Reflection Summary
Limiting my sugar is a topic that I have been wanting to address for a few months now. I struggle with anxiety and my weight. I came across a website sharing how sugar enhances the symptoms of anxiety, so I have held onto the idea until HEA 110 encouraged me to put in on the table. I am not just addicted to sugar, but also the library, so the idea to obtain my needed sources for the paper was an obvious one. The library is the best source for information…and it’s free. I had to familiarize myself once again with CPCC’s credible database, but finally found the perfect thread within ProQuest: Public Health. Seeing my emphasis is based on health issues, I keyed in ‘health risk sugar’. I found the article, The Dangers of Sugar
…show more content…
It shares how the food industry has known for 40+ years the harms of sugar, and even taking the steps to not only cover it up, but to pay scientist to convey reduced result in their studies. An endocrinologist named Robert Lustig brought the story to the world stage at the World Health Organization; in which, he was shunned. Word got out anyway. I can see the direct control of the food empire’s greed as I was shopping at Walmart. I physically looked at the entire aisle of cereal products in pursuit of a healthier breakfast and not one item was free from sugar. Not one single package. I am excited about all the scientific collaborations that are revealing the harmful effects such as in this paper. The findings are showing direct links to inflammation, yeast, arthritis, diabetes, cancer, HBP, addition, and metabolic diseases. Sadly, the average intake in America is 50kg daily from added sugar in our packaged foods. I was one of these victims. Sweets are literally hijacking our brains. Let me explain. Sugar alters our brain pathways similar to the way cocaine does by interrupts the on-and-off mechanisms for dopamine. Leptin, a hormone that turns off the hunger signal and signals on
I grew up playing the game “Candyland”, and I dreamed of finding the golden ticket and living in Willie Wonka’s factory. I was also given a Gatorade after every sporting event I ever played in so what could be so bad about sugar? Sugar, real and artificial, can be found in almost every product we consume and although sugar is a simple carbohydrate that the body uses for energy, its impact on our body is far from simple. The consumption of sugar has been linked to a host of chronic health problems, including obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. The addictive nature of sugar is also a significant problem that leads to the other detrimental effects listed above. Sugar has also been useful to help preserve goods, fuel fermentation, balance acidity, and add flavor to other foods. Whether it’s cereal, spaghetti sauce, or yogurt, sugar is everywhere and has become unavoidable in our daily diets. As Americans, we have become accustomed to the sweet addictive taste of sugar, and our dependence on excessive amounts of sugar in its different forms has become alarming to many health experts. In analyzing preference and dependency with sugar, I will trace the addictive nature and major risks sugar has placed on society.
The past fifty years has seen a spike in the consumption of sugar, that number totaling a tripling increase. However, sugar is not the only risk factor here, alcohol and tobacco can also be attributed with the spike, albeit not as prevalent as sugar. The biggest question that Lustig et al. poses to its’ readers is this: “What aspects of the Western diet should be the focus of intervention”? (par. 3) The current USDA has been deemed “boogeymen” of diets, as well as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Lustig et al. all believe that our attention should be turned towards “added sugar”, which is a sweetener that has fructose in it. Perhaps the biggest controversy from the past fifty years has been none other than a severe culprit that experts know as high fructose corn syrup or HFCS.
Sugar can turn your liver into scar tissue if you have too much. Sugar can also lead to obesity. You can put yourself at risk of a heart disease, diabetes and mood swings and so much more. Dr. Robert Lusting (2014) claims sugar is ''poison'' for the human body. California students eat 160 fewer calories a day than other students in other states because we have labels on fast food menus (Brownnell, 2011). "The California Senate recently passed a bill designed to do just that, and it may soon become a law (Lloyd, 2014, p. 18). Americans deserve the right to know what can make them
When most people think about sugar, their first thoughts are not: heart disease, addiction, or slow and painful death; yet, unfortunately, these conditions are very real consequences of the unregulated and excessive consumption of sugar. In Nature’s article, “The Toxic Truth About Sugar” (2012), Robert Lustig, pediatric endocrinologist; Laura Schmidt, Professor of Health Policy at UCSF; and Claire Brindis, Professor of Pediatrics and Health Policy at UCSF, evaluate the world’s ever-increasing and toxic struggle with the substance sugar – also discussing counter measures to promote healthier diets amongst American’s and other societies. Lustig and his colleagues develop their argument using statistical evidence as they address the global impact of sugar, refuting minor oppositions, before dissecting each harmful aspect of the substance – even comparing it to substances more known for their toxicity. Eventually, presenting readers with possible routes of regulation, the authors firmly suggest government intervention in the production and sale of sugary foods. Although the argument is well executed, I remain unconvinced that government intervention is actually necessary.
