The Change in Resistance of a Carbon Paper

On axis 5 I would give Charlie a GAF score of 22. His life is not functional. He cannot control his emotions when memories and thoughts of his family come up. He seems to be a very dirty individual who doesn’t care about what he looks like. He says that he often sees his family’s faces in other people on the street. His life is dangerous to him as well as those

Slide 15: Here’s the same curve demonstrating the z-score values for 2.5% at each tail.

1. Are any of the lab values in Table 1 out of normal range? Do you see some that are too high or too

received an accuracy level of 98%, which would indicate that John finds this level of reading

If your results were similar to the others’, this can be an indication that they were reasonably

When I first took the test to see what I scored, I was surprised with many of my results.

But why below 70? This score has been chosen as a result of normal distribution, meaning that it is directly linked and

Please enter the numbers here so that I know that you know how to read the SPSS output. Please paste your SPSS output right here where it belongs.

In Lab 8, the time constant of resistance-capacitance was measured in order to determine the charge of a capacitor. This experiment was conducted by setting building a circuit that connects the voltmeter across the resistor. The voltmeter was then connected across the capacitor. The above procedure was conducted several times using different voltages. Afterwards, the results were calculated and tabulated. The data obtained from the lab were the theoretical Tau for 5V, 4V and 3V. In this experiment, the calculated voltage was also determined. The theoretical and the calculated values were then compared and evaluated by determining their percentage errors. For example, in the 5V, the theoretical value was 1.23V; calculated value was 1.434 with a percentage error of 16.6 %( for voltmeter across capacitor).

The Kendall's coefficient of concordance is an index of interrater reliability of ordinal data, in this case indicating that the reliability is low (Kline, 2005).

As for the rest of my test results I think that they were pretty much accurate.

positive and negative. Data expected to display a negative overall health in life after 70. Data

It is a summated rating scale comprising of six subscales with scores ranging from 1-4. The lowest level of functioning is represented by 1, while the highest level of functioning is represented by 4. Total scores range from 6-23 each subscale is accorded values of 1-3. A lower Braden Scale Score indicates lower levels of functioning and, therefore, higher risk for pressure ulcer development (Health, 2013).

an 82). Both quizzes seem to be pretty accurate. I find being around a lot of people and being in

His response to “Indifferent” showed his Total Percentage was 20, in the normal percentage range.