The Effects Of Fracking

Fracking is short for hydraulic fracturing, a type of drilling used by oil companies to tap the valuable oil veins located miles below the earth’s surface. Fracking has been the subject of discussion for some time now, not necessarily for its effectiveness, but for its effect on the environment. Fracking has been known to release methane gas into the atmosphere; methane gas is a greenhouse gas and along with gasses like CO2 is one of the gasses that contributes to the warming of the planet. In Louis W. Allstadt’s article “Fracking Contributes to Global Warming” he states that, “methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas in the short term-less

While fracking has provided a cleaner fuel, there are many negative effects to the environment, the beef industry, human health and little positive effects. Some of these effects include; ground water being polluted with harmful chemicals, this polluted water can cause extreme sickness in humans. Fracking disrupts the habitats of animals and they have to leave the area to find clean water and a better food supply. Also it has been taking an effect on the beef industry in how farmers raise and sell their cattle. Fracking can have negative long term effects on the people living in the local area and make that area inhabitable.

In 2026, life in Dimock, Pennsylvania was a lot different than how it was twenty years ago. This is evident by all the new advances in technology within the two decades. However, what changed the town the most was the hydraulic fracturing boom back in the mid-2000s. The town has experienced many ups and downs because of all the gas companies coming in to extract the natural gas from the Marcellus Shale, that lies underneath the land. Dimock had received a lot of attention from the media due to the side-effects of fracking, some families also engaged in long lawsuits against the companies because of these harmful side-effects of fracking. The government finally stepped in and demanded the gas companies to pay for

Taking care of our environment is the only step we can take to ensure that humanity has a long future ahead of us. To misuse the planet further than we already have with logging, damming, and pollution means a predetermined date where the earth will eventually be unable to support life any longer. “Compared to coal, the footprint of shale gas is at least 20% greater and perhaps more than twice as great on the 20-year horizon, and is comparable over 100 years”(Black). This exemplifies the fact that even though the profits may be great, the true cost put on the environment eclipses any benefit.

Fracking effects the environment and people the toxic substances in fracking fluid and waste water and as well as air pollution from trucks, the wells themselves have been connected to health problems. Fracking requires large amounts of water that may affect the availability of water for other uses, and it can affect animals that live under water. Fracking tacks natural areas, forest, and farmland and replace them with industrial zones, well pads, roads, pipelines and other infrastructure. That is why fracking is bad for the

Imagine an economy in the United States if we were an oil exporting country, like those in the Middle East. The States falls victim to those countries because we do not export quite as much as they do. This problem could potentially be solved by upping the amount of oil and gas fracking. Then, that now unused oil can be sent out to other countries, turning a profit here. Although many people believe that it is harmful to the environment, and bad for the public around it. The largest being that it will contaminate the underground water supply. Despite this, many people can agree that it is overall beneficial. Hydraulic fracturing is essential to the United States, because it creates jobs, it generates income, it could potentially turn the economy around, and it is crucial to our energy production as a whole.

Oil fracking may seem to be a harmless uprising invention to the standard peer. However, when looking into the concerns and damaging effects from oil fracking, this invention may be more of an issue rather than a solution to retrieving oil. Scientists and researchers began to discover that oil fracking could lead to the release of dangerous chemicals that can be threatening to human life and the environment. CEO’s are also not providing sufficient information and warnings surrounding the oil fracking industry. Articles by Thompson, Perez-Pena, Christopherson, and Gerken, all express the concerns and supporting evidence of the damaging effects caused by oil fracking. Ultimately, fracking is a dangerous method to getting oil because the chemicals

The exploitation of fossil fuels is already a concerning process as it pumps carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, this contributing to the big issue of global warming, or cooling, however you choose to look at it. Fracking therefore allows for a lot more carbon to be burned and once again, be pumped into the atmosphere for further environmental destruction. Furthermore, Ian Ratcliffe justifies that through the process of fracking, there are numerous profound impacts that it would have on the environment. Water contamination and air pollution are two of the most prominent but detrimental issues that would follow. These would affect the health of the population, and therefore, the sick will fall.

