Organizations face many pressures in their attempt to navigate daily operations, while conducting business in such a way that their stakeholders are satisfied. This organization must meet stakeholder satisfaction with regard to profit margins, stock prices, and personal and organizational beliefs. The belief structure of the organization, as a whole, as well as concerned individuals holds special emphasis, as it directs how operations influence the organization’s image. As the global conscience advances through the 21st century, the environmental effect of operational planning and execution take center stage in the efforts to curb and reduce the ecological footprint of a company. Southwest Airlines must remain cognizant of their …show more content…
Puempel and Williams (2016) project that failure to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement could lead to rising sea levels, warmer air temperatures, and more erratic weather and jet stream patterns, which will threaten coastal airports, increase the amount of fuel required for takeoff and landing, and shift flight patterns to less fuel efficient paths.
Hope comes in the form of a progressive vision, one which will set Southwest above its peers in the modernization of environmentally conscious advancement of aviation practices. Setting an example by making commercial aviation operations sustainable and environmentally sound through the implementation of innovative practices in air and ground operations for the betterment of the aviation industry and the human race. This vision will lead to an industry benchmark in the effective, efficient, and effusive operations that will become commonplace in the future of commercial aviation. Although this is a very ambitious vision, it is attainable through solid change strategy, focusing on existing technology, for operations in flight and on the ground.
The main contributor to carbon emissions, and the primary factor of the environmental impact of aviation, is jet engines. Two ways that an airline company can save on fuel expenses, and the subsequent impact to the environment, is through altering takeoff procedures and investing in more fuel-efficient engines. Fuel requirements for takeoff
This success is partially, influenced by the efforts that are undertaken by the firm in controlling and lowering its fuel consumption, mainly, but also by reducing waste and recycling (Delta Airlines, 2014). 3. Customers’
In 2012, transportation accounted for 19% of the total global energy consumption, 96% of which was produced by fossil fuels [1, p. 201]. Furthermore, air transport is the most carbon intensive mode of transportation, accounting for approximately 10 times more carbon emissions than road transport and 100 times more than shipping (per tonne km) [2, p. 4].
Planet: Operations managers are always looking for ways to reduce companies environmental impact on the earth, and they achieve this through careful selection of raw materials, process innovations, alternative product delivery methods or disposal of end of life
The objective of this research paper is to describe how the 21St Century utilized concepts , such as corporate social responsibility in relation with triple bottom line, to shift the airline industry into becoming a forward-thinking industry embedding sustainability into their core of business operations to create shared value for business and society. I will define corporate social responsibility and areas of social responsibility in the airline industry at the beginning of the paper and proceed with how it ties into the bottom line concept. Next, I will give brief examples of airlines such as JetBlue Airways, and British Airways how they apply these concepts into their mission. In conclusion, I will express my own thoughts about how different generations based their purchases and career decisions on these concepts.
The implementation of the carbon tax had a negative affect on the aviation industry, as the airlines could not absorb the higher cost of fuel. This meant to offset costs travelers would pay extra in ticket prices (Herald, 2011).
