The Absurdity of Scientific Creationism
We humans have always thought of ourselves as being unique, whether by divine sanction or by a self-established belief in superiority. For some, this understanding is intimately tied to the traditional tenets that have long been held as fact, having only recently been challenged. For modern Christians, the literal interpretation of the Bible=s account of creation has come under attack by the development and widespread acceptance of Darwinian evolution. To some, undermining the credibility of Biblical creation directly calls into question the Bible=s authority on its moral teachings. As Ken Ham, from the WGBH Boston Video Evolution Series: What About God? states, AYwhat it [the Bible] says
…show more content…
On the contrary, Henry Morris is shrewd with his presentation and explanations, and it is easy to see how a non-science versed individual could be persuaded into doubting the merits of evolution.
Case 1: AThe Wistful Search for Good Mutations@
In Morris= The Modern Creation Trilogy: Science & Creation[ii], he challenges the scientifically and commonly held notion of genetic mutations as the raw material of evolution (p. 176)[iii]. Although many scientists have acknowledged that the chance occurrence of a beneficial mutation is significantly low in comparison to any random mutation in general, Morris runs off with this idea and exploits it as another example where evolution has got it wrong. For Morris, it almost appears as if the evolutionary theory is part of the a greater Aconspiracy@ to deny the existence of God. AThe concept seems merely to be a commentary on the intense desire of evolutionists to avoid the Creator@ (p. 39)[iv].
Continuing on with Morris= logic on the unfeasibility of genetic mutations as a valid mechanism of evolution, he states that Aa >beneficial= mutation, even if natural selection is there waiting to conserve one if it comes along, is simply a figment of the evolutionary imagination. None has yet been documented in >real life= B that is, a mutation beneficial to the creature experiencing it@ (p. 39)[v]. To refute this claim, let us consider a well-known and characterized genetic disease,
Who made who? Did God create humans or did humans create god? At first thought one
Since the beginning of the human race there has been a lingering question as to the origins of man and how all living things acquired their characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this question. Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire universe, man and the numerous other organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and different. So in other words, one theory suggests that humans and all the organisms on Earth are the result of divine design, while the other indicates that they
Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.
The question as to whether or not creationism should be taught in public schools is a very emotional and complex question. It can be looked at from several different angles, its validity being one of them. Despite the lack of evidence to support the fundamentalist idea of creationism, that in itself is not enough to warrant its exclusion from the curriculum of public schools in the United States. The question is far more involved and complex.
When Charles Darwin first explained the theory of evolution 143 years ago, the scientists of the time wouldn’t accept it as the truth. The amount of evidence that has proven the theory outweighs any evidence of creationism, from palaeontology, genetics and zoology. But sadly in the 21st century, we are the most scientifically advanced race we know of but people still believe in creationism. If 200,000 people can say they are Jedi or followers of the flying spaghetti monster, which is actually a real religion. Any person in this room can create a religion if they want. We can barely call the theory of evolution a theory anymore, the evidence is too abundant because
Myth still remains one of the major links that merges the different cultures and religions from various ethnicities. “The Creation of the Titans and the Gods”, as well as “The Creation, Death, and Rebirth of the Universe”, are among the many creation myths that highlight these combinations. Throughout history, myths have created various similarities and differences between the cultures and religions of the world.
Over one hundred fifty years after Darwin’s theory has been published, the evolution theory is still highly controversial. The idea didn’t go well with the public, Darwin was so embarrassed by the ridicule he received that the swimming-bear passage was removed from later editions of the book (Than). Darwin’s views brought him into fierce conflicts with others who continue to maintain that the account of divine creation contacted within the Bible was correct. According to Than, Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection is one of
A Quick Overview of Seth Millstein’s “How to Argue for Evolution: Seven Common Creationist Arguments, Debunked,” Charles Darwin is known for writing about how different species evolved from common ancestors. Since then, there has been a debate as to whether evolution is a practical explanation for similarities between animals. Seth Millstein, a writer for the online magazine Bustle wrote an article on it in 2014. Millstein, rebuttals seven comments people that don’t believe in the theory of evolution use. It is entitled “How to Argue for Evolution: Seven Common Creationist Arguments, Debunked.”
Creationism is the acceptance that the universe and living organisms originate from definite acts of divine creation, as in the Biblical account, rather than by natural processes such as evolution. A creationist is someone who dismisses scientific explanations for the origin of life and the universe, preferring a hypothesis of supernatural creation by God. The considerable amount of creationists in the United States are fundamentalist Christian Protestants, but there are creationists of other denominations as well. Creationism was the default hypothesis before Charles Darwin’s, but when the theory of evolution was proposed, its superior support and explanation led it to quickly win scientists over. Contrary to creationist, today there is no deliberate scientific debate
This could make sense when viewed in the context of the fossil record. Saltationists would argue that there really are no gaps in the fossil record. The dramatic changes noted in the fossil record would be products of macromutations which are signs of natural selection. This cannot be the case for two distinct reasons. First, large macromutations are considerably maladaptive for an organism. In this sense, the size of a mutation will determine whether the organism will survive and pass on the mutated gene. Larger mutations will be less likely to be selected, because they will produce large behavioral abnormalities in the organism, which will significantly impair the organism in carrying out normal species-typical behaviors for survival. In turn, the organism will probably die before it is able to successfully reproduce. In addition, some mutations that are termed macromutations are not really macromutations at all, but instead small changes in the genetic instructions that produce large changes in the individual.
“The simple observation of the frequency of synonymous mutations in different species is the strongest argument for common descent that we can imagine. I can’t really think of any possible alternative explanation for that simple and universal fact.”
According to the Pew Research Center, about 62% of Americans believe that humans have evolved. Of that number, 33% believe that evolution was completely natural. Only 25% of Americans believe that evolution was guided with the help of God. 34% of Americans do not believe in evolution at all. Bill Nye once said, “Denial of evolution is unique only to the United States.” Many Christians believe that they are sinning if they believe that creatures have naturally evolved, what they do not realize is that it is perfectly fine to be a Christian who believes that something was put here and the somehow a human was placed on Earth. Also some Christians believe that everything but humans have evolved which is a little strange.
Interestingly, Alex Rainert, a man in favor of teaching both creationism and evolution, states that evolution is as much a theory as the theory of plate tectonics or Einstein’s theory of relativity. Yet, he explains, a campaign against those theories in courtrooms is, in essence, nonexistent (140).
Creationism being taught in public schools is not right because there are many beliefs about how the earth was created. Many science teachers have different beliefs on this particular subject. Some believe it should not be taught in public schools but on one’s own time at home, church, or another place. Other science teachers think students should be taught all the believable theories about evolution and creationism. Some science teachers have gotten in trouble with the law by not obeying other laws regarding evolution and creationism. This has lead to a lot of controversy in the science world. Even though many students have different views on creationism, not all of them are very accurate in the ways they portray the teachings of
In the history of science vs. religion there have been no issues more intensely debated than evolution vs. creationism. The issue is passionately debated since the majority of evidence is in favor of evolution, but the creation point of view can never be proved wrong because of religious belief. Human creation breaks down into three simple beliefs; creation theory, naturalistic evolution theory, and theistic evolution theory. The complexities of all three sides create a dilemma for what theory to support among all people, religious and non-religious.