preview

The Golden Age Of European Growth

Decent Essays

There is no doubt that Britain was well ahead and much richer than the rest of Europe at the end of World War II. Post-war, Europe experienced an economic miracle widely known as the ‘Golden Age of European Growth’. There were low inflation rates, low unemployment rates, high GDP growth and a huge leap in the technology sector. France and Germany were the biggest success stories of the Golden Age. However, it was clear that Britain fell behind significantly relative to its European counterparts during this period due to external and internal problems. This essay will begin by explaining why Britain could not have grown as fast as Germany or France after World War II in terms of growth rates. I disagree that economic theory exonerates …show more content…

Catch-up effect, otherwise known as the theory of convergence, defines that poor or developing economies grow faster compared to economies with a higher per capita income and gradually reach similar high levels of per capita income (Economic Times). Britain definitely had less initial scope for catch-up and reconstruction because of its early start (Beans and Crafts, 1996). France and Germany, on the other hand, were low income countries with massive damage to their infrastructure and capital, and this gave them much larger opportunities for catch-up growth compared to Britain. During the Golden Age, Britain still had limited innovations and it began to fall behind the technological frontier. The serious lack of competition in British markets led to complacency in innovation once again. There was no need for firms to innovate quickly and relentlessly. This weakness in competition and low productivity performance of Britain granted substantial scope for industrial relations and managerial underperformance. There was just too much focus on old industries and full employment rather than productivity (Crafts, 2014). The State was unwilling to get rid of old firms that were costly, but had low productivity because this would cause a disruption by increasing the unemployment rate. This caused workers to be locked into low productivity jobs. The lack of risk taking also caused the British …show more content…

The historical events of each country create their institutions in a significant way. Institutions and policy in Britain that were laid during the Victorian era were not disrupted badly unlike Western Europe. Hence, it was much more difficult and expensive to amend outdated institutions in Britain even though they were not designed for current conditions. These inefficient and old-fashioned structures, especially in labour markets led to institutional failures which slowed down structural change (Kennedy 1987). Corporatist agreements were not legally enforceable because there were numerous unionism, unsuccessful agreements and wage bargaining that created an unstable environment which discouraged investment and innovation (Crafts, 2014; Beans and Craft 1996; Denny and Nickell

Get Access