preview

The Death Penalty Is Justified

Decent Essays

One hundred sixty-eight innocent people, including nineteen children were brutally killed. On April 9, 1995, Timothy McVeigh vengefully bombed the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City (Gorman). He never expressed any remorse for his actions. In an interview with The Guardian, McVeigh states, “If I’m wrong then I’ll adapt, improvise and overcome. But if there is a hell, then I’ll be in good company with a lot of fighter pilots who also had to bomb innocents to win the war,” (Gorman). More recently, a common trend has been the disapproval of the death penalty, exhibited by the thirteen percent drop in the number of people on death row since Spring of 2005 (Death Penalty Info. Center). Life without parole has become the preferred sentence of unavoidable capital punishment. The death penalty has frequently been viewed as inhumane. However, isn’t lack of remorse for such vile acts inhumane? In cases of intentional murder in which the perpetrator has no remorse, it is justifiable to further implement this type of punishment in order to achieve justice for the family of the victim, prevent any undeserved benefits of living in the prisons, and avoid giving prisoners false hope while putting them through a pointless, monotonous sentence.
The pain and misery suffered by the victims’ families of the Oklahoma bombing was unimaginable. No one deserved to lose their life so suddenly, and no family deserved to learn that their relatives and friends would be gone forever. The

Get Access