The Era of Nasser
Gamal Abd al-Nasser was President of Egypt from 1956 until1970. During his Presidency he dealt with two major events, the Suez Crisis in 1956 and the 1967 War. Nasser’s triumph in the Suez Crisis in contrast to his severe loss in 1967 can be explained by evaluating Egypt’s stability before and after each event and the reaction of the public during the times of stability and instability. In order to understand the stability of Egypt during Nasser’s Presidency, it is important to take into account Nasser’s government policies and what the Egyptian people expected from him. Nasser would eventually become a leading figure and hold immense powers within the Arab World. To Nasser’s surprise, being a leader came with great
…show more content…
To the Egyptian people, King Farouk was a weak monarch who could not defeat Israel and who had struggled getting rid of imperial powers, leaving the Egyptian people angry and hopeless. Luckily, their hopes would again rise with coup to overthrow King Farouk by the Free Officers organization.
The Free Officers On July 23, 1952 the Free Officers group overthrew King Farouk and seized control of the government. The group was comprised of junior military leaders and headed by Gamal Abd al-Nasser. Nasser, along with many other members, had fought in the 1948 War against Israel and blamed the devastating loss on Farouk. Although they had no political organization and no ideological orientation, they all had the common goal to end British occupation and create reforms to provide social justice. They created a two-fold campaign focused on eliminating rivals for power and proclaiming reforms and introducing a new constitution. In 1953 the monarch was abolished and Egypt was declared a Republic. Through this process, Nasser was able to do away with centers of civilian power, eliminated potential rivals within the military, and placed himself as the aggressive political force within Egypt. Once Nasser was in power, he began building popular support by introducing reforms. One of the more successful reforms was the Agrarian Reform Law of September 1952. The reform limited the amount of land an individual could own and the excess land would be redistributed to the poor.
Furthermore, Egypt then gained its independence in 1922, it being granted by the British; but the much of the British remained in the northern region of Egypt and in the duration of World War II, Egypt and the Suez Canal were fundamental connections in the empire of Britain. A government was then under king Farouk in 1936 but the government was very inefficient and corrupt. Egypt was not very happy with Britain’s control of the Suez Canal. In the year of 1952, army officers commenced a revolution to overthrow King Farouk and in 1953 a republic was established in Egypt. The leader of this revolution was Colonel Gamal Abdel Nasser and became the
This led to scarce food supplies, forced labor, and mistreatment of the peasantry, so Egypt was ready for a revolt at the end of the war. The Egyptian nationalist elites decided to form a Wafd (meaning ‘delegation’ in Arabic) party under the leader Sa’d Zaghlul that rid the British in 1936 from the Suez Canal. However, they did very little to alleviate the misery of the majority. Rather, Egyptian politicians held office just to increase their own family fortune and had no time for land reforms and public works projects that the peasantry desperately needed. Thus, the Egytian revolution led to backwardness.
The Ancient Egyptians government would be compared to as a kind of monarchy. Their King was called the Pharaoh and everyone in the civilization listened to everything that he said. Every Law and Business transaction went through this man. In our day we have only one leader but thousands of others that decide the laws of our country. We also have a vice president in America, if I had to pick a person to be the vice president of a Pharaoh in Egypt it would be the man called the vizier's. He was also well respected in the community and mostly was involved in the business aspect of the Pharaoh's job. The people of the Egyptian community really had no influence in the pharaoh's decisions, unlike America where we vote on all of our government officials. We also have people that don't allow our president to gain too much power, Unlike the Egyptians, where the Pharaoh had all the power in the community.
The situation was already so poor that the citizens chose to bear with it instead of fixing it. For example, the country’s total imports was greater than the country’s total exports. This proved how weak and unstable the government system was. According to the Washington Post, “You had 10 percent unemployment and 25 percent youth unemployment. Already there was a sense of a lack of opportunity and declining social mobility. So Egypt went into its revolution when it was already in difficult economic
In the Planet Egypt: Birth of the Empire, it provides an overview of King Narmer’s legacy and his ambition to unite the lower and upper kingdoms of Egypt as one. The debate present in the video is whether or not Narmer did it by force, or the people of the lower and upper kingdoms assimilated peacefully over generations to create one unified group.