what this is talking about how fracking is good and bad.Toxic substances are in fracking fluid and waste-water as well as air pollution from trucks. equipment and the wells themselves along with an increasing number of CNG fueling stations opening throughout the country.Just as plants do today, those living millions of years ago converted the sun's light energy into food (chemical) energy through the process of photosynthesis. Natural gas is most widely used in the industrial and manufacturing sectors chemicals, metals, glass and food processing,among others with its use to heat and power our nation’s homes and businesses expanding rapidly. have been linked to a variety of negative health effects. although fracking creates jobs for people and

Fracking is new method being used to extract natural gases underneath bed rocks by pumping on average eight million liters of water, fracking water consists several thousand pounds of sand and about to two hundred thousand liters of chemicals according to source C. Since this is a new method of extracting natural gases, there's only been very little advance research that has been done among the dangers the environment, wildlife, and humans. This highly new expensive machinery produces greater amounts of fossil fuels that increases the percentages of global warming . Fracking gives a larger exposure to harmful chemicals in bed rocks that lead there way to our clean drinkable water. Though using this new method of extracting natural gases would

Fracking is the breaking of rocks in order to release oil gases stuck inside them. They do this by drilling down real deep and pump a mixture of water, sand and chemicals. The mixture causes rocks to crack and release oil gases and are pushed into a container. Of course there are benefits to fracking, but there are major negative effects of fracking. Mostly effects that affect our population.A primary example of negative effects is the contamination of drinking water for people (Source C). This is very bad because it affects a huge amount of the population the the United States if the water is contaminated. The contaminated water cannot be clean or purified through normal means making it nearly impossible to clean. “Water for fracking is typically

I currently live in Colorado Springs, CO. I have a son that is 16 and two daughters that are 18 and 21. I am married with a beauty and I am only 39 years young. I am also a grandfather of an awesome 3-year-old boy. That’s right! I am a Grandpa! I also play the guitar, but my best hobby is riding motorcycle.

For many years now, oil and gas have been harvested from deep beneath the Earth’s surface using thousands and millions of gallons of water, known as hydraulic fracking. Environmental critics have brought up issues with this type of fracking. The main being that while using these massive amounts of water every time a well is fracked, all the used water, when finished, is causing significant amounts of pollution. In response to the current criticism, engineers have developed waterless fracking operations, where propane gel, butane, and other liquid and gas alternatives are used to break the shale that is deep beneath the Earth’s surface. Even though this new water-free system does not use the massive amounts of water like its hydraulic counterpart, there are still critics saying that it has its own environmental impacts. Assessing these impacts and therefore the philosophical justifications for this sort of method provides support for its continued use.

Mitchell talks about the two methods of natural gas mining, slant and fracking. Fracking is the drilling then pressurizing of a cavity with hydraulic fluid mean to release natural gas. The fluid not only stays in the ground but some gases like methane aren’t taken up in the mining, and end up leaching into the groundwater people use for drinking, irrigation, rearing, etc. The eventual problems are and will not be as overt as war for oil in the MENA but the people will see firsthand the problems of greed and environmental problems. The harmful side effects of fracking in the US have been seen and are becoming more evident. I think in time there might come a problem where the people of the US won’t stand for the companies harmful effects for

One of the immense drawbacks of hydrofracturing is the amount of water used up in the process and the wastewater generated. Many states, such as California, are currently stuck in a serious drought and need all the water they can get. However, fracking takes up enormous amounts of water as "it can take up to 4 million gallons of water to fracture a horizontally drilled shale well" (Ohio Department of Natural Resources), water that could be purified and given to the people in need. After up to 4 million gallons of water are used up in a single fracking process, "California[‘s] oil wells return five gallons of "produced water," often laced with contaminants such as boron, ammonia, and organic compounds, for every barrel of oil" (Environment California).