revenue and health problems. Firstly, sugar drinks has a high cost on the society, and the overconsumption of sugar causes lots of health problems such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, tooth decay and heart diseases “Already we know that the burden of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases are greater among population of socioeconomic status “ (Riediger,year, para 14). Sugar is addiction and it mainly affects to people who have low incomes , not because they can’t buy , but they don’t have enough knowledge on how it might affect them back since they have a low literacy even though, dozen of cities and states have launched public
You were about to about to buy some Coca-Cola but then found out that it is taxed. Do you think it is fair? I certainly do think it is fair. I have three reasons for it. These three reasons are they encourage people to drink water instead of soda, it helps people have a healthy and strong body, and even though some might say it doesn’t make any progress, doesn’t mean it really is true.
Eating unhealthy foods is one of the major causes of obesity today; but should there be a higher tax on all soft drinks and junk food? Should people be punished for eating what they want? Yes, there are health risks involved with an unhealthy diet but is a higher taxing on these foods the right alternative? With the price of healthcare raising maybe the extra tax could help alleviate it, maybe not. Perhaps the higher tax will turn people away from buying unhealthy foods and drinks. Consuming unwholesome food can lead to clogged arteries, heart attacks and many other fatal illnesses. Buying the healthier substitute may help our
With a growing epidemic of obesity in America, some states and lawmakers have resorted to taking unconventional measures in order to counter the growing issue. Many legislators are debating the effectiveness of a “fat tax” would be on limiting the consumption of soda, high fat foods, and high sugar foods, and ultimately reducing the rate of morbidity and mortality due to obesity. The idea is that long term consumption of high fat, high sugar foods and drinks lead to many health problems, so making them more expensive and less accessible should decrease the health issues related to their consumption.
The New Zealand government should have a tax to regulate the consumption of sugary drinks or foods, because this leads to decrease issues of people 's health and it would be heartening healthy conducts.
Putting taxes, age limits, and also limiting the availability of sugar can be possible solutions to help regulate. These resolutions could make a huge difference in the general public. Lustig suggests that the government should limit availability of sugar in vending machines and set an age limit for foods and drinks with an excessive amount of sugar (Doheny,WEBMD). If this was to happen it could keep our adults and children of the nation more healthy, and communicable and noncommunicable diseases would become less common. Having taxes on soft drinks and other things with a high count of sugar, may limit the amount of sugar intake (Johnson, BBC NEWS).
Paying taxes is something everyone does. We pay taxes on cars, property, and on our income. What about the junk food we consume? This has been debated for years that it will or will not work. How do we educate the public? Why should we do it? Where will the money be going? What groups will it serve? Prices are already high, so where is the money coming from? Everything that is done must be motivated because if not, it becomes a fad - here today and gone tomorrow. Only things that are done repetitively are made into habits. As a person, all things can be done if we have a desire and a need. Taxes on junk food and soda will not work unless everyone is educated on the utilization of revenues, health advantages, and motivated sufficiently to make a more healthy change.
Considering that soft drinks are one of the most popular drinks to a lot of people all around the world, unfortunately, a lot of them love to drink it almost every day and may not live without it. Soda becomes addictive, preventing one from drinking what the body needs the most which is water. In the market, there is a infinite amount of choices with multiple varieties of flavors, different tastes, ranges from classic soda to diet soda. However, consumers do not recognize clearly the negative effect of soft drinks that have a high chance of eroding their health away. Some of these examples include dental erosion, energy intake, obesity and other health issues. Nowadays, people live a healthy life to avoid health problems, so taxes on soft