Technological singularity Technological singularity is the hypothetical period when artificial intelligence has progressed to the point of surpassing human intelligence, resulting in radical changes of civilization and human nature [6]. The ongoing acceleration of technology is the implication and inevitable result of what futurist and scientist Ray Kurzweil calls the Law of Accelerating Return, which described acceleration and the exponential growth of the products of an evolutionary process. The singularity is the inexorable result of the law of accelerating returns [1]. History The first mention of the singularity concept was brought up by the famous mathematician John von Neumann in the 1950s, who was quoted as saying that the "ever …show more content…
With self-improving machine superintelligence acting on our behalf, our biological limits can be transcended [3]. But, with machine superintelligence on our side, we could be vastly more successful at realizing utopia than ever before, [potentially eradicating poverty, war and disease] and helping civilization in achieving a more efficient way of managing the Earth's resources [3]. Criticism Some critics assert that a dependence on machines would result in humans having no practical choice but to accept all of the artificial intelligences’ decision. With society facing ever-growing technical and complex problems, people will rely on machines to make decisions for them, simply because they bring better results than man-made ones. Reaching that point would mean that human civilization is under control of these machines. Another issue raised regarding singularity is about the control over large systems of machines, where a part of the elite would have an upper hand in the access and use of these technologies. Artificial intelligence could offer "incalculable benefits and risks" such as "technology outsmarting financial markets, out-inventing human researchers, out-manipulating human leaders, and developing weapons we cannot even understand [9]. These highly intelligent machines would likely be allowed to make their own decisions without human oversight, though it implies a risk
In a guest column, Computers vs. Brains on the Opinionator of The New York Times, Sandra Aamodt and Sam Wang analyzed some of the arguments by inventor Raymond Kurzweil, one of the leading inventors of our time, in his most recent futurist manifesto: “The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology” (2005). Kurzweil estimates that machines will inevitably be able to surpass our thinking capabilities within a few decades. Kurzweil's speculative reasoning has been heavily debated and challenged. In Aamodt and Wang's article they point out that there are fundamental differences between our brains and computers that makes Kurzweil's predictions improbable. The purpose of this essay is to evaluate the arguments of sides, Kurzweil's book
One example of this is when the stock market index had a quick, but massive crash, losing nearly one trillion dollars, which is “a prime example of the dangers of Artificial Intelligence manipulating stock” (Loubriel). Although human stockbrokers managed to shut down the system and prevent a complete economical crash, once superintelligence is achieved, there will be no way to terminate any AI processes. As soon as self-driving cars exceed the point of human intelligence, people will be completely under the control of their vehicle and will no longer be able to make decisions while driving. In addition, Nick Bostrom, a philosopher at the University of Oxford declared that “[humans] should not be confident in [their] ability to keep a superintelligent genie locked up in its bottle forever” (Bostrom). He emphasized the idea that once superintelligence takes over every piece of technology, it is competent enough to break out of the secure environment that has been created for it. Until self-driving cars are below the standards of being super intelligent, humans are still dominating every vehicle’s decisions. The consequences could be disastrous if they go out of control. Furthermore, physicist Louis Del Monte recently discovered that “[robots] are also learning
Nick Bostrom, a philosopher and the University of Oxford, states, “...superintelligence could emerge, and while it could be great [...] it could also decide it doesn’t need humans around,” (qtd. in Ford). This philosopher, like many other technology critics, can see the effects that artificial intelligence may have on our future, yet there is always the select group of people who cannot foresee the consequences of their actions. For example, Victor Frankenstein is introduced to science at a young age and when he went to college at Ingolstadt he met Professor Waldman, whom shared a similar scientific interest.
At the Polytechnic Institute of New York University, researches created a robotic fish, and left it to interact with regular fish. After a while, the robotic fish was accepted completely, and it eventually guided the regular fish as their leader. This is just one of many miniature examples foreboding the events that many people fear are coming. Events like complete automation, like a lackadaisical pattern in humanity as a whole. Nicholas Carr’s article, “All can be lost: The Risk of Putting Our Knowledge in the Hands of Machines”, tackles and discusses this idea head on. In this specific piece, Carr states that allowing the machines to do an exponentially growing amount of work for us will lead to people eventually being lazy, uneducated, unable
To conclude, AI technology has increased job loss, works to quickly, and puts the economy in a negative direction. AI will ruin the human race if we do not put boundaries around it at once. Next, the technology will ruin our future. Lastly, it will spread the human race apart. Finally, AI needs to be handled and taken care by slowing down the rate of its advancements. AI cannot get out of control or the world as we know it will drastically change.
However, some people oppose the Singularity, the counter-argument is that we are ending the human race as we know it. People like Stephen William Hawking renown English theoretical physicist, cosmologist, author and Director of Research at the Centre for Theoretical Cosmology within the University of Cambridge. In a New York Time article, warning that first of all artificial intelligence could copy itself and replace humans as Earth’s dominant life form. Second, he warns that artificial intelligence is the human mind without consciousness. It is possible that the AI will see humanity as so far beneath itself as to be irrelevant. We could be treated the way we treat bacteria. These machines could then keep on developing until they surpass human
Technology is advancing at a tremendous rate. However, the the future doesn’t look so promising. The infamous singularity will pose a threat to the human race. Artificial intelligence will eventually advance at a rate so fast, that each generation of intelligent systems will create more intuitive systems. Throughout history, computing power and programs have been changing rapidly. Flaws have always been an ineluctable fact when it comes to technological advancements. Humans are not perfects beings. If we created a superintelligent program with a flaw, this could quickly become a long-term threat to the human population. With future advancements in technology, the threat that superintelligent machines will pose is ineluctable.
Vernor Vinge states, “I have argued above that we cannot prevent the Singularity, that its coming is an inevitable consequence of the humans ' natural competitiveness and the possibilities inherent in technology.” Technological singularity is on the verge of having a massive breakthrough but are we ready for what it brings? Raymond Kurzweil, an American author, believes that singularity will emerge in 2045. Technological singularity is an event in which artificial intelligent machines go beyond human intelligence and have the possibility to redesign themselves. Scientific development and enhancement is in our daily lives. The concept of creating intelligent machines was almost deemed impossible but in the last decade, researchers and scientists have shown beyond doubt that creating intelligent machines is possible. These artificial intelligent machines produce potential benefits and problems in the biomedical engineering field, a field where scientists should not continue to work to on due to the dangers this field poses.
To progress as a society, we must first look back at all the hardships faced throughout the years. We must look at the world leaders who were able to convince entire countries to eliminate millions of people different than themselves. We must understand the groups of extremists spreading terror and fear across the globe, and we must control people in power abusing their positions to benefit themselves and their agendas. Instead of ignoring these human mistakes, we must break them down and figure out how they could happen. Artificial Intelligence relies on our abilities to learn from our mistakes and mold our future in a way that will be beneficial and equal to all people. This paper will present the many benefits that A.I. will give
The production of technology has come a long way over the past few decades and is changing everything society knows. New advances in technology and artificial intelligence have been implemented all over the world, and it is becoming more and more evident every day. The consequences are becoming apparent, and yet societies continue to focus their attention primarily on new inventions and improvements to various forms of technology. There are common misconceptions when it comes to developing advanced technology and artificial intelligence. The topic is highly controversial as society must decide whether the production of artificial intelligence be accelerated or delayed. Additionally, how much should the government be involved in regulating artificial intelligence production. Society is already beginning to experience detrimental consequences as production continues to advance beyond control. Technology changes us and causes us to act more selfishly and ignore the harms that come with these advances. This idea is relevant not only in society today, but additionally in the works of The Veldt by Ray Bradbury and The Gernsback Continuum by William Gibson. When it comes to the debate on whether to accelerate or delay the production of artificial intelligence, the potential harms considerably outweigh the benefits, making it advised to be precautious and delay to prevent society from becoming corrupted by new advances in technology.
Artificial Intelligence : Computers become exponentially better in understanding the world. This year, a computer beat the best Go player in the world, 10 years earlier than expected.
Artificial Intelligence is a topic within the public media that has existed for decades, but is now a concern due to the reality of human advancement and innovation in the field of science and technology. Many people believe that computers will become self-aware or sentient and view humanity as a disposable resource and gain supremacy. Reasoning that research on the technology should halt and not become more advance. Whereas others believe they will help catapult research and the economy forward, supporting the operations and innovations the technology offers. The complicated and divided solutions to the debate aren’t obvious, but there are more benefits to improving artificial intelligence than there is stopping it. Therefore, the negative effects people believe will occur can be resolved.
Most experts agree that Artificial Intelligence is on the increase in various fields. It has become one of the most controversial scientific issues of the twenty-first century. It raises the unemployment rate, workers will not find enough jobs for them and some of them may lose their work. As a result of technology, according to Wilson, Daugherty and Bianzino (2017), "The threat that automation will eliminate a broad swath of jobs across the world economy is now well established. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems become ever more
The supporters believe that the benefits and the positive impact of machines outweigh the negative impact on mankind. Machine supporters believe that if singularity, the "hypothetical moment in time when artificial intelligence will have progressed to the point of a greater-than-human intelligence" occurs, humans will not be obligated to comply with machines and accept to be overpowered. Instead, supporters believe that by that time, mankind would have evolved in ways to insure human's survival in a world with highly intelligent machines.
Since the advent of silicon chips and microprocessors the worldwide demand for computers has skyrocketed. Computer scientists around the world are pushing the boundaries of what is considered possible in their field by making their creations more sophisticated and capable year-by-year. Artificial Intelligence (A.I) is the idea of a computer system that can display acts of intelligence and independent thought similar to humans. Many people approach the prospect of artificial intelligence with fear and caution but for intrepid computer scientists true artificial intelligence is the ultimate goal. People are reaching an ever more symbiotic relationship with computers and as the world moves forward the question must be posed: Will computer intelligence ever eclipse our own?