After reading the article “The Toxic Truth about Sugar” my thinking and reactions are identical to the description of the results in the article. Keeping the overall view of sugar and its danger to human health and mankind, I consider the authors are completely realistic and fair about ways of controlling and limiting the amount of sugar which processed-food industry adds to its products.
In a recent article, Alice Park reported a research about replacing sugar in our diet. The research
Thirty-five years ago John Yudkin wrote a work “Pure, white and deadly” in which he explained the harm that the sugar does to the body. He claimed that saturated fats are essential for an organism since it tis the way for the body to store necessary energy, however too much glucose in the body leads to obesity. His idea
Richards has a powerful and effective argument as to why the audience should care about sugar and how it can potentially be fatal. For example, stating facts such as, “78% of Americans eat at least 22 tablespoons of added sugar a day according to the Harvard School of Public Health” makes the reader feel startled and disgusted by how much added sugar Americans eat each day. Sugar “[takes a] toll on mental health, including increased risk of depression and can cause a variety of other illnesses” (Richards). Mental health is crucial to your well-being. Family, friends, coworkers, children, and all of those around you are affected by your mood and behavior. If
The body requires sugar (Espat, 2015). However, there is recent speculation that sugar can cause cancer. “More than one million people in the United States (US) get cancer each year” (American Cancer Society, 2016). Most Americans eat more than double the recommended daily intake of sugar each day (Espat, 2015). According to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020, individuals should not consume more than 10% of their calories from sugar (US Department of Agriculture, 2016). While increased sugar intake can lead to other issues, such as obesity, which is associated with cancer, “diabetes and cancer occur together more often than would be expected by chance alone” (Oncology Nutrition, 2016).
Summary: This documentary showed how sugar is as addicting as cocaine. By 2050, one in three people will be diagnosed with type two diabetes, where in 1980, there was zero reported cases. Companies know this information and reduced the fat, but doubled the sugar in their product.
Sugar—it is that deliciously sweet white substance that we just can’t seem to resist. It is a guilty pleasure that is known by almost everyone to be unhealthy, but is sugar actually a chronic toxin? Is it slowly killing us from the inside out? In recent years, more and more research seems to suggest so. With the increasing epidemic of obesity and diabetes, scientists are looking for answers, and their findings are quite disturbing. If sugar is a toxin, then people need to know because health and lives are at stake and the sugar industry could fall apart. To answer the question about the toxicity of sugar, one must be clear about what type of sugar is being discussed because there are many different types. This essay will discuss high fructose
What number of you know what amount of sugar you are putting into your framework with as meager as one taste? Such a variety of people are taking a lot of sugar into their eating methodologies every day with practically no data about how hurtful it could be. Refreshments that we drink day by day, majorly affects our wellbeing. Numerous trust that if the drink contains natural product or vegetables it's viewed as solid. I'm here to let you know, that is false, any drink that contains sugar is not viewed as a brilliant refreshment. A case of a savvy drink is
I have always struggled with eating to much sugar and not engaging in enough physical activity. In the book, these two topics were very big. Removing this one substance from my diet and adding more of the other can be all that I need to completely revamp the condition of my body for the better. Sugar alone contributes to and is the cause of many diseases and ailments. Type 2 Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Obesity are all related to the metabolism of sugar (Ratey & Manning, 2014).
As we hear of more studies exclaiming alarming findings of negative health concerns related to obesity and our continuously growing percentage of obesity in our country, particularly childhood obesity, sugar is in the spotlight. We often hear of dieticians and weight loss experts warning us that we
This study answers the research question, “Is artificial sugar a good substitute for natural sugar?” The purpose of this study is to prove that natural sugar is needed in the human body in order to function, whereas artificial sweeteners only pose health risks. It focuses upon a topic where many believe that artificial sweeteners can prevent weight loss, while still being able to have the sweet taste that they crave. According to Scutti (2013) studies have concluded that people who consume these substitutes are only at risk for type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease.