preview

Summary: The Canadian Health Care System

Decent Essays

The disproportionate, poor health outcomes experienced by First Nations Canadians have been attributed to an uncoordinated and fragmented health care system. This system is rooted in colonial legislation and social policies that have created jurisdictional ambiguity and long-standing confusion among federal, provincial and First Nations governments as to who is responsible for First Nations health care (Kelly, 2011; Lavoie, 2013). The responsibility of healthcare resembles a “political football and while it is being passed back and forth, the health status of First Nations people remains the lowest of any segment of the population (Cook, 2011, p. 40). Despite attempts over the last 40 years to address this pressing social issue, the absence …show more content…

The federal government is responsible for the delivery of primary health care services on-reserve as well as for funding the province for programs and services (Lavoie, 2013). Conversely, the province is responsible for primary health care services off-reserve, as well as hospital and physician services. While these jurisdictional boundaries seem to be clear in theory, in practice, they have been proven to be ambiguous and complex, and at times even self-serving (Lavoie, 2013; Kelly, 2011). This has contributed in an alarming burden of illness among First Nations communities that have economic, political and social implications for all Canadians. A study of these ambiguities and complexities as well as their consequences first requires a scan of the historical policies that have led to the current state of affairs in the healthcare of First Nations people.
As policies of assimilation, the British North America Act, the Indian Act and the White and Red Papers are foundational documents that guide the understanding of the Indian Health Policy and its implications. The starting point for a discussion on healthcare jurisdiction is the British North America Act (1867). It …show more content…

While at face value it generally implies the importance of collaboration, community self-governance and clarity of responsibilities for the benefit of First Nations people, in actuality, it specifically benefits from much of the ambiguous language within the policy: “special relationship”, “mechanisms”, “Indian communities”, “active role”, “framework”, and many other terms (Kelly, 2011). It is convenient for it to not specifically spell out the details of what it means or how any of these policy commitments translate into actions that impact its intended audience. The ambiguity of the term “special relationship”, for example, implies that the government’s commitment to preserving health services on reserve is largely a “matter of goodwill” rather than a legal obligation (Cook, 2003, p. 35, Kelly, 2011). This vagueness is likely to be motivated by “social-political and economic…[and] practical reasons, such as to prevent the spread of disease” by isolating First Nations onto remote communities, rather than an intent to seriously and effectively address the problem of First Nations healthcare (Kelly, 2011, p.

Get Access