Jesse Rania
Professor Forbes
English 101
7/21/2015
The Case for Gritty, Growing Students
The questions of learning and intelligence have long been debated since education has ever existed. That learning leads directly to intelligence is an assumption which has not been subject to adequate scrutiny. Typically, a fixed mindset believes that an "intelligent" student is one who invests less of almost about everything to not only succeed but also to achieve outstanding results. That is, by studying less an intelligent student is expected to know about study subjects enough, which requires the least effort possible of him or her. Talent, moreover, has long been praised as an exceptional gift which one is helpless to develop, let alone initiate. The ideas about learning, intelligence and talent are challenged by prominent psychologists and education scholars Angela Lee Duckworth, Assistant Professor of Psychology at University of Pennsylvania and Carol S. Dweck, Lewis and Virginia Eaton Professor of Psychology at Stanford University.
Both debunk popular myths about concepts of learning, intelligence and talent. Notably, both focus on effort and growth as critical components in learning and success not only at school but at life as well. More specifically, Duckworth emphasizes "grit" which according to her is, "Passion and perseverance for very long term goals." (and more, shortly) ("The key to success? Grit"). Meanwhile, Dweck compares growth and fixed mindsets by stating, "Those
In 2015, I wrote about my personal philosophy of the gifted learner. I stated in my paper that, “Giftedness is not a one, set definition. The definition of gifted must encompass intellect, ability, creative talent as well as emotional awareness. It cannot be micro-managed and be a “one size fits all” definition” (Dauber, 2015). People, who are gifted, need differentiation and opportunity to express, demonstrate and show their giftedness. Educators must be able to provide opportunities for the gifted learner to express his/her abilities and/or talents. Gifted students learn differently and require special educational experiences in order to grow academically and achieve their highest potential. Therefore, the education field must be able to understand not only the cognitive side of a gifted learner but the affective or social/emotional aspects too.
In his essay titled “Hidden Intellectualism”, Gerald Graff questions the traditional academic approach that correlates the school curriculum of colleges and high schools with intelligence. He believes that schools may not be promoting the full potential of students because they rely too much on the academic skills rather than the topics themselves. This means that schools often focus on the analysis and interpretation of academic papers rather than considering expanding the curriculum to have more topics that interest students. As a result, many students cannot express their true potential because they cannot get engaged in these school enforced topics. Schools underestimate their “hidden intelligence” because they do not try to promote their
The general argument made by Gerald Graff in his essay “Hidden Intellectualism” is that, All people are intellectual but that intellectual side is hidden, People’s intellectual side usually emerge when they focus on things they are inquisitive in, maybe in academics or in sports as long as the person doing it is really passionate about it. More specifically, Graff argues that students in school should choose the subject that they believe will assist them and applicable to their skills because once they are force to study subject that is not relevant to what they want or they are not really interested in, they will just attend their class for a whole year without learning anything about it. That is because they are not willing to do it, their intellectual capacity will remain hidden for a long period of time. In addition the author writes, that “It was in these discussion with friends about toughness and sports, I think, and in my reading of sports books and magazine that I began to learn the rudiments of intellectual life”. This passage means that intellectual potential is not only gain by academic people, anyone can aquire it as long
In the article, the author highlights differing views on the nature of intelligence. He states that in Asian cultures intelligence is something that they must acquire or work to achieve; whereas, western cultures view it as something one is born with. Neither of these views is necessarily incorrect however, I believe the best outlook lies somewhere in between. People are born with natural gifts and skills. Therefore, certain subjects come very easily to them. Nevertheless, it is possible for one to increase his skill by applying himself.
To enjoy academic success, you must consistently exhibit qualities such as perseverance, diligence, and tenacity; both in and outside of the classroom. When you are inside of a classroom, it is of utmost importance to grant your teacher your full attention. Even the most brilliant of minds find difficulty in achieving success if they do not adhere themselves to actively attempting to learn material that is covered in their classes. Contrary to popular belief, being a ‘genius’ is not required to have good grades. Anyone of average intelligence can achieve classroom success through perseverance and work ethic, although there is truth in the assumption that obtaining stellar grades may be more effortless for those with higher levels of intelligence.
With regard to the first assumption that Dweck disproves, she states that many teachers believe that praising children for their intelligence “builds their confidence and motivation to learn” (Dweck 34). However, from her point of view, this is a mistake as far as students tend to lose the wish to develop their intelligence and to advance. At the same time, this is connected with the view of many teachers that the intelligence is inherent feature and cannot be developed or improved. However, the author disproves these two ideas by referring to the idea of fixed and growth mindset.