The Suez Crisis was an incident that first commenced on the 29th of October, 1956, in which Israeli military forces entered the Sinai Peninsular and attacked Egyptian positions, driving them back. By the next day, Israeli forces had reached the Suez Canal, after taking a majority of the Sinai Peninsular. (Best, Hanhimaki, Maiolo & Schulze, 2008, p.432). Britain and France then both issued an ultimatum, for both Israeli and Egyptian forces to withdraw from the Suez Canal, citing its safety from the violence of war as extremely important. After Gamal Abder Nasser, Egypt’s President at the time, rejected the ultimatum, on the 30th
Upper and Lower Egypt were united for the first time under one ruler, however, this would come to an end around 2200 B.C.. In much of the Egyptian hieroglyphs, the Pharaoh was often depicted as almost larger than life, with great power and much of Egyptian art is a celebration of his accomplishments. The formation of a royal absolutism occurred during this period, with the Pharaoh and a small-centralized administration, composed mainly of royal kin and relatives, overseeing all aspects of Egyptian life. The Pharaoh was looked at as a living god among the Egyptian people, who assured the success of Egypt as well as its peace. "The Pharaoh belonged both to the world of the gods and the world of men, and he was seen as a bridge between them. Some of the local deities represented various aspects of nature, such as the earth and the sky, or the Nile and it's gifts of fertility. So the king, living in their midst, could bring the Egyptians into a harmonious relationship with their divinities and with the forces of nature upon which their whole existence depended" (Hawkes 43).
entered a stage of stability and growth, with the government caring more for the people. Egypt
The Egyptian Empire believed that the Pharaohs were the “messengers of the divine world with authority that is derived from a changeless order established at creation”, meaning that everything they say is directly from the gods who have had that relationship with the Pharaohs since day one (assigned reading 9/15 paragraph 2). The Pharaoh is the Egyptian’s image of the gods and “lord of the entire Egyptian domain” (assigned reading 9/15 paragraph 2). If the Egyptian’s are in need of guidance or wisdom, they look to the Pharaohs to give them to word of the gods. If a Pharaoh were to die, it is said that the rest of the empire would barely notice due to the “firmly established static history” (assigned reading 9/15 paragraph 2). The Egyptian Empire had political stability for quite a long time and they were often “depicted as a stable domain” while foreigners and Egyptian enemies were seen as chaotic. Due to being chaotic, “these groups belonged to the world of chaos and evil had to be annihilated or subdued” (assigned reading 9/15 paragraph 2).
Location of Egypt was west of the nile and was hot and didn’t have a lot of water. Lived in a desert climate closest to the sahara desert. Egypts government is a beaucracy a system of government that includes departments and levels of authority. A pharaoh was a king and was thought to be one of the gods but also human. Power passes from father to son, remains in the family. Farming and trading were the most important parts of there economy but they also conquered other peoples.
Background: In the midst of the Cold War and the Arab-Israeli conflict, conflict arose over Gamal Abdel Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal. This was of particular concern due to Nasser’s increased connection with the Soviet Union, through the Czech Arms agreement and the Aswan Dam. Following Nasser’s nationalization of the Suez Canal, Great Britain, France, and Israel invaded Egypt. In facing this crisis, the U.S. had to consider Cold War politics with the Soviet Union, relations with Arab and Israeli nations, and relations with the invading powers
Egypt today can be a viable market for the foreign investor, especially the investor who has the ability to see the rewards of in investing in the region for the long haul. The world and Egypt both realize that the region is the gateway to the Middle East. Egypt is leading the way for Arabic countries to embrace a new way of doing business and opening their borders to the ‘global village’ concept.
Egypt in the 1950s and 1960s was the leader of the Arab world and under the control of Nasser they set out to solve many of the issues of colonialism. Another prominent issue at the time was there was very little infrastructure in Egypt and the infrastructure they had exists mostly to push agricultural commodities to market. Other forms of infrastructure were also lacking. For example, Egypt didn’t have a large school system until the 1950s. There was also economic imbalances, one of which has to do with a small upper-class of ruling elite, the other having to do with how foreign interests capture large sectors of the economy; not a lot of industrial development, and then state-led industrial development. Land is not equitably distributed; there was a lack of an independent army outside of British control; and the country was misrepresented within politics because of the British involvement. Among the newly forming nation states we see Arab countries like Egypt starting to confront these issues and impart emerge as an independent nation state. That is absolute autonomy and sovereignty over their territory. During this time there were two main
The Suez war began in 1956 when the President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. Due to the canal’s great importance to the British and they colluded with Israel and France to regain control of the canal. The Suez Canal was especially important to the British because it connected the Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean through the Red Sea. (Milner) This strategic location allowed them to trade and move across the world giving them control of their colonies. However, on July 26, 1956 President Nasser decided to nationalize the Suez Canal due to his anger at the British for withdrawing their loan offer to Egypt. (Milner) Consequently, the nationalization of the canal was a strategic move to lessen the British’s economic and political control of Egypt, which had lasted since 1882. Many Egyptians were unhappy with British’s occupation of their country so Nasser’s policies were popular in the Middle East. This was because the “expression of national
Also, with regards to foreign policy, Egypt continues to emphasize the need for an effective and influential role for itself at both the regional and international levels. The authorities believe in having important synergies in the economic and political realms with the different countries of the Arab World. Relations have been strong with the EU owing