The Corruption Of Public Scandals

Money laundering, amongst other white collar crimes, are serious issues in which fraud examiners and law enforcements agents deal with on a daily basis. The range of complexity vary; however, each case must imply specific procedures to obtain substantial evidence. The procedures vary from profession, which are used to collaborate to build evidence and abide legal aspects. Adherence to legal aspects are important in fraud investigations as such events can be used to dismiss a case. The procedures purpose are to reduce legal ramifications of a fraud investigation, obtain credible evidence and preserve the rights of the perpetrators.

In The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, the Salem court gradually transformed from its original judicial goals to corruption, which strengthened Miller’s argument of the susceptibility of legal systems to ungodliness. Since Miller was suddenly listed as a sinner due to an accusation, he wrote this play as a commentary to the Puritan society and the corruption of officials. Situational irony was heavily utilized to contrast the original goals of a just theocracy to the resulting court corruption. In the beginning, the court strived to achieve equity and fairly punish sinners. However, the court then used the concept of “devil” to manipulate anyone

Most of the news stories today report on several scandals involving high-profile government officials with corruption being the major criminal aspect. In a news story reported by Thomas, Ryan, Date, and Cook (2009), one brazen crime occurred in Tennessee whereby the then Hamilton County Sheriff William Horace was caught on tape taking bribes. Another case is reported by Wines (2014) whereby Virginia governor Bob McDonnell was indicted on fraud and conspiracy charges. These are the only few cases among several strings of scandals that have continued to affect the credibility of public service. According to Wines (2014), since 2000, there are eight governors and former governors who have been found guilty of crimes. Doss et al. (2013) point out that there are ethical dilemmas that exist in all these cases. In a way, one would be right to assert that it is odd to haul politicians and high-profile government officials before judges and prosecutors. Investigators also have a hard task dealing with such cases especially considering that the persons they are investigating are of high status in society. This has always created fear among investigators because they have to make hard choices. The same case applies to prosecutors who feel that ruling a case in favor of a politician would spark public outcry. However, they

I agree with you, in its simplest form the UET is a reasonable theory. In its dangerous form, the Bush administration used it as a means to justify rather unconstitutional actions. You mentioned that this theory is the path to government corruption. I believe executive acts like the Patriot Act and the Travel Ban have already led America down that slippery slope. These acts of overreaching power by the President cause Americans to lose trust in the government. Expanding Presidential power should not come at the cost of civil liberties and justice. At no time should the President be above the law. The Constitution should not be interpreted to fit the agenda of a power hungry position. In times of crisis, I can see how unilateral executive power

During the Fifth century, Germanic tribes from the north invaded the Western Roman Empire and sacked Rome (González pp. 260 & 270). This created political and social disorder. The Empire was then divided into separate independent kingdoms (González p. 269). As a result, the church tended to fill the void for order created by the political instability (González p. 260). However, as various kingdoms became established, local church leaders began to be appointed by kings rather than the churches (González p. 273). And, since the church had acquired much land, bishops became lords rather than pastors (González p. 273). The political instability cre-ated by a lack of a strong central government led to an increasingly feudal society (González p.318).

A federal grand jury hands down an indictment against Union County Judge Executive Jody Jenkins on charges of fraud and public corruption. The indictment claims in 2014 Jenkins took $20,000 in kickbacks in exchange for purchasing heavy equipment and other items from an unnamed person.

Political corruption faces a few ethical dilemmas. The prosecution faces so many issues when attempting to prosecute political figures for crimes of bribery or corruption. Conviction of political members requires a strong case against the accused and witnesses or whistleblower are usually essential in developing that case. The seniority of the political member doesn’t matter any acts of improprieties has to be held accountable. Speech or Debate Clause was developed to protect legislators from being persecuted by prosecution while conducting official legislative to further their constituent. These laws set in place makes prosecution of political figure for corrupting difficult and these ethical dilemmas the prosecutions encounter conflicts with

In other cases, some newspapers often have various “lines of defense” in which an article is review on multiple times before it is ever published. It is true that in the heat of competition to get the story first, a lot can result from it. One thing that the Times did well was their reaction towards the Blair scandal. As it states in the SPJ code of ethics, a journalist should “admit mistakes and correct them promptly.” The Times gathered a group of journalists that went over all of Blair’s past stories during his time at the newspaper. They found dozens of stories that were falsified and it became one of the biggest journalistic scandals. However, the important factor is that the Times rushed to correct their errors: turning into a story of

Those that would not be considered novices in the world of politics or government could argue that corruption is antidemocratic albeit corruption is not a political ideology per say it does share one or two fundamental characteristics with a ideology that is trans-disposed to democracy and that is the accumulation or adsorption of power and wealth by any means that does not incite arrest or incarceration from committing these acts, and secondly the acts committed for, or by means of corruption is in conflict with governing laws that all citizens must adhere by, this can also be in contrast to ethics and morality to most people.

In today’s society most social media has a political concept. In some media it is obvious while others the message is more subliminal. Scandal is a TV show centered around our American government and man political concept. The show is centered around a love triangle Between the president, the first lady, and his ex campaign manager, and the main character, Olivia pope “A former White House communications director opens a Washington, D.C. crisis-management firm (Web, TV guide).” There are twist turns and cliff hangers around every corner when watching scandal. Each new episode unravels a secret battle that the characters have within themselves and the government. Capitalism, Tyranny, Elitism, and Utilitarianism are

My heroes have always been those working to protecting the defenseless, becoming a voice for the marginalized and empowering those powerless. My dream is to make a positive impact through the legal system for both environmental issues and aboriginal issues to continue a legacy of social justice. Writers like George Orwell, Hannah Arendt and Samantha Nutt have expanded my critical lens and led me to insight. I believe the study of politics to be an invaluable discipline, as it can provide a framework for governments to protect citizens from the corruption of power. As a first-generation Indo-Canadian woman, born in British Columbia, I have the invaluable opportunity to be part of two worlds. This has enabled me to have a view point of an immigrant

If the accusations are false—or if it is true but cannot be proven—then calmly deny

The modern period of literature was a conglomerate of emotion and feeling from many different aspects of everyday life. The art, many of which came from the Harlem Renaissance, embodied the struggle to make ends meet in the newly industrialized cities. Literature broke the floodgates on exposing some of the greatest scandals and power struggles ever faced in this nation. Poetry was the unheard voice championing the early civil rights movement, long before Martin Luther King Jr. or Malcolm X were even in elementary school. With these great accomplishments came some of the longest lasting impressions on today’s literature and culture.

I feel that the checks and balances not sufficient enough to keep the power elites, of this great country under strict regulation. The elite of America have been here since the start. Since the establishment of the United States in 1776 those who have the money, have the power. George Washington was one of the largest landowners of his time. This theme stays true all the way to George Bush who had ties into the oil and natural resource business. I felt because of the lack of competing countries on the same continent, no controlling church and no big military to threaten the government which fostered a nation based on economic rule in America.

Psychologists have wondered how power can affect different people for a long time, they wanted to know why power brought out the best in some and the worst in others. Before there was any real evidence, the proof people would use would be something like how prison guards would abuse their wards. A person with power in your life is probably the one of the most important people in your life, and that can be a big deal, having power is not something to be taken lightly.