Duckworth defines grit as “having resilience in the face of failure, but also having deep commitments that you remain loyal to over many years.” She went on to discuss how it is not just being smart that makes a person successful but having grit. After listening to the radio conversation, I realized that many people in my life have pushed me to have grit, we just did not know it was called “grit” at the time. For example, my mom always told me it does not matter how smart you are to get in to college and have good grades, what matters having determination and being motivated to do the work. Also, my elementary basketball coach always wanted her players to give 110% in a game. It did not matter whether we had natural talent or not, what mattered was
According to Duckworth came to feel it was not as relevant when it came to outstanding achievement people who accomplish great things. The growth mindset with effort certainly effort is key to achievements I think she really means that the more you show effort then you can get better grades.. She also said but most people do not know that when they practice and learn things because when they learn things and they might not practice for it but she wants them to show effort. Like Angela Duckworth said that the idea of grit and self control is that you get that through failure, Randolph explained “Students believe that effort will help you improve to your future.” He said that because I think this quote is really good quote because no one will
Albert Einstein once said "everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole existence thinking it is stupid". There are many students who relate to that fish believing they are unintelligent and useless. Believing that they cannot possibly succeed in the education system. The education system is failing to teach students and bring out their maximum potential. Everyday thousands of students drop out of school because they are failing to succeed. Gerald Graff argues in his article “Hidden Intellectualism” that the educational institution are failing to nurture students. Therefore, Graff believes that some students would be more willing to learn and have better success if they were taught things that interest them rather than subjects that interest the teachers. I agree with Graff because he writes about the misconception of intellectualism and how individuals think that solely the "geeks or the nerds" can have academic success. Individuals are completely forgetting that some students hidden intellectualism is found not in book smarts, but rather street smarts, suggesting that teachers should tap into students hidden intellectualism so that it can no longer be hidden.
Grit is apart of many people they are born with it and learned by your environment or parents. For example, one of duckworth's study involved cadets at west point and she stats "Cadets who scored a standard deviation higher than average on the Grit–Scale were 99% more likely to complete summer training,"As a result this shows how cadets need to be to complete the summer training. Showing that the cadets need to be higher than average on the grit scale to complete the training. Another example of the camp is when she states, “This is a technical point, but to simplify, it's the odds of making it through that improved by 99 percent. Most lay people, though, would interpret "99% more likely" as meaning that your chances of getting through bounced,
After reading Seal’s article which stated that Americans often thought kids are born smart while Asians more often believed that studying makes a person smarter, I was reminded my own personal beliefs on intelligence and I realized that I have thought people could get smart by exerting effort since I was in the last year of elementary school in Vietnam. Therefore, I empathized with Seal’s attitude that success and achievement are a result of working hard. I could remember that I got this attitude when I was in an important final exam which decided where my middle school was in the next year that depended on my score. In this exam, the math test was an extremely difficult test for every student because it had a strange math problem which my classmates and I had never studied before. At first, I had spent for 2 hour to solve this problem, but I didn’t succeed. So, I wanted to give up. However, I was worry about my score and thought about my mom, who hoped that I could get the high score enough to enter a famous middle school. Since I didn’t want to disappoint my mom’s wish, I tried to solve this math problem again and again and again. Eventually, I was successful to solve
However, Giel expresses later in the article that self-control is not the only factor of success and then introduces the two traits described by Duckworth as passion and perseverance, or grit. Duckworth arrived at this conclusion after carefully studying psychologist Catherine Morris Cox’s findings on world recognized geniuses such as Albert Einstein and Leonardo Da Vinci. If these people, who are prodigies in their respective fields, all possess these similar attributes, then logic may follow that these qualities may indeed be the key to
Have you ever studied for a test only to find out that the grade you got is not what you expected it to be and that your friend who had practice for a sport, an interview and who was working on a project days before the test got a high grade on the test? Well according to Douglas Barton individuals often fall into misconception, on the idea that performance on tests and natural intelligence are the same and that some of us are just more intellectually gifted. Barton in his “What do top students do differently?” a TEDx youth talk points out that success in individual performance comes from the dedication and initiative to go beyond what the average student does.
Graff says that putting students in classes in the contemporary system is wasting and limiting students’ potential and creativity (198). Complaining that intellects do not meet the success standard set by schools, Graff proves that schools limit the intellect students can achieve in their academic career (198-199).
“The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character - that is the goal of true education.”