Gallop's essay is certainly a very interesting piece, and her thesis is very plainly stated. A direct quote from Gallop manages to sum it up very efficiently: “Close reading can thus be a crucial part of our education, the very sort of thing we most need from college. Close reading can equip us to learn, to be open to learning, to keep on learning all our life.” (Gallop, 11) In “The Ethics of Reading: Close Encounters”, Gallop is attempting to convey to her readership that the technique of 'close reading', which she expounds on in great detail throughout the essay, is a form of reading which emphasizes focusing on details, and allegedly offers both a superior understanding of text and empathy with the authors of those texts. Though she may have cautioned her readers away from developing tunnel vision on the main idea of a written piece, Gallop chose to include the phrase 'close reading' forty-eight times in her paper; the level of emphasis she places on close reading makes it harder not to see the main idea of her essay. …show more content…
However, there were several other clues: her constant promotion of the idea of close reading, her long-winded explanations of the purported benefits that close reading offers, and her expanded discussion on the repercussions of choosing to educate students in close reading. This, combined with the nigh excessive use of the term 'close reading' made her thesis appear in flamboyant prominence, which was likely an effective tool in disseminating information about the process of close reading to her audience. However, the importance of this article lies not in how effective it is in propagating the idea of close reading, but in how many of the claims regarding close reading are
In summary, the first section of the Bedford Reader assist students in writing, and reading more closely so selections were easier to understand. Also, we learn how to truly analyze an essay. The second section covers writing, and its importance in daily communication. All in all, critical reading should be done in a quiet place for it to be done most effectively.
The approach to the reading of the novel would be varied. It is anticipated that the class study would begin with a shared reading of the opening chapter to foster students' interest. A prepared reading by the teacher is usually much more involving than a hesitant reading-around-the-class activity (Sykes, n.d.). The aim is to motivate each student to read the
The purpose of this paper is to analyze Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s Journeys reading curriculum. In this paper all of the lenses that each ideology views curriculum under is examined. This paper examines how the Journeys reading curriculum views learning, knowledge, children, teaching, and evaluation. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (2014) stated “The unique close reading routine builds better readers while also providing intervention for struggling students.” This claim should make Journeys fall under the Social Efficiency ideology.
Why do pre-reading strategies that activate prior knowledge and raise interest in the subject prepare students to approach text reading in a critical frame of mind?
This student’s preferred learning strategy has always been that of the read/write category. She takes advantage of handouts, textbooks, and dictionaries when studying for quizzes and exams. She also prefers going to the library due to the atmosphere provided by this institution. To enhance learning the use of outlines and note cards have also been useful when studying. Visual aids accompanying the read/write category have been useful in obtaining good grades throughout advancement in education (VARK, 2011).
Shanahan identifies that general reading skills can only take a student so far. A student can comprehend and read a text well, however the disciplinary approach could allow them to take that even further. The example given has to deal with general summaries and how they often look similar throughout
proper for our students to read” (Hollins). There is conflict between children and their elders
1. This document teaches student how to read the word, by showing a specific point of view of the author. By sourcing it, the students can understand that the document represent the perspective of the author.
In “How Teachers Make Children Hate Reading,” “Fremont High School,” and “College Pressures,” by John Holt, Jonathan Kozol, and William Zinsser, respectively, many educational problems that were formed from as early as the 1900’s were addressed in their writings. Although the authors of these pieces touch on different, specific flaws in the school system, the authors are all making a similar statement of how schools have the potential to obstruct a student’s learning capabilities through ineffective rules and regulations which only adds pressure and stress on its students. John Holt’s main argument in “How Teachers Make Children Hate Reading” mentions how students do not have the opportunity to learn at their own pace, rather they are forced to undergo a certain style of learning. A prime example of this is how students are forced to understand everything they read - ”Every chapter was followed by close questioning and testing to make sure the students "understood. " Holt then questions if these actions are necessary in educating students.
I also provide articles and other reading material related to his studies. This is intended to provide knowledge about something that will be learned later. And according to McKenna& Stahl (2003), reading component are very importance part that are frequently assessed as part of reading instruction for placement, diagnosis, monitoring and outcome evaluation. Therefore, I will always provide reading materials in accordance with the learning session, is to ensure a more comprehensive understanding of a topic that is being taught. It is also to develop creative thinking among students, assist in the freedom to communicate ideas. the importance of supporting learners beyond being aware of their own thinking to allowing them to take greater responsibility for it, through their own target setting to enable them to manage their ‘progressive pathway towards procedural autonomy’ (Kimbell and Stables 2008: 224).
This paper seeks to compare my personal view about research reading to the views expressed by Shanahan; Sadoski in their writing. In my view, I strongly agree with the need of reading research as they aid to eradicate reading failures as educators get to know and act based on scientific evidence. It is true that students who have difficulties in reading have challenges in mastering the academic content and thereby most of them fail to succeed in academics and also fail to achieve their life potential. Partially, the blame goes to a system as the system has not stressed on the need for reading research in most of its units. It is sad to note that this was happening and worse still is that most of the teachers do not have the background or that
Close Study is an instructional routine wherein students critically examine a work through repeated encounters. The focus of these successive encounters is intentionally designed to build students’ ability to examine a work and identify key elements to build layers of meaning and use those elements to support their interpretations.
We want to create knowledge depth in students. To do this we need to have students engaging in close readings of complex texts. Moreover, our lessons need to teach students how to approach text analysis, as opposed to using question and answer drills or practice tests as test preparation.
Moreover, the case study had also outlined how Sally had performed her duty as Academic Counselor in the case of Reggie. However, it neither mention of the learning objectives why the students are required to read the 300 pages assignment nor explain further instruction in doing it so, whether it should be an original work or in the case the student had use other resources it should be properly cited. So, I had to presume that Professor Lovelit had missed a significant
There is then the serious reading undertaken for research and for satisfying one's longing for knowledge. It may be a subject of scientific significance, or a subject of historic or philosophic importance - varying according to the taste of the person. This kind of reading disciplines the mind and trains one for critical and original thinking. There is yet another kind of reading -reading for pleasure. Though serious reading is also a source of pleasure, reading which is devoted mainly to it differs in one respect. It grows upon one, it gives before demanding and it soothes and relieves tension and loneliness. The only kind of reading which neither stimulates thought nor provides knowledge is one which is approached negatively, with the simple motive of escape and of "killing" time.