preview

The Global Tradition Of Strict Prohibition Against Cannabis

Decent Essays

The global tradition of strict prohibition against cannabis is weakening. In the last twenty years, global attitudes towards cannabis usage has become increasingly tolerant. For example, this year Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has called to legalize cannabis in his nation. Similarly, in the US twenty states and the District of Columbia allow varying categories of cannabis usage.
This trend has been met with resistance globally. Representatives from the UN in recent years have expressed doubts that these actions of legalization are compatible with existing international law. This is highlighted by Uruguay’s 2013 national legalization for recreational cannabis cultivation and usage. Yet Uruguay - like many other nations - is a ratified signatory to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol (“Treaty”). Subsequently, Uruguay’s legalization is directly contrary to the Treaty. This has caused the international community to ponder the enforceability of the Treaty in light of current global trends. In light of this current global trend and the aforementioned Treaty, I would like to explore how Bond v. United States could affect a hypothetical case concerning a small business owner charged with being in violation of federal law executing the Treaty.
Before I begin, I must explain the framework I am working in. The Treaty is a non-self-executing treaty. As noted in Medellin v. Texas, a non-self-executing treaty is a treaty

Get Access