Lockheed Martin already has several sources of competitive advantage that it uses effectively to gain leverage in the market place. However, given that the budget of its main customer is highly volatile the corporation should look to other sources of competitive advantage. It would be advantageous of the corporation to use its innovate workforce and emerging technology to develop “green” aircraft that use less fuel and emit less harmful emission. This would be a win for the environment, the customer, and the corporation—and clearly position the corporation as an industry
In addition, American Airlines also prides itself on maintaining a happy healthy work environment so they can maintain a positive surrounding community. They do this through acting as responsible stewards as well as reducing their mark on the environment. They act as responsible stewards through continuously looking for new ideas and opportunities to further improve their environmental performance.(Corporate Responsibility) In 2009 they made impeccable improvement to the environment in several was such as the fact that their environmental initiatives resulted in the reduction of their greenhouse gas emissions related fuel from 2008. This is not the only way they have aided in the improvements of the environment they also saved at least $10 million through energy-saving initiatives, as well as increasing fuel-efficiency. Furthermore, they signed agreements in partnership with 15 other airlines to purchase future supplies of alternative fuels they also reduced ozone depleting substances through the replacement of certain industrial cleaning products. (Corporate Responsibility)
As one of the most publicised and well-known companies in the nation Qantas’ reputation can hinge on their sustainability practices. Any slip up for the company will attract media attention which is why it is pivotal that Qantas has adequate sustainability practices in effect. As an international airline, the amount of resources in which Qantas can lead to a significant impact on the environment. There are many areas within the daily routine in which Qantas need to be wary of how the company’s actions are affecting the environment. Some of the main sustainability issues in which Qantas need to focus upon is there carbon emission footprint, this includes practices such as fuel consumption and efficiency and releasing emissions. The safety of
Since the development of commercial of air travel, Airline operations have had negative effects on both people’s health and the health of the environment. Because of this many airports, like many other industries, are coming under great pressure to develop greener and more sustainable business models. In the United States, many companies have changed their practices in order to adhere to government regulations, but lately there are a growing number of companies that have been more proactive in their adoption of greener practices. The Chicago O’Hare airport operated by the Chicago Aviation Department, the CDA, is one such organization that has taken upon itself to try to become one of the industry’s leading sustainable companies. They have
“For over 75 years Alaska Airlines, and the people who make us who we are, have been guided by integrity, caring, ingenuity, professionalism, and a unique spirit. A spirit that was has grown out of our geographical roots” (Overview Alaska Airlines). Alaska Airlines have founded the corporation by its three guiding principles of: the people, the community, and the environment. The people comprise of those individuals who make up Alaska Airlines and work to unsure its success day in and day out. The community is those who are impacted by the services of Alaska Airlines, such community can be through the services they offer or the charitable contributions they make. Finally, the environment has to do with the sustainability of the environment in which they live and operate. Much of their success is based on their commitment to leading their industry and organization with superior values. Many of the values that leadership at Alaska Airlines hold are similar to the eleven leadership principles of the US Marine Corps. The principles that overlap both groups include: be technically and tactically proficient, set the example, train as a team, develop a sense of accountability, and seek responsibility and take responsibility for your actions (Hess &Cameron, 2006, p.222). Alaska Airlines undoubtedly sets a precedence for the last two principles as sustainability is one of their fundamental
Southwest Airlines practices environmental responsibility by reducing excess waste and invests in cost-saving, energy efficient equipment. By using cost-effective and environmentally beneficial operating procedures (including facilities and equipment), SWA reduces the amount of materials used, and when combined with their ability to reuse and recycle material, they help preserve the environment. (The Mission of
Delta is dedicated to minimize its impact on the environment and conduct its operations in an environmentally responsible manner. The company’s ongoing sustainability efforts include increasing transparency by tracking its greenhouse gas emissions and ensuring that the company’s emissions reduction target aligns with those set out by IATA (International Air Transport Association). In addition, the company is encouraging its employees and customers to reduce waste through initiatives such as in-flight recycling, employee recycling centers, employee alternative commute options, e-ticketing and aircraft carpet recycling.
Aviation contributes approximately 2 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions, a figure which is projected to grow through 2050. Although fuel efficiency has improved by nearly 16 percent since the 1990s, future technologies—including better flight patterns, more-efficient engines, and alternative fuels—have promise for further emissions reductions. The profitability challenges of the early twenty-first century, however, affect the industry's ability to invest in new technology. (Hill, 2010 17-22)
Many firms are learning that being environmentally friendly and sustainable has numerous benefits. (O.C Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2015). This could enable them to increase goodwill from various stakeholders and also save money in the long term. This will mean that they are being more efficient and less wasteful of resources, which will enable them to be more competitive by satisfying stakeholders. The CEO of
The realm of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is to increase business profitability and opportunities by making improvements in terms of operational effectiveness throughout the value chain (Rangan, Chase & Karim, 2012). This increasingly popular CSR among corporate and academic leaders is synonymous to the “shared value” framework, whereby organizations seek to co-create economic and social value. According to Ridurnolu, Prhalad and Rangaswami (2009), corporations from the United States recognize the business value of revolutionizing new manufacturing and technology that cut operating costs while minimizing impacts on the environment. This CSR domain focuses on operational efficiency and also building revenue, with the initiative to be determined by the ability to improve the corporate bottom line while at the same time returning social value. To achieve that, the strategy is to reengineer a corporation’s entire value chain, which stems from natural resource extraction and sourcing to manufacturing, shipping and product delivering.