Introduction Today’s digital artists work in an environment where information and access to design inspiration are, literally, at their fingertips. Many in the industry use the artwork of others in order to inspire their on artwork and provide content for their projects. However, I have noticed that many fail to give the proper credit to the artists’ whose work(s). Digital media and internet has transformed the world of copyrights in many ways. The digital environment has made it very easy to distribute and re-distribute content (Kankanala,2012). It could also be very possible that many people have little to no familiarity to intellectual property or copyright laws. When dealing with sources found digitally the laws become even more blurred and confusing; Copyright laws, traditionally, were intended protect authors and artists and physical mediums. Lawmakers’ struggle with copyright law is how to apply laws intended for one purpose to today’s high tech environment fast-paced environment. Laws are continuously being proposed and paced to stop piracy and infringement of intellectual properties (Yearneau, 2010; Jamar, 2013; Grimellman, 2014). Although, it may be a murky and confusing subject it is best for those creating and using artistic works on line to know what is legally appropriate for them to do. It is important for a graphic artist/ graphic designer to have the ability to protect his/her own work(s) and reputation as a professional by working within the parameters of
Ideas are neither created nor destroyed, therefore the notion of originality is false. Originality cannot exist if every thought and idea are preexisting, because it is proven that as human beings we are naturally inclined to copy one another. In art specifically, it comes to no surprise that artists can become heavily influenced by another’s artwork and unconsciously copy them. In some instances, this would be considered plagiarism and copyright infringement, but to Jonathan Lethem, it is a gift. In his piece, “The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism” he discusses the obscenities of privatizing ideas and opinions, because it restricts creativity. By forming false entitlement on something that was never truly yours, other individuals suffer
Thesis: This paper will discuss the specifics of copyright through fair use and appropriation art, how the laws have changed over the past 50 years, and its impact on the field.
It does not deal with credit being given, and its main purpose is for the common good. However in some school projects, students are required to cite the locations of the images they use. Copyright grants an artist exclusive rights over their work, but it does not always work in the favor of the artist or owner of the work. It is inevitable that someone would either use, repurpose, or steal an artwork, and it is not something that can be prevented. However, there are methods for an artist to use for their
files by CofS in Boulder County, CO" (Fearer 350). The CofS requires that members pay
Multiple laws are set when people create or post videos. The most important law is copyright. Videos will get copyrighted if the user uses a piece of material that is not theirs. A copyright on a piece of an author’s work is a form of protection that gives the author the ownership to that work. For example, books, music, and arts have a copyright symbol so that no one else can get credit besides the author who created it. Another law that is the fair use law. Fair use gives copywriters the right to use apart or all of their work. Fair use allows people to use work for criticism,
The EFF is the leading non-profit organization defending civil liberties in the digital world. They are there to ensure that the rights and freedoms are enhanced as technology grows. They basically help to ensure that the rights of individuals are not violated with the use of technology. They use the unique expertise of leading technologist, activist and attorneys in their efforts to defend free speech online, fight illegal surveillance, advocate users and innovators and support freedom enhancing technologies. So they want to ensure that people are free to express themselves using technology, prevent people from being able to monitor you without authorization and helps the creators and users in the use and development
In fact, many individuals don’t realize that when they are breaking copyright by screenshoting and uploading their favorite images on sites such as Pinterest, Facebook, or even Tumbler. This means that every screenshot, upload, download, and print hurts the livelihood of the photographer and makes it difficult for them to make a living. If an individual would like to download/print, share, or build upon a photograph they should speak to the copyright holder/photographer directly. Organizations such as Creative Commons (CC) and Professional Photographers of America (PPA) work to uncomplicate, demystify, and simplify copyrighting/licensing. They also help to connect consumers with the photographer so that they can easily find out about what type of licensing is on a particular photograph, song, story,
Failure to Protect and Abuses of the Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Implicit simply implies the problem, letting one ponder and figure out the facts for themselves. Whereas, explicit straight out tells one the problem, giving all the facts, then telling one to decide.
On October 28, 1998, President Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) which was designed to address issues in copyright laws created by evolving technology -(“Piracy and File-Sharing”). The law was also aimed at international concerns involving copyright, and even ended up setting the rules for copyright infringement on the internet - (“Piracy and File-Sharing”). In 1997, President Clinton signed the No Electronic Theft Act (NET) which provides for enhanced criminal remedies for copyright infringement. The law was designed to stem the widespread theft of computer software -(“Piracy and
Have you ever bought a CD, listened to it, and then wondered, “Why did I spend fifteen dollars on that?” There are two ways in which to answer that question. Either you concur and know how irritating such a situation could be, or you could be one of the many people today who simply omit purchasing music and download it straight from the Internet. It is fascinating what the Internet can do today. Just about anything can be done with the use of a computer. So, why should hard working people who want to enjoy the harmonies of their favorite bands have to trek to a store like “Best Buy” and purchase the dingy compact discs when they could get the same content for free and from the comfort of their home? Beside it being illegal, there
At the beginning of 2012, a series of coordinated protests occurred online and offline against Stop Online Piracy Act Bill (SOPA) that expands U.S. law enforcement’s ability to combat online copyright infringement. As this protest involved many influential websites like Google and Wikipedia, it certainly draws national attention on SOPA. Whether censorship should be used online against online materials infringing property rights, as included in SOPA, is the controversial issue. Even though SOPA eventually was terminated by the Congress, things behind SOPA cause further debates. The relationship between censorship, free speech and copyrights in this bill is worth discussing. In SOPA,
The Trio’s creative output could potentially be copyrighted to protect their intellectual property. For starters, they and their product meet the four main conditions to satisfy for copyright protection; the item must be copyrightable, the item must be sufficiently copyrightable, the author must be a qualified person, and the item must exist to some extent of tangibility (Bainbridge, D. 2006). Because the animation itself is uploaded on the internet, it is considered tangible and therefore subject to be copyrighted. The three members of the Trio have graduated from a bachelor’s degree in communications, which covers a range of topics including visual material. This means that they are qualified to
In today’s society, technology and art go hand in hand. Art has been around for a long time but technology such as computers are still very new. These two mediums have comingled and now evolve and effect the other. Art has changed to reflect the vast improvements technology has contributed to communication and the ability to create using digital space. Technology has also changed with artist pushing the boundaries of what is technical possible in the digital realm. Much of today’s art is created and presented in digital formats. The question of whether digital art is truly art has risen among many critics in the art community.
In today’s technological age and consumer-driven economy, there is no doubt that media piracy and file sharing are in demand and makes a big business. Not only the so called “bootlegged” materials cost less, but most of it also managed to completely imitate the quality of the original materials. It is much easier to people to download movies or music online or buy bootlegged DVDs for 5 dollars than to watch the movie in theaters or pay for the whole CD when there is only one song that the person likes. People know about the possible consequences of these actions, but they do not have a choice especially in these times of economy recession, plus everyone nowadays is doing it, so it would not be considered such a big deal at