Summary Of The Sooner You Believe It The Sooner We Can End It

One in six children in the United States do not know when they will get their next meal. Children who are facing hunger struggle in school, are more likely to repeat a grade, have developmental concerns and have behavioral problems. The National School Lunch Program has brought meals to millions of children from food insecure families for free or reduced rates.

In Anna Quindlen’s essay, “Schools Out For Summer”, she writes about the problems of childhood hunger and how to solve it here in America. During the summer, school ends and kids don’t get lunch everyday as if they would while it was in session. The author uses many words and ideas to convey the point she is making in the writing to persuade the reader.

Anna Quindlen’s essay “School’s Out for Summer,” is about some families that cannot afford food throughout the summer. Her essay is describing how America should be able to feed our people. She tells about food shortages and why people can’t afford it sometimes. “Food banks reported that most of their clients are minimum wage workers that who can’t afford enough to eat on their salaries”.(paragraph 8 second line) She is using evidence from a company explaining that most workers who lives on minimum wage aren’t able to afford enough food because they only make enough to pay for rent most of the time.

Ever since Obama has come into office school lunches have become healthier and more satisfying for the students of the country. The Obama administration has worked very hard to make school lunches both healthy and appealing. The, Healthy Hunger Kids Act of 2010 required the USDA to make significant nutrition improvements in school meals, as well as to improve the overall excellence of foods at schools. Proponents of the program, such as, Michelle Obama say that the 524 schools that have withdrawn amount to a drop in a bucket compared to the other 100,000 schools nationwide that are participating in the program.

“The Sooner You Believe It, the Sooner We Can End It.” Shows how Anna Quindlen feels about children who don’t get to eat during the summer, because there parents can’t afford it. But there are some programs during the summer that help feed the children. And even so still a lot of people don’t go to the program or try to use it.

- Summer Meals partners with educators and local police to take kids off the street during summertime and provide them with free food, education, and activities.

The original goal of the food lunch program was to feed malnourished school children and to help farmers by buying up some of their extra crops and commodities. This program worked well for 50 years and was a popular and accepted program. In the 1990’s the program was looked at and it was determined to look at and reinvent the school lunch program. There were many players in this reinvention and we have Helen Haas who is the head of the “food and nutrition services.” She is the lady who develops a feud with the School food service association. There are also other players in the story including, school food workers, parent and teacher groups, the farmers, dietary advocacy groups, the dairy council, meat council, and various health groups.

“Fifteen million students get free or cut-rate lunches at school, and many of them get breakfast, too.” When summer hits the lunch programs aren't available to those students who need it. This leaves them without one or even two meals a day. Families don't always have the money to send their children to camps or services that provide them with a lunch

"In the article “When There’s No School Lunch in St. Louis, food vans help fill the gap” written by Allison Colburn, the central idea was how a food van (or business) drives to different homes every day delivering free meals during the summer, Monday-Friday. In this business they will go from house to house spending from 20-30 minutes. This information is stated in the 8th paragraph, “Each van makes 11 stops Monday through Friday and spends about 20 to 30 minutes at each location.” The food van will deliver meals to children that would normally eat food at school but now that it is summer, they are not able to. My next supporting detail is, “The summer program, now in its sixth year, has grown from providing 5,000 meals in 2012, Executive

Think back; is there a school lunch that comes to mind? There may have been at least one school lunch that the lunch ladies would dish up that made a majority of the students excited to eat. Kids that routinely brought their super-hero lunch-box and thermos would leave it at home and jump in line for pizza or burgers and fries. Kids were also allowed to go back for “seconds” and for some students, it was the greatest meal of the week, including what their family served at home. The federal government has been involved in the NSLP (National School Lunch Program) since 1946, with the implementation of the National School Lunch Act. These initial programs developed the commodity distribution program for schools, institutions, needy households, summer camp, and other eligible outlets (USDA Food and Nutrition Service). Since this initial deployment, there have been various changes, the most recent being “Healthy Kids Hunger-Free Act” passed in 2010. This was an initiative of the First Lady Michelle Obama. The act was part of her plight against child obesity and also part of her “Let’s Move” action. The impact of the government controlling what is chosen for the school lunch menu has decreased student participation, increased waste, and decreased healthy eating among the students.

Verna Keesbury and Diane Willis are in charge of food operations for our K-12 school located in Montpelier, OH. Serving over 1,000 meals a day is not only challenging but rewarding to these women as well. Verna's kitchen staff starts serving meals at 10:30 a.m. and ends with the last high school lunch at 1:00 p.m. The greatest addition to Montpelier Schools' Lunch Program has been the School Dinning System Portal. Students enter their lunch number quickly and efficiently and RevTrack allows parents to track spending and eating habits. Parents are also able to pay lunch fees on-line.

The entire process of lunch program assistance is rooted in feasibility and accessibility, with the intended audience suffering as a result of political agendas. Seeking to reach some semblance of balance, the nation’s public school lunches underwent a major facelift under the Obama Administration, with Michelle Obama spearheading the movement. In an effort to improve the quality of school lunches, Mrs. Obama worked with all the major actors involved in the process from students to food distributors to formulate at a plan that would enable students to reach their full potential without fear of food insecurity. With the rise of the Industrial Revolution, families began moving to the cities enabling what was previously saved for the elite, a chance at an education for their children (Twilley, Nicola). The correlation between academic

The monies received by school districts from the government to fund the National School Lunch Program are not sufficient enough to provide the fresh and whole foods that our children need. There has recently been a revolution in the National School Lunch Program, set in place by Michelle Obama. However even with the strict new guidelines and new healthier food based programs children are still receiving highly processed foods that school districts are eligible to purchase at a reduced cost through commodities.

In the United States every child is required to attend school between the ages of six and sixteen, so every child between those ages will have lunch at school. School lunches can be purchased by students or brought by the students from home, however we have what is called the National School Lunch Program (NSLP). This program serves to offer free and reduced lunches to students living in poverty. Children of families with incomes at or below 130 percent of the poverty line are eligible for free meals and those with incomes between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty line are eligible for reduced-price meals; over 31 million children were served by this program each school day in 2012 (Food and Nutrition Service). Trying to make sure

Children living in poverty are offered a wide range of resources in regards to malnutrition. Quindlen specifies, “15 million students get free or cut-rate lunches at school, and many of them get breakfast, too” (School’s out for Summer). Young children that receive good, balanced, nutritional meals are more likely to attend school as well as have better study habits than those that don’t receive the necessary nourishment. For the most part, in communities that can afford to give poverty stricken families free or reduced lunch there is almost always an option for children to get fed during the week at school. Another reliable resource that many elementary schools offer is free lunches for students as well as their families during the summer to ensure that children eat at least once a day while school is out. Walczak stresses, “in an area where many students receive free or reduced-price school lunches, providing a solution for lunch during the summer is essential to the children’s well-being” (No School Shouldn’t). All teachers/school officials should try to encourage children living in poor situations to always eat when they can, because it encourages good performance in school. Although nutrition is very important for a young child to maintain having good hygiene is imperative to success in students as well.