preview

The Berlin Wall: The Fight For Political Freedom

Decent Essays

Seen repeatedly throughout history, it is evident that the fight for political freedom is often suppressed when individuals repress their thoughts and refuse to speak out against oppressors. A common occurrence throughout major events in history, it has become obvious that doing the right thing in society can only be done successfully when individuals act upon their moral impulses. However, the initiation of acting upon such inclinations is often overlooked and repressed due to the pasts of individuals. Psychologically affecting how individuals act and respond to societal issues, the repression of thoughts and ideas against acting out and taking a stand in society because of such pasts has become indisputably obvious over time. Unmistakably …show more content…

This is evident throughout history, as seen in the works of many global and influential leaders. Ronald Reagan exemplifies this idea in his speech at the Berlin Wall on June 12, 1987. “As long as the gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand,” Reagan explained, “it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom of all mankind” (Eidenmuller 2). His speech exemplified a point that all global leaders were trying to make at the time: the barricade nature of the Berlin Wall “[could not] withstand truth” (Eidenmuller 6), and “stood to restrain... freedom” (Jens 1). At this point in history, most of the world was too afraid to speak out against the Communist leaders stationed in West Berlin. By bypassing any unspoken rules present at the time, Reagan faced the most feared Communists of the world and spoke against their practices. Reagan explained,“in the Communist world, we see failure, technological backwardness, declining standards of health,” and continued to explain how “freedom leads to prosperity... freedom is the victor” (Eidenmuller 3). If he were to have not begged Mikhail Gorbachev to “tear down this wall” (Eidenmuller 3), it is no question that the freedom of those living under Communist rule would have been compromised. Henry Thoreau also presses this point in his works. He questioned if there could “be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience” (Saxby 2). Emphasizing how people need to decide for themselves what the difference between right and wrong truly is, Thoreau pressed the idea that one must not repress their thoughts in speaking out, as “a minority is powerless when it conforms to the majority... it is irresistible when it clogs by its whole weight” (Saxby 8). When one casts their vote, they should not be “willing to leave it to the majority” because

Get Access