The General Strike was An Attempted Revolution
During the General strike there was true governmental concern about what seemed to be a revolutionary threat in the form of workers and TUC members who went on strike as part of their efforts to improve working conditions, reduce working hours and increase wages. Much evidence is available from around this time giving us a clear insight into the reasons for this concern and how it came about.
Source 1, an article from the British Gazette (controlled by the Government) produced very early on in the strike highlights the key concern felt by the Government at the time supporting both the statement and introduction:
'The General strike is a
…show more content…
So once again this supports the statement, yet not intentionally, for if we were to look at the intention we would see that it disagrees for it tries to highlight that it is not, for example they highlight behaviour not associated with a revolution such as, 'Anxious that an honourable peace is secured' and 'They are not attacking the constitution' evidence against the statement. Source 4 too, emphasises the fact that they are not attacking the constitution, highlighting once again that it is an industrial dispute and the behaviour they are undertaking to secure the peace. However, like before inexperience of the media has resulted in another possible undertone of revolution by hinting at an attempt to 'pull a wool' over the Governments eyes by expecting
Strikes are on the rise as protests for better working conditions continue. One of the many goals of the protesters
Imagine, you 're running for your life from tyrants, and you’re only fifteen. Not only would they kill you, but they would make you dig your own grave, terrified and freezing and the price for your capture is $247.78. Then a man comes to you with open arms and offers you shelter. One man who displayed this affection to jews like this in the holocaust. His name, Anton Sukhinski.
During the election of 1800, Thomas Jefferson succeeded in defeating the incumbent, John Adams, and assumed the presidency. In terms of elections though, the election of 1800 itself was a fascinating election in that it a heavily-contested election and was effectively the first time political parties ran smear campaigns against each other during an election. The Republican Party attacked the Federalists for being anti-liberty and monarchist and tried to persuade the public that the Federalists were abusing their power through acts such as the Alien & Sedition Acts and the suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion (Tindall and Shi 315). The Federalists, on the other hand, attacked Jefferson for his atheism and support of the French Revolution
The Winnipeg General Strike The year of 1919 has been one of the most influential years of strikes
Prior to the American Revolution, each of the colonies had its own form of currency that was used to settle financial transactions. During the Revolutionary War, the Congress began issuing large amounts of paper money, known as Continentals, which would be redeemed for gold and silver after the war ended. The states also began to issue their own paper currencies, and since these issuances were not regulated, paper money soon became nearly worthless. When the war ended, the individual states continued to control and regulate their own currencies, using mostly coins from Portugal, Spain, France and England. However, there was no consistency among the states in exchange rates for these foreign coins, which made it difficult to carry out transactions. The creation of the dollar as the monetary unit and coinage for the new nation was logical and necessary because it helped to unify the colonies and to establish an identity for the new nation that was separate from its European origin.
The use of 'scab' labour has caused violence in strikes and the conflict has disrupted companies and industries.State and Federal governments have been
I suppose I tended to be more on the side of “lets all hold hands and sing”, but it’s an attempt I was interested in seeing how the results would compare against history.
Once again, this poster occurs against a particular economic and political context. The 1960s were a time of high employment when workers felt confident to take strike action. “The late 1960s was a time of growing industrial unrest. Union membership had reached a high point of around 60 per cent of all wage earners. Between 1966 and 1968 the number of workers involved in industrial disputes had nearly doubled.” (Archives, Archives, Stories & dispute, 2017) For most the decade these strikes were scattered and not seen by workers as in any way political. By the late 1960s, however, Australian governments, concerned about high strike levels, began to confront unions through political measures, culminating in the Penal Powers dispute of 1969. (Archives, Archives, Stories & dispute, 2017) The effect was not to cow workers, but in many cases to politicise them. The impact of this trend was deepened by two other factors. One was the campaign against the Vietnam War which reached deeply into the lives of countless working families due to conscription and the threat that young men would lose their lives. The other factor was the wave of cultural change and the challenging of old social values.This heady combination of factors touched the lives of millions of working people.(Saunders, 1982) It also generated a powerful left wing in the ALP, which in Victoria was formalized into the Socialist Left faction, and swelled the membership of the Communist Party and new small grouplets further to the left. These radicals remained a minority in the union movement, but they had the confidence to appeal to much wider layers of working people. The newsletter pitches itself to its audience on two levels, moral and economic; it expressly states that the war is hitting them - the workers - in the pocket through increased taxes, aiming to draw them to the demonstrations and thus perhaps radicalise them, as well as connecting their immediate personal issues around their finances to wider political issues and engendering in them a sense that the war is morally wrong.
When should civil disobedience be condoned? Should it be condoned? Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to obey government laws, in an effort to bring upon a change in governmental policy or legislation. Civil disobedience is not an effort to dissolve the American government, because without government our society would result in chaos. Sometimes, when there is an unjust law and the government won't take the initiative to fix it, the public must act as civil disobedients to bring awareness and fix the unjust law. An unjust law is that which is not moral and does not respect the "god-given" rights which are entitled to every person. A law which allows freedom for some but not for others, on the basis of sex, sexual
“The concept of righteous civil disobedience is incompatible with the concept of the American legal system.”
In the midst of revolution, influential authors Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson each speak volumes about the clear vision that is to become independent America. It is the work of these individuals that one may accredit the characterization of America as it stands in the present day. In a country built on “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness,” certain values have been deemed favorable by the founding fathers. American political culture has thus been molded into one representative of liberty, equality, democracy, individualism, and nationalism; each of which Paine, Franklin, and Jefferson advocate for in some capacity through their writings.
The Convention then proclaimed a general strike, but many had no employer to strike against, and the Convention broke up after riots in various parts of England and Wales, with many leaders arrested and troops sent in by the government. A similar petition was presented in 1842, another bad time, with even more signatures, and was again firmly rejected. Again there were strikes; again leaders were jailed.
In life there are many situations where rebellion is required for change and improvement. Some are simple, like growing up and learning not to do certain things and others are more complex like when a group of people stand up for what they believe, for example, women’s rights and black’s rights. I believe that rebellion is healthy for any growing society. There are many things that we do not agree with, whether it is the law or our parent’s instructions. By rebelling we can change our society and/or ourselves for better.
The Revolutions of 1848 During the year of 1848, a revolutionary tide broke out in Europe.
Political power is held by those that who control the factories and are in charge of production as a whole and the working class are striving to reach a goal that seems unattainable, and rightfully so, because the people in power have made it this way. So anyone can see that social uprising or revolution would be the only logical explanation and course of action to overcome the people