Until 1990, Nepal was ruled by an authoritarian system. Democracy was declared in 1990 however it was constitutional monarchy system so people were not happy with this system. In 1996, Nepal Communist Party-Maoist started civil war and ended in 2006. A decade-long civil war had 42 demands but 2 demands were noteworthy that were constituent assembly election (CA) and federal system in Nepal. There was a peace process agreement between Maoist and government of Nepal in 2006. Constituent elections were held two times. After CA election, a new federal constitution has been made in 2015 but it will not be functioning until new federal election is done. People have taken it negatively and positively both side. It is said that ‘the constitution is being rightly said to be amongst the most progressive in Asia guaranteeing equal rights to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community and providing representation for the same in government mechanisms (P. Rohit, 2015).’
In the last sixty-five years, this is the first that has been widely adopted by an elected constituent assembly. This constitution has also made a progressive transition from being sixty years of being a Hindu-state to a secular nation (P. Rohit, 2015). It is also the ‘first constitution that moves away from the previously unitary system to a federal nature’ by setting up different provinces distributing ‘legislative and executive powers between the legislative and provincial governments’ (P. Rohit, 2015).
Problem Statement: After the earthquake in the early part of 2015 and the drafting of the new Nepali constitution and the later part of 2015 tensions are at an all time high in the nation of Nepal. Leading to protests, blockades and all around unrest in the populace.
In any given constitution a nation, the recording of bills of rights has been a gradual process. All the aspects of life in society were done with respect to the law. The society requires being guided by certain principles and guidelines that would define and evaluate each and every aspect of their lives. To ensure that the entire society remained focused and concentrated in the given policies and guidelines, they recorded in the constitution and made available to each and every member of the society for the purpose of doing reviews. The action of the people would be judged in accordance with the constitution. With society running several errands towards the realization of development, many fields had to be covered. Criteria for the operation of the people would require significant efforts to accomplish the set objectives. Violations in the society occur either due to misunderstanding or lack of awareness of the rights present in the constitution. Any form of violation is evaluated by the appropriate form of punishment offered. (Hand, 1965)
significance - It provides the formation of a government to legislate, it provides the funds needed for the government and it provides a forum for population representation.
singh 1 singh 4 Saurav Singh Sherry Sharifian GOVT 2305 11th November, 2017 Civil Rights and liberties "Civil rights" 1 and "civil liberties" are terms that are frequently used in the same way but the terms are actually very distinct. Rights are fundamental regulative rules that is primary things which should be provided to every citizen of the country. In 1776 Thomas Jefferson brought the Declaration of Independence which conveyed a message of all men are created equal and everybody should be treated equally. After the Declaration of Independence the black were still treated badly and made enslaved so, they started protesting and demanding for the equal right and protection under the law. So, finally in 1968 Civil Right Act was passed that restricted all types of banned which was prevailing due to color, sex, religion and national origin.
Although the contents of the Somewhereland constitution are generally well-structured, there are several clauses that will cause us some grief down the road, E.G. “everybody feels that they have somebody that represents them.” This clause is an obvious blunder, simply because it is impossible for every person to feel that somebody represents them adequately. The balance of democracy is essential to national longevity, and it would be easily achieved if the upper house elections clause was passed. The state, not the populace, should choose its upper members. The parliament should reflect the people, but an upper section of parliament should be chosen by those with understanding and specialized education. This system does not denigrate the intelligence of citizens, but acknowledges that not every citizen has spent his/her entire life studying government and law. That lack of balance within our parliament may lead to future corruption and political instability.
Heinbecker, Paul. “The monarchy hurts Canada's standing in the world. It’s time to let go.” The Globe and Mail, July 01, 2014, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-monarchy-hurts-canadas-standing-in-the-world-its-time-to-let-go/article19395567/. Accessed February 16, 2017.
The subject of how did the constitution create a strong government while limiting itspower and still protect the rights of the people has been covered intensively by the world pressover the past decade. In depth analysis of how did the constitution create a strong governmentwhile limiting its power and still protect the rights of the people can be an enriching experience. Until recently considered taboo amongst polite society, how did the constitution create astrong government while limiting its power and still protect the rights of the people is featuringmore and more in the ideals of the young and upwardly mobile. Inevitably feelings run deepamongst the upper echelons of progressive service sector organizations, whom I can say nomore about due to the legal restrictions. Complex though it is I shall now attempt to provide anexhaustive report on how did the constitution create a strong government while limiting itspower and still protect the rights of the people and its numerous industries.
If Canada were to end all ties with the British Monarchy we would be some kind of democracy, probably a Republican Democracy. A democracy allows all eligible citizens to be involved equally with the creation of laws (this could be direct or through someone who is elected.) Democracy values equality in religion, culture, social groups, justice, liberty and racial areas. Paul Heinbecker says in an article that has grown to be quite popular that, “It would acknowledge how far we have evolved as a society since the sun set on the British Empire and how far apart we and the monarchy have grown, a distance destined to increase when royal succession happens.” Some would argue that the royal family have a firm identity in who
The constitutional monarchy of Canada is divided into three territorial governments. The first being the Sovereign. The Sovereign is the supreme ruler of the monarch. They hold the most power but are limited powers by a constitution.
Gunay Alibeyli Written Assignment 1 Constitution is a superior law of any country and other laws are made on basis of it. That is why amending the constitution is a very crucial issue. The question can appear that “Why do we need amendment?”The word “amendment” itself means correction or improvement. Every constitution needs improvement in order to accommodate new political or social changes, in other word no modern country can live with an “old” constitution.
There is a dispute between people who are against the codified constitution and those who are arguing for it during the last two centuries. People who believe that a codified constitution is more suitable for democratic countries have strong points. For example, Heywood (2013) notifies that a codified constitution entrenches major constitutional principles and protects individual liberty. On the other hand, a codified constitution can be considered more rigid and can make it much difficult for the government and society to deem and balance new reality if the circumstances change. This essay is not going to discuss the strength and drawbacks of a codified constitution, but it is going to analyze how both codified and uncodified constitution deal with developed conflicts and unexpected circumstances. Moreover, this essay will examine examples from history and constitutions of such countries as China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Israel. My conclusion will be that it does not matter if the state has a codified or uncodified constitution, because the most important fact is that any constitution should be flexible enough to reflect political realities and respond on changed political circumstances.
In Article 44, the legislative authority of the Federation shall be vested in a Parliament, which shall consist of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and two Majlis (Houses of Parliament) to be known as the Dewan Negara (Senate) and the Dewan Rakyat (House of Representatives).
The Nepalese Gurkhas have been serving under the British since 1815. They have partaken in every war that Britain has been involved in from the Pindarr War to WWII. The Gurkhas are considered by many to be one of the Worlds finest armed units. The Gurkha corps are definitely the most elite fighting force in the British Army and they have consistently proved their worth in every battle they have fought, whether it was a victory or defeat. The common Gurkha has a diamond-hard will, and indomitable fighting spirit that clearly distinguishes him from his peers. For the Gurkha is no common soldier. He is a warrior to the core, and a not a man to be taken lightly.
Health in one of the important things of human life. Without good health people cannot able to perform daily activates. Health plays vital role to country’s economic development. If People health is good than nation health will be good. Economic will move fast if people are healthy because healthy people can perform task well. My research paper will research about Health care system in Nepal.
Good health is a form of wealth for a person, an important indicator of human well-being. The newly formed constitution of Nepal (2015) has stressed the right to healthcare as a fundamental right of the citizens. Thus, access to health care is now protected as a constitutional right